SH's comments on me, "He thinks low cattle prices after the checkoff was initiated is proof that that the checkoff hasn't done any good as if the checkoff was the only factor affecting cattle markets during that period of time which included the $8 hog era. Real brilliant guy" and "you make allegations that I claimed the checkoff was solely responsible for demand after I have mentioned the Adkins diet how many times"
Folks, this is exactly what I said, " I suggest you compare the number of years the checkoff has been operational and how many of those same years beef demand increased/decreased."
I followed that comment with, "I was simply pointing out that one could not point at the checkoff as being a great demand maker when demand actually decreased most of the time."
Now, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, would a rational person not needing the services of a good shrink reach the same conclusions and make the same statements as our excitable friend here? How can anybody take anything he says seriously - you see the thought process (or lack of) right here.
In case you haven't noticed, SH, you torked me off. I'm a pretty laid back guy and can blow a lot of things off, but I've endured enough personal attacks and childish taunts from you to last a while. I'm sick of being called a liar, twister, deceiver, etc... only to see you define those very terms with your posts.