A comment to SH, "I understand GIPSA did all they could to NOT to investigate. So does Tom Harkin, Joan Waterford, Saxby Chambliss, etc... You commented that nothing was wrong there."
SH's accusation, "You liar! I commented that nothing had been PROVEN wrong there. A political allegation that makes packer blamers happy is not proof. I want to hear GIPSA's side of the argument rather than being a packer blaming lemming."
My followup, "Here's a reminder of what you said, SH, on 2/9/06, "There is nothing wrong with how GIPSA is being run."
I think you owe me an apology, SH. I don't see the word "proven" anywhere in your comment of 2/9/06. You called me a liar - it rather looks like you're just flapping your lips with your usual nonsense again.
A penny for your thoughts? (take it, it's a nickel more than they're worth). :lol: