ranch hand
Well-known member
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1732.htm
ranch hand said:http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1732.htm
Last weekend, we featured the “investigative journalism” of Fars News, the outlet of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, after its headline claim, “US-Alien-Hitler Link Stuns Russia”.
See Tehran’s “Nazis-Aliens-Jews-US” Propaganda — Meet Its Mastermind, “Sorcha Faal”
Can New US-Zionist-Western Conspiracy Help ISIS & Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Find Common Ground?
We explained that Fars’ source was the conspiracy-theory website “Whatdoesitmean.com” — purportedly run by a Russian academic “Sorcha Faal”, said to be the creation of a computer programmer named David Booth.
We noted other “exclusives” on Whatdoesitmean: “President Eisenhower Had Three Secret Meetings with Aliens”, “War Fears Rise After China Missile Tests Over Oregon“, and “Obama Plan To Depopulate Montana Raises Crisis Fears In Moscow“.
http://eaworldview.com/2014/01/iran-tehrans-latest-scoop-obama-plans-depopulate-montana-civil-war-certainty/
“mass internal displacement” of the citizens of Montana
Fearmongering and Hatemongering (with info put out by the Iranians Say what? ) to further divide this country.. Rolling Eyes Crying or Very sad That's what makes me laugh/cry/vomit when some of these folks like the ranchhand's of the country call themselves "patriots"..... Mad
ranch hand said:Ot I think with the people wanting the Buffalo Commons, the Yellowstone to the Yukon are going to have to start removing people from their land. I don't think it will get done in this generation, but look at your area and what they are doing. Free roaming buffalo and the buying up of land for the Buffalo commons is doing it one place at a time.
Does this not bother you or do you feel some other generation can worry about it?
Oldtimer said:ranch hand said:Ot I think with the people wanting the Buffalo Commons, the Yellowstone to the Yukon are going to have to start removing people from their land. I don't think it will get done in this generation, but look at your area and what they are doing. Free roaming buffalo and the buying up of land for the Buffalo commons is doing it one place at a time.
Does this not bother you or do you feel some other generation can worry about it?
Yep- but its happening all over the state and has been for years... How do you keep people with lots of money from buying something from someone else who would like to have some of that money ? Isn't that what true conservatives support- capitalism at its best...
Comically on this Iranian post about Obama giving away that section of Montana- some long time Montanans on FB said it really wouldn't matter that much -- as most of its been taken over by Californicators, treehuggers, and little gonaded out of staters that moved here because they want to feel big by being able to own/pack a gun....
ranch hand said:OT we could start by voting for people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
Oldtimer said:ranch hand said:OT we could start by voting for people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
You and the Tams of the world doing enough beeching, whining, and crying about the Dems- I don't need to...
I enjoy showing that the radical right is often as bad or worse then the looney left....
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
ranch hand said:OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
littlejoe said:ranch hand said:OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
Excellent points! Both party's have betrayed the constitution and most legislators are guilty of treason.
Sadly it'll probably take armed patriots---just like in the beginning---to get u.s. back on track.
littlejoe said:ranch hand said:OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
Excellent points! Both party's have betrayed the constitution and most legislators are guilty of treason.
Sadly it'll probably take armed patriots---just like in the beginning---to get u.s. back on track.