• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Pentagon Destroys Copies of Controversial Memoir

A

Anonymous

Guest
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/25/pentagon-destroys-copies-controversial-memoir-written-army-officer/


Pentagon Destroys Copies of Controversial Memoir Written by Army Officer
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
loomixguy said:
What does that have to do with the jews? Or do the jews now control our army as well?

muslim vs. jews

who did 9/11....

his book beings to show i am right. the military had to destroy the books....atta was cia agent.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
The article you pasted doesn't mention the CIA, Atta, jews, Mossad, poligrip, or who did 9/11. You are making these claims, but how do you tie it all together, besides in your own atrophied mind?

Best thing you could do today, shamwow, is get some Fukken wax and apply it to your vehicle. Then, you will have something to show proof positive results about. Oh, it's real...it's damn real.....
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
loomixguy said:
The article you pasted doesn't mention the CIA, Atta, jews, Mossad, poligrip, or who did 9/11. You are making these claims, but how do you tie it all together, besides in your own atrophied mind?

Best thing you could do today, shamwow, is get some Fukken wax and apply it to your vehicle. Then, you will have something to show proof positive results about. Oh, it's real...it's damn real.....


He's going to tell you that he was also a member of an intelligence operation named "Able Danger" and how "Able Danger" pegged Atta as a security risk before 911.

In 2004, after Colonel Shaffer returned from another brief assignment in Afghanistan, D.I.A. officials charged him with violating several agency rules, including claiming excessive expenses for a trip to Fort Dix, N.J. Despite the D.I.A. accusations, which resulted in the revocation of his security clearance, the Army promoted him to lieutenant colonel from major in 2005. He was effectively fired in 2006 by D.I.A., which said he could not stay on without a clearance, and now works at a Washington research group, the Center for Advanced Defense Studies.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Do not sich things written on an agencies time belong to them?
Try getting a patent on something that you developed on company time and see what happens :wink: :wink: :wink:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
hopalong said:
Do not sich things written on an agencies time belong to them?
Try getting a patent on something that you developed on company time and see what happens :wink: :wink: :wink:


I don't think it was written on "company" time, but it is a matter of National Security.

I believe all memoirs need to be passed by military brass. this book was by the Army, but the NIA did not approve it originally.

If you think about it, the author, shouldn't have a problem with it, if he/she respects the oath they took.

There's lots of information that the general public, or enemy, should not be privy to, in the name of National Security.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Here's some of the "secrets" that were redacted and that shamoo thinks will prove his point about 911. :lol:

WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency, headquarters for the government’s eavesdroppers and code breakers, has been located at Fort Meade, Md., for half a century. Its nickname, the Fort, has been familiar for decades to neighbors and government workers alike.

nickname redacted.

Another supposed secret removed from the second printing: the location of the Central Intelligence Agency’s training facility — Camp Peary, Va.

wikipedia knows this "secret" too.





And the name and abbreviation of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, routinely mentioned in news articles. And the fact that Sigint means “signals intelligence.”

I think this one proves shamoo's conspiracy theories, for sure.


Not only did the Pentagon black out Colonel Shaffer’s cover name in Afghanistan, Chris Stryker, it deleted the source of his pseudonym: the name of John Wayne’s character in the 1949 movie “The Sands of Iwo Jima.”


Maybe John Wayne had the secrets shamoo is looking for. :lol:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Funny the Government will censor one book in the name of national Security and not another. When the book "Obama's War" came out it contained some sensitive information and when a reporter asked Gibbs why the White allowed the information out, there was no reasonable explanation.

Some say it was just as sensitive as the information the wikileaks was posting on the web when the Obama Administration went after them. The only difference it seems is Wikileak used a military guy to get the info and the author of Obama's War had the Obama Admin. leaking the info directly to him. I would have to wonder just what NATIONAL SECURITY means to Obama when he allows his White House to leak sensitive information.

I hear he didn't mind the book as it pointed out how he was against the Afganistan war. I guess he was hoping it would get him back in good with the Left wingnuts of his party if they could read how he stood up against the Generals that wanted more troops.

I doubt anyone is going to forget his comment about his stand on the war though. As it seems he is more worried about loosing the whole Democrat Party than he is about National Security and the Troops he is putting in harms way. :mad:
 
Top