• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Ot better hope this isn't true

A

Anonymous

Guest
ranch hand said:
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1732.htm


I guess I better increase my investments in tin foil stock ! :roll: :p :lol:


Last weekend, we featured the “investigative journalism” of Fars News, the outlet of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, after its headline claim, “US-Alien-Hitler Link Stuns Russia”.

See Tehran’s “Nazis-Aliens-Jews-US” Propaganda — Meet Its Mastermind, “Sorcha Faal”
Can New US-Zionist-Western Conspiracy Help ISIS & Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Find Common Ground?

We explained that Fars’ source was the conspiracy-theory website “Whatdoesitmean.com” — purportedly run by a Russian academic “Sorcha Faal”, said to be the creation of a computer programmer named David Booth.

We noted other “exclusives” on Whatdoesitmean: “President Eisenhower Had Three Secret Meetings with Aliens”, “War Fears Rise After China Missile Tests Over Oregon“, and “Obama Plan To Depopulate Montana Raises Crisis Fears In Moscow“.


http://eaworldview.com/2014/01/iran-tehrans-latest-scoop-obama-plans-depopulate-montana-civil-war-certainty/

If you buy into this Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps "investigative journalism" then Ike should have been impeached for never releasing the info on his meetings with the Moonmen... :lol: :lol:
 

Steve

Well-known member
MINPRIRODY mini parody

Sorcha Faal ,.... such a fail

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index12514.htm

they guy is either making fun of the conspiracy theorists..,.. plain crazy,.. , related to Flounder.. (or that other dead fish guy) ... or a CIA operative..

or the guy who broke the Edwards' affair and was fired from the national enquirer after losing the photo of the three head cow that always had triplets.

either way it was a nice way to mock the EPA/Obama land grab..
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
This was going viral on local FB a few days ago- being sucked up by all the right wing extremist conspiracy believers--UNTIL a well respected locally raised Army Officer who is a West Point Graduate, Apache Helicopter pilot, Iraq war veteran posted the link to the site I did- and told folks to start doing a little thinking for themselves. Instead of believing every site they read just because it says something bad about Obama..
Fearmongering and Hatemongering (with info put out by the Iranians :???: ) to further divide this country.. :roll: :cry: That's what makes me laugh/cry/vomit when some of these folks like the ranchhand's of the country call themselves "patriots"..... :mad:

As far as the Obama land grab-- Actually since the emotion has died down some-- the way I read the Wyoming decision is that it takes NO property from anyone... All it does is say that the Indians/Reservation have shown they can now handle their own environmental/EPA issues (instead of the federal EPA doing it for them)- and that on any environmental issue affecting land within 50 miles of the exterior boundary of the reservation they are to be allowed a say in the decision on that issue - if the tribe believes it could have an environmental effect on the reservation... The 50 mile area just so happens to include the town of Riverton (which is actually within the exterior boundaries of the Reservation)... Same as states are allowed to have a say on other states when an environmental issue is within a certain distance of their border and may effect those of the other state ...

Some may prefer to deal with the Federal EPA rather than the Tribes- but actually this is giving more of the decision making that the Fed EPA has been doing- back to the locals (which in this case just so happens to be the Windriver Indian Reservation)

A ranger friend of mine who deals with such issues told me : " As far as the Clean air act, the Nez Perce Tribe where I live are the entity that applies and oversees the US law. This is nothing more than allowing the Tribe to implement the US law. Impacts? Now instead of me getting a burn permit to reduce slash piles from the County or EPA, the Tribe issues them and coordinates smoke issues with neighboring counties and states - there is no "Rights" take over. It is simply an implementation of the US law using US authority and US policy."
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
I thought maybe it would scare OT into leaving Montana for the rest of us. This is what we put up with from you OT about Bush and the R's. :eek: :shock: :roll:

