• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Out of touch Government

Larrry

Well-known member
The Art of the Ann Arbor City BudgetBy Tom Gantert | July 22, 2010
The debate in Ann Arbor, where firefighters are being laid off due to a multimillion dollar budget deficit, is over an $850,000 piece of art.

That's how much the city has agreed to pay German artist Herbert Dreiseitl for a three-piece water sculpture that would go in front of the new police and courts building right by the City Hall.

The city has the money to do it because in 2007, it agreed to set aside for public art 1 percent of money that went into capital improvement projects that were $100,000 or larger. Most capital projects involve streets, sewers and water.

Ann Arbor City Council member Stephen Kunselman, a Democrat, opposed the art deal.

"I think it is incredibly insensitive," Kunselman said. "It is insensitive to the staff and their morale. It is insensitive to the community. There are people out there struggling financially, and here we are spending a large amount of money on a piece of art."

Kunselman said the city is also eliminating the solid waste coordinator from the budget, which oversees trash pickup, and hiring an art coordinator.

City Administrator Roger Fraser wrote in an e-mail that the solid waste coordinator position was eliminated as a cost-cutting measure because the solid waste millage had decreased. Fraser wrote that the art coordinator position would be paid for by the public art fund.

Fraser noted that the public art dollars did not come from the city's general fund, which is used to pay salaries and benefits, and that less than $6,000 of the art money came from the general fund.

The art projects also must have a "thematic connection" to the source of funding, Fraser wrote. The $850,000 art project is water-themed, because the money came from storm water funds.

But some critics say that a city creative enough to fund art from storm water projects should be able to find money to cover essential city services.

"That's the classic argument," said Glenn Thompson, an Ann Arbor resident and longtime critic of city spending. "But the city has become very, very good at shuffling money in and out of the general fund when they want. These people are very good at putting it in and out of the general fund when they wish."

Michael LaFaive, the director of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy's Morey Fiscal Policy Initiative said nonessential services are being funded throughout the state.

"Administrators cry poverty while lavishing money on the beautiful people," LaFaive said. "The threat to dismiss firefighters often comes while officials protect golf courses, wave pools and art. No city can cry poverty while it defends recreation and aesthetics such as art."

LaFaive said administrators get creative with budgets to fund pet projects.

"It doesn't mean officials can't find ways to redirect the money," LaFaive said. "It appears on the surface that they are redefining what a capital improvement is, by designing a sculpture instead of true municipal infrastructure projects such as roads and bridges."

http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/13219

7d435d2a4fd35a6fe9afce1b653690fdfda1a69.gif
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Good question, lonecowboy.
I have a friend in California who is a member of the Tea
Party there. She sent me the following in an email:

Our members stopped the local mayors from voting to send a letter opposing Arizona's Law last week! These local elected officials are not used to having an audience. Our group are planning to have people at every public meeting. They will be watched like. Hawks! We had at least 70 at our meeting tonight. We all wrote THANK YOU letters to those mayors that voted against it!
----------------------------------------------------

The Tea Party members are making a difference!
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
Good question, lonecowboy.
I have a friend in California who is a member of the Tea
Party there. She sent me the following in an email:

Our members stopped the local mayors from voting to send a letter opposing Arizona's Law last week! These local elected officials are not used to having an audience. Our group are planning to have people at every public meeting. They will be watched like. Hawks! We had at least 70 at our meeting tonight. We all wrote THANK YOU letters to those mayors that voted against it!
----------------------------------------------------

The Tea Party members are making a difference!

"Grass roots" as they say. These people are scaring the hell out of donks on a national level and the donks are wise to be afraid, very afraid.
 

Steve

Well-known member
art dollars did not come from the city's general fund,

must be magic money.. or it came from the taxpayers in one form of another...


to fund Art and fire working class people is not a fiscal conservative policy... but it is a liberal elitist agenda..
 
Top