• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Pigford vs. Glickman

Soapweed

Well-known member
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:59:39 -0500
Subject: PIGFORD vs. GLICKMAN...
From: [email protected]



The media portrayed poor Shirley Sherrod and the doctored tape. Now the
whole story and where is the media? She forgot to mention her $13 million
her FAMILY RECEIVED in payments from the DEPT of Agriculture in the Pigford
vs Glickman Case; a BIG BIG INVESTIGATION SHOULD ENSUE.

Now this one is worth sending to all of you good folks! Make sure you get
your Kids AND Grandkids and NEIGHBORS all "REGISTERED TO VOTE".

Please read this entire document it is - shocking and that's no BS - Pigford
vs Glickman.

Andrew Breitbart is a media genius! He proved it originally with his
brilliant handling of the ACORN 'hooker' scandal which he skillfully
manipulated so that the corrupt organization would be exposed as one of
Obama's most powerful political support groups. But Breitbart's handing of
that affair is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley
Sherrod 'white farmer' scandal.

It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror,
Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his "Big Government" site which
showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture
laughing to a roomful of NAACP members about how she'd discriminated against
a destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he
desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she'd sent him instead to a
white lawyer - 'one of his own kind' - for help.

The black woman was Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately she became the
center of a firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country.
Within a day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of
Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded - and received - Sherrod's
resignation.

Breitbart had won.

But then seemingly Breitbart's actions began to explode in his face. As
Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her
speech. And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly repenting of her
racism against a white farmer and instead championing his fight to win funds
to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of that entire tape being revealed,
the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart. Conservatives throughout
the country were enraged that he'd endangered their reputations by releasing
a 'doctored' tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to the
conservative media.

I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and
stupidity of Breitbart in 'doctoring' a tape to make a supposedly innocent
woman look guilty. But now I discover I have been as guilty of haste to
judgment of Breitbart as the Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod .

Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart's release of that
tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into exposing
one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal government -
a little known legal case called "Pigford v. Glickman".

"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of
Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to
racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997." The case was
entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black farmers won their
case. The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to
settle their claims.

But then on February 23, 2010, something shocking happened in relation to
that original judgment: In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more
funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering...... $1.25 billion. This
was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers - had
now.... swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black
farmers throughout America .

There was only one teensy problem: The United States of America doesn't
have 86,000 black farmers! According to accurate and totally verifiable
Official USDA 2007 Census data, the total number of black farmers throughout
America is only 39,697. Hmmm... by the Official USDA 1992 Census data the
US had only 18,816 black farmers!! Oops!

Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent 86,000
claims? And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks,
you'll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because
of her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" but
whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13 million)
from that action - Shirley Sherrod. Oops again!

Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United
States - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the
government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more
interesting.

Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this
race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford v. Glickman"
in 1999 only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers. But.... in
2008, a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more
black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama .

Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a
worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race
claim.

But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010 , he cleverly laid a
trap which Sherrod - and Obama + his cronies- stumbled headfirst into which
has now resulted in the entire world discovering the existence of this
corrupt financial judgment.

As for Ms. Sherrod ? Well, she's discovering too late that her cry of
'racism' to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart
has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and the huge corruption.
Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it seems, have come
home to roost. Oink!

But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to unlawful
claims & corruption.... is still trying to fool all of US.

Google and read for yourself "Pigford vs. Glickman or
http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/07/27/pigford-v-glickman-86000-clai
ms-from-39697-total-farmers/?singlepage=true
 

Mike

Well-known member
Thanks Soap, Everyone needs to study up on this case.

I have watched Pigford materialize from the very beginning.

There was a group of registered bull sellers that wined and dined some of the participants that received $50,000.00 in the settlement a few years back.

All of a sudden there were some black people who had 2-3 scrubby cows in the back yard that owned $4 - $6,000.00 BULLS. Not just ONE but TWO or THREE!!!!

The settlement was nothing but a vote buying scam for the Democrats. Same as welfare, food stamps, and medicare.

Have any of you heard of the "Crazy Checks"?
 
Top