Fearmongering and Hatemongering (with info put out by the Iranians Say what? ) to further divide this country.. Rolling Eyes Crying or Very sad That's what makes me laugh/cry/vomit when some of these folks like the ranchhand's of the country call themselves "patriots"..... Mad
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
I don't do face book like you OT. So cry in your beer about Bush raping the country, the Tea Party people dividing the country. I could go on and on ....still laughing it pissed you off.
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
Ot I think with the people wanting the Buffalo Commons, the Yellowstone to the Yukon are going to have to start removing people from their land. I don't think it will get done in this generation, but look at your area and what they are doing. Free roaming buffalo and the buying up of land for the Buffalo commons is doing it one place at a time.
:mad: Does this not bother you or do you feel some other generation can worry about it?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
ranch hand said:
Ot I think with the people wanting the Buffalo Commons, the Yellowstone to the Yukon are going to have to start removing people from their land. I don't think it will get done in this generation, but look at your area and what they are doing. Free roaming buffalo and the buying up of land for the Buffalo commons is doing it one place at a time.
:mad: Does this not bother you or do you feel some other generation can worry about it?

Yep- but its happening all over the state and has been for years... How do you keep people with lots of money from buying something from someone else who would like to have some of that money ? Isn't that what true conservatives support- capitalism at its best...

Comically on this Iranian post about Obama giving away that section of Montana- some long time Montanans on FB said it really wouldn't matter that much -- as most of its been taken over by Californicators, treehuggers, and little gonaded out of staters that moved here because they want to feel big by being able to own/pack a gun....
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
ranch hand said:
Ot I think with the people wanting the Buffalo Commons, the Yellowstone to the Yukon are going to have to start removing people from their land. I don't think it will get done in this generation, but look at your area and what they are doing. Free roaming buffalo and the buying up of land for the Buffalo commons is doing it one place at a time.
:mad: Does this not bother you or do you feel some other generation can worry about it?

Yep- but its happening all over the state and has been for years... How do you keep people with lots of money from buying something from someone else who would like to have some of that money ? Isn't that what true conservatives support- capitalism at its best...

Comically on this Iranian post about Obama giving away that section of Montana- some long time Montanans on FB said it really wouldn't matter that much -- as most of its been taken over by Californicators, treehuggers, and little gonaded out of staters that moved here because they want to feel big by being able to own/pack a gun....

little gonaded This why you pack heat? :lol: :lol:
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Funny how just the other day on TV they were talking about how pre-Obama when people heard some of these conspiracy people they just wrote them off as wingnuts. But since Benghazi and the video lie, Obamacare and the if you like it you can keep it lie, the IRS targeting , the NSA snooping, Fast and Furious DOJ illegal gun running, and countless other Obama Administration screw ups, people are starting to think maybe these Conspiracy nutcases are NOT SO CRAZY AFTER ALL.

The sad part of this is more and more people look at Obama and realize they can NOT TRUST HIM to tell them the truth and that goes for anyone that is out on the talk shows talking on his behalf. They spew the lies and never look back to the effects on the American people and the world. When it is proven they lied they just make up another lie to somehow excuse the first lie. But the SADDEST part is people are still stupid enough to reward these morally corrupt people with 4 more years to further destroy the US and any chance it has to pull itself away from the fiscal cliff.

SO warning don't write off some of these conspiracy people they might be the one actually telling you the truth unlike Obama.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
ranch hand said:
OT we could start by voting for people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?

You and the Tams of the world doing enough beeching, whining, and crying about the Dems- I don't need to...
I enjoy showing that the radical right is often as bad or worse then the looney left....
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
I meant voting out so edited it to show that. You are the looney left and would never say anything bad about it. What has Obama done you like and what has he done you don't like?

Here is something's you can comment on.
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2014/01/26/judge-jeanine-president-obama-%E2%80%98-master-contradiction%E2%80%99
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
ranch hand said:
OT we could start by voting for people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?

You and the Tams of the world doing enough beeching, whining, and crying about the Dems- I don't need to...
I enjoy showing that the radical right is often as bad or worse then the looney left....

OH come on Oldtimer I'm still waiting for you to defend your hero Obama's LIE OF THE YEAR about how you can keep your healthcare plan in the light of the fact MILLIONS have lost their plans due to his healthcare government take over. Has the right destroyed 1/6 of the US economy with a LIE?

How about defending the fact the Democrat Senate report laid the blame for Benghazi at the feet of Hillary and her incompetence at Sec of State? Has anyone on the Right lied about the cause of a terrorist attack that resulted in the PREVENTABLE DEATHS OF FOUR AMERICANS?

How about trying to defend the IRS targeting being investigated by a Obama Donor? Let's face it this is like the Obama White House investigating their involvement in the selling of Obama's Senate seat Remember that Oldtimer. Nope nobody in Obama's White House was involved in that scandal either at least as far as we know because THEY INVESTIGATED THEMSELVES. Would anyone on the right have gotten away like the LEFT HAS?

How about defending Obama appointee a tax cheat to the Treasury? How many KNOWN TAX CHEATS were appointed by a Republican President?

NO

How about defending Obama appointing a large campaign donor that knows nothing about Norway to be the Ambassador of that country? Would the left allow the right to invoke the nuclear option to get radical nominees appointed without a 60 vote?

NO

How About defending Obama doing recess appointment while the Senate is not in recess? We know the left would not allow it as Reid intentionally never recess the Senate to stop Bush from making recess appointment didn't he?

No

How about defending the income inequality that Obama keeps claiming he is going to fix BUT has gotten worse under him?


NO

How about defending Obama not knowing his signature bill was NOT READY to be rolled out but going out and telling people buying Healthcare on his website is going to be like going to Amazon and buying something?

No

How about defending Obama telling everyone the website was going to be fixed in 6 weeks after the totally botched roll out when it took more than three years to build what was not working and the back half of the website hadn't even been started?

No

How about defending the HHS Sec. claiming everything is running smoothly then releasing a memo that claims if the new contractor can't get the website fixed by March, which was months after Obama and his HHS SEC said it would be fixed, it could bankrupt insurance companies and destroy the US Healthcare system?

No

If you will not defend these issues how about defend Obama claiming he is going to fix the US foreign reputation that Bush supposedly ruined and the US, under Obama, has become a laughing stock to the rest of the world? The US enemies are laughing and the US Allies are backing away as they don't trust the Administration to live up to the talk. I guess this is what you get when you drawn a red line in the sand and then when the enemy jumps over the line with both feet your reaction is to MOVE THE LINE.

No

How about defending the Dems claiming Bush lied about Saddam having WMD in the light of these?

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Oldtimer when you can defend your vote for Obama then you can come back and tell the rest of us we were wrong in seeing your hero as a COMPLETE FAILURE. :roll:
 

jigs

Well-known member
the fat pompous ignorant one term sheriff will NEVER man up to stand behind his words. he is a coward, a drunkard, and an embarrassment to America.... much like that ignorant f-tard in the White House....

Oldtimer, you need to act like an old indian......grad a handful of beef jerky, and wander off into the wood, because you are no longer an asset to the tribe....
 

Tam

Well-known member
I think we all know Oldtimer left Political Bull as he could not longer defend his support for Obama/the Dems without nasty name calling and bigger lying on his part. It more than likely why many of the left have disappeared from the site. But I find it COMICAL that he now thinks he can come back and JUST bash the right without having to go back and defend his previous stands on issues. :roll:
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
ranch hand said:
OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?

Excellent points! Both party's have betrayed the constitution and most legislators are guilty of treason.

Sadly it'll probably take armed patriots---just like in the beginning---to get u.s. back on track.
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
ranch hand said:
OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?

Excellent points! Both party's have betrayed the constitution and most legislators are guilty of treason.

Sadly it'll probably take armed patriots---just like in the beginning---to get u.s. back on track.

Careful Little Joe, OT will start calling you a anarchist rightwingernut loomie.
Just sayin' :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
ranch hand said:
OT we could start by voting out people that use tax payer money, like state, blm and Fish and Game, to buy lands that will be used against us. They take these lands off the taxroll for the counties, pilt money is a tax payer donation too. You complained about the world coming to an end when Bush was in and the R's were going to do this and that, why silent on what the D's are doing?

Excellent points! Both party's have betrayed the constitution and most legislators are guilty of treason.

Sadly it'll probably take armed patriots---just like in the beginning---to get u.s. back on track.

How about you take a step back from your guns before the NSA, IRS, FBI and the DOJ are all sitting on your doorstep investigating what kind of tooth paste you use :roll:

Then in the next election vote those abusing power out, pick a person that believes in time limits and in going to DC to make a difference not a career of it. As long as they are looking to be there for a long time you can bet they can be bought off by the money that keeps them there. It is time to limit the damage they do by limiting the time the have to do it.
 
Top