SH, " Sandman keeps suggesting that R-CALF is not against trade and continues to try to smooth over the Canadians with cheap talk yet ignores the fact that R-CALF flied a dumping case against Canada that they lost and called their beef "HIGH RISK" and "CONTAMINATED" in a Washington Post add and court documents."
My reply; Filing a dumping case does not mean you're anti-trade. The US Goverment has also filed anti-dumping cases - does that mean they are against trade as well?
SH, diverting from the topic of what filing an anti-dumping case might mean "You fool nobody. R-CALF wants to stop Canadian imports, period. That is not even debateable."
My reply; "Now you divert. Does filing anti-dumping cases really mean you are anti-trade? You don't like examples that show how foolish you are, do you?"
SH, "In R-CALF's case, yes! "
You see folks, SH has certain rules that only apply to R-CALF. R-CALF files an anti-dumping case and they are anti-trade. However, the same doesn't apply to anybody else.
Speaking of anti-trade, I pulled some press release headlines from R-CALF's website. Do these look like the releases from an outfit that is anti-trade?;
Korea FTA Could Provide Substantial Benefits to U.S. Cattle Producers
Cattle Producers Support Oman FTA in Testimony Before U.S. Senate Finance Committee
Trade Opportunities and Risks for 2006
Cattle Producers Urge Congress to Support Bahrain Free Trade Agreement
I get called a liar, deceiver, etc... on a near daily basis. I ask who is lying and deceiving?