• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

OT

Whitewing

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Oldtimer said:
Here's the hearing where the allegations and the alterations were shown the committee... Never proven- because Pelosi would not allow impeachment preferring to go thru the election process ( which she was probably right with )...

This is also very interesting hearing because it is the one where Tammy Baldwin gave her speech about the expanding Presidential powers being like new tools put in a carpenters tool box-- and once Congress allows those tools to be put in the tool box- it becomes very difficult to deny the next President those same tools... And that what the Congress (Repubs in particular) had been and was now doing in allowing GW to go unchallenged on many issues might come back to bite them in the butt...

And darned if it hasn't...

http://www.c-span.org/video/?280000-1/constitutional-limits-executive-power


OT, that video is 6 hours long. Could you give me an idea where on the video is presented the evidence that Bush altered NSA reports given to Congress? That's the only thing I'm interested in seeing.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
Whitewing said:
Oldtimer said:
Here's the hearing where the allegations and the alterations were shown the committee... Never proven- because Pelosi would not allow impeachment preferring to go thru the election process ( which she was probably right with )...

This is also very interesting hearing because it is the one where Tammy Baldwin gave her speech about the expanding Presidential powers being like new tools put in a carpenters tool box-- and once Congress allows those tools to be put in the tool box- it becomes very difficult to deny the next President those same tools... And that what the Congress (Repubs in particular) had been and was now doing in allowing GW to go unchallenged on many issues might come back to bite them in the butt...

And darned if it hasn't...

http://www.c-span.org/video/?280000-1/constitutional-limits-executive-power


OT, that video is 6 hours long. Could you give me an idea where on the video is presented the evidence that Bush altered NSA reports given to Congress? That's the only thing I'm interested in seeing.

I didn't watch the whole hearing either- but believe it is in the second half-- after 3 hour.... But during much of the testimony they brought up the allegations of how the Administration lied to Congress and other acts they thought were grounds for impeachment....
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Whitewing said:
Whitewing said:
OT, that video is 6 hours long. Could you give me an idea where on the video is presented the evidence that Bush altered NSA reports given to Congress? That's the only thing I'm interested in seeing.

I didn't watch the whole hearing either- but believe it is in the second half-- after 3 hour.... But during much of the testimony they brought up the allegations of how the Administration lied to Congress and other acts they thought were grounds for impeachment....

Wow, such news. Donks claiming that Bush lied and people died.

OT, you've made the very specific claim that Bush altered NSA reports sent to congress. I've never been able to find a single word re such a claim on the internet.....NOT ONE WORD......even though Bush was investigated for everything from lying about WMDs to stepping on ducklings.

Where in this 6 hours of donks going off on Bush is the claim? Stop being so damned obtuse.

And finally, what the fark does Pelosi not going forward with impeachment proceedings have to do with the crimes of Bush being investigated or not? NOTHING. If there was a credible claim that Bush altered NSA reports sent to congress, there would have been a thousand reporters on that trail, no?

I think you're blowing smoke out your ass again.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Ever wonder how many pages a thread would be that included every false claim he made on here?

We should probably start one. I bet it wouldn't take any time at all to make the longest thread crown on the political board.

Too bad this board is hidden, with a little exposure, I bet it could get him some kind of recognition by the far left democratic party.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
Whitewing said:
Why must one be a member to see this forum anyway?

Because of all OT's lying and name-calling. It looked bad to the outside World, and gave Ranchers a bad name

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I gave Ranchers a bad name!!! :lol: :lol:
 

Steve

Well-known member
the impeachment talk is being fueled by desperate liberals, as a distraction.. They want to change the subject..

sadly some conservative have fell into the trap .. mainly because there are many valid allegations, enough to have a trial and convict in the house..

but doing so only plays into the liberals endgame..

that is why the media is covering "the talk" of impeachment..
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Whitewing said:
Why must one be a member to see this forum anyway?

Because of all OT's lying and name-calling. It looked bad to the outside World, and gave Ranchers a bad name

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I gave Ranchers a bad name!!! :lol: :lol:

Neither a bad name nor an answer to my question. At least you're consistent.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Whitewing said:
Why must one be a member to see this forum anyway?

Because of all OT's lying and name-calling. It looked bad to the outside World, and gave Ranchers a bad name

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I gave Ranchers a bad name!!! :lol: :lol:

Absolutely. All the "Rural" folks I show this website to call you the most hated/hateful man on the internet. But on the other hand, the "Urban" folks say you're the dumbest. Which is it? :wink:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Mike said:
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Because of all OT's lying and name-calling. It looked bad to the outside World, and gave Ranchers a bad name

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I gave Ranchers a bad name!!! :lol: :lol:

Absolutely. All the "Rural" folks I show this website to call you the most hated/hateful man on the internet. But on the other hand, the "Urban" folks say you're the dumbest. Which is it? :wink:

Easily the most bigoted I've ever encountered and I've encountered some real winners in that regard.
 
Top