Sandhusker
Well-known member
SH, we had this exchange on Dec. 5
SH, "What has Dittmer stated that is not true Sandbag? Any parasite can make discrediting allegations but it takes integrity to back them. Dittmer just displayed R-CULT leader statements for everyone to see and the positions of their "anti beef" consumer group cohorts.
My reply, "Why, SH, are you tring to discredit me by calling me "Sandbag"? Maybe a little school yard bullying? I'm not sure which staff member of the "foundation" came up with these gems; whether is was the President, Vice President, Head Reporter or subordinate, or even the janitor - no wait, isn't Dittmer all of these? Oh, yeah, he IS the "foundation"!
OK, Mr. "My only bias is the truth", direct from the "foundation's" website;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banned would be:
Alliances of ranchers, feeders, breed associations, packers and retailers
Branded beef
Packer/feeder contracts and grids
A group in the drastic minority like R-CALF that wants to see the above kinds of things come to pass has to find some way to get leverage.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More gems on what R-CALF supposedly is going along with;
Only "sustainable" agriculture would be permitted. This means selling only fresh food locally, not out of state and not internationally, using organic methods -- no herbicides, pesticides, antibiotics, feed additives or genetically modified plants or animals allowed.
USDA and other government agencies would be run by those with no agricultural experience to "bias" their decisions. Representatives from consumer activist groups, environmental groups, faith-based groups and unions would run USDA. People who had worked for NCBA or food corporations would be considered unfit for service.
Packing companies and retailers would become union shops.
Foreign trade would be discouraged, since they see it taking away jobs, especially union jobs, in this country. The U.S. should just provide increased government aid to poor countries to help their economies, rather than trade with them. They feel trade with us damages farmers in poor countries.
Corporate trading companies should be broken up and government trading agencies created to sell America's agricultural products. The large food, agricultural, drug and ag chemical companies would be broken up in favor of small non-corporate companies, government marketing agencies and local food coops.
Large feedyards - defined as more than 1,000 head - are termed "factory farms" and would be banned as too damaging to the environment and too inhumane for animals
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, just 5 months past, your comments, "Diversion! What have you brought to the table to prove Dittmer wrong? "ILLUSIONS" I presume!
DIVERSION! What did Dittmer say, about R-CALF, that is not true?"
To refresh your memory, I posted, " I have posted Dittmer's inaccuracies here several times. SH knows this as he even replied to several of my posts."
And, again, you squealed, "DIVERSION! "
Now I ask you and anybody who has the displeasure to read this, is the reason you kept asking for proof again because you simply forgot our previous exchange? Are these direct quotes taken from his website (which anybody can check to see if my post is correct) more of these "ILLUSIONS" you accuse me of constantly? Exacatly what was I diverting from? Can you even spell "credibility".
Stay tuned for more, I've got more of your gems to show those that think anything you say can be taken seriously.
SH, "What has Dittmer stated that is not true Sandbag? Any parasite can make discrediting allegations but it takes integrity to back them. Dittmer just displayed R-CULT leader statements for everyone to see and the positions of their "anti beef" consumer group cohorts.
My reply, "Why, SH, are you tring to discredit me by calling me "Sandbag"? Maybe a little school yard bullying? I'm not sure which staff member of the "foundation" came up with these gems; whether is was the President, Vice President, Head Reporter or subordinate, or even the janitor - no wait, isn't Dittmer all of these? Oh, yeah, he IS the "foundation"!
OK, Mr. "My only bias is the truth", direct from the "foundation's" website;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Banned would be:
Alliances of ranchers, feeders, breed associations, packers and retailers
Branded beef
Packer/feeder contracts and grids
A group in the drastic minority like R-CALF that wants to see the above kinds of things come to pass has to find some way to get leverage.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More gems on what R-CALF supposedly is going along with;
Only "sustainable" agriculture would be permitted. This means selling only fresh food locally, not out of state and not internationally, using organic methods -- no herbicides, pesticides, antibiotics, feed additives or genetically modified plants or animals allowed.
USDA and other government agencies would be run by those with no agricultural experience to "bias" their decisions. Representatives from consumer activist groups, environmental groups, faith-based groups and unions would run USDA. People who had worked for NCBA or food corporations would be considered unfit for service.
Packing companies and retailers would become union shops.
Foreign trade would be discouraged, since they see it taking away jobs, especially union jobs, in this country. The U.S. should just provide increased government aid to poor countries to help their economies, rather than trade with them. They feel trade with us damages farmers in poor countries.
Corporate trading companies should be broken up and government trading agencies created to sell America's agricultural products. The large food, agricultural, drug and ag chemical companies would be broken up in favor of small non-corporate companies, government marketing agencies and local food coops.
Large feedyards - defined as more than 1,000 head - are termed "factory farms" and would be banned as too damaging to the environment and too inhumane for animals
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, just 5 months past, your comments, "Diversion! What have you brought to the table to prove Dittmer wrong? "ILLUSIONS" I presume!
DIVERSION! What did Dittmer say, about R-CALF, that is not true?"
To refresh your memory, I posted, " I have posted Dittmer's inaccuracies here several times. SH knows this as he even replied to several of my posts."
And, again, you squealed, "DIVERSION! "
Now I ask you and anybody who has the displeasure to read this, is the reason you kept asking for proof again because you simply forgot our previous exchange? Are these direct quotes taken from his website (which anybody can check to see if my post is correct) more of these "ILLUSIONS" you accuse me of constantly? Exacatly what was I diverting from? Can you even spell "credibility".
Stay tuned for more, I've got more of your gems to show those that think anything you say can be taken seriously.