With some even calling others 'liars", because they will not agree that Svoboda only won 1...
hypocritexposer said:Steve they are known as Svoboda, and they changed it awhile ago to All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda", from The Social-National Party of Ukraine
They and most others still refer to them as Svoboda. That's why all their promotional material has Svoboda on it.
I wonder what that says behind Tyagnibok?
![]()
But in an interview in the downtown office building that Svoboda shares with an insurance company and a dental clinic named Smile, Mr. Tyagnibok said that fear of his party was misplaced and the accusations of racism and extremism unfounded.
“Svoboda is not an anti-Semitic party,” he said, seated behind a desk, a sport jacket stretched by his barrel-sized chest, his huge hands folded in front of him, speaking slowly and firmly in Ukrainian. “Svoboda is not a xenophobic party. Svoboda is not an anti-Russian party. Svoboda is not an anti-European party. Svoboda is simply and only a pro-Ukrainian party. And that’s it.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/09/world/europe/ukraines-ultranationalists-do-well-in-elections.html?pagewanted=all
Steve said:the "picture" is not correct..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_parliament_of_Ukraine,_2007%E2%80%9312
hypocritexposer said:
The Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW)
Analyses
2012-11-07
Tadeusz A. Olszański
The parliamentary elections held in Ukraine on 28 October were won by the Party of Regions (PR), although they obtained far fewer votes than five years ago, and did not win an absolute majority in parliament. The total vote for the opposition parties (United Opposition Batkivshchyna [Fatherland], UDAR [STRIKE] and Svoboda [Freedom]) in the proportional elections was higher than that of the ruling party, which won 30% compared to the opposition’s 49.9% (see Appendix 1)
hypocritexposer said:Steve said:the "picture" is not correct..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_parliament_of_Ukraine,_2007%E2%80%9312
Of course not, it doesn't match your link to members from 2007-2012, that's for sure.
:lol:
Between 2004 and 2010, party membership increased threefold to 15,000
hypocritexposer said:
The Social-National Party of Ukraine changed its name to the All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" in February 2004 with the arrival of Oleh Tyahnybok as party leader.[2] Tyahnybok made significant efforts to moderate the party's extremist image.[39] The party not only replaced its name, but also abandoned the "I + N" ("Idea Natsii" ukr. "idea of a nation") Wolfsangel logo (a symbol popular among neo-Nazi groups)[2][27] with a three-fingered hand reminiscent of the 'Tryzub' pro-independence gesture of the late 1980s.
hypocritexposer said:https://twitter.com/vo_svoboda
The Social-National Party of Ukraine changed its name to the All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda" in February 2004 with the arrival of Oleh Tyahnybok as party leader.[2] Tyahnybok made significant efforts to moderate the party's extremist image.[39] The party not only replaced its name, but also abandoned the "I + N" ("Idea Natsii" ukr. "idea of a nation") Wolfsangel logo (a symbol popular among neo-Nazi groups)[2][27] with a three-fingered hand reminiscent of the 'Tryzub' pro-independence gesture of the late 1980s.
![]()
Steve said:ok a protest in san fran.. someone speaking in a foreign language and a protester demanding Putin get out of the Ukraine..
so what.
if you have some relevant point to make.. make it
otherwise whatever.
same post posted a few dozen times an d a twitter screenshot..
so what..
hypocritexposer said:Steve said:ok a protest in san fran.. someone speaking in a foreign language and a protester demanding Putin get out of the Ukraine..
so what.
if you have some relevant point to make.. make it
otherwise whatever.
same post posted a few dozen times an d a twitter screenshot..
so what..
to translate them I would have to care..
so far you have a quote
and a few pictures..
so what. it is just a flag.. just a word and just blue flag..
it doesn't make them bad or change their name..
you mean you can't translate those? that kinda puts you at a disadvantage
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
― James Madison, The Constitution of the United States of America
“A free people ought...to be armed”
― George Washington
“Disarm the people- that is the best and most effective way to enslave them.”
― James Madison
“I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters.”
― Frank Lloyd Wright
“[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”
― James Madison
praise the lord and pass the ammunition .. and we will all stay FREE