• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Please explain.

A

Anonymous

Guest
What's the difference between a "citizen" and a "Natrual Born Citizen", the founders knew, do you?
hypocritexposer:
I do not know please elaborate so I will know. This may be something I need to know.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Sure Hurley

As with cattle breeds, there are different percentages that make up that breed of cow.

there are purebred, fullblood, crossbred etc.

The same is true of any American citizen

There's Natural, Native, Naturalized. They are all just classifications of citizens.

In the constitution the founding fathers thought it important to distinquish between those classifications, believing that it shows degrees of loyalty to the "new Country"

The president or commander in chief must be of the highest degree of loyalty, (one born in the US of 2 citizens)

Not that much different than breed associations really. Cattle have to be of a certain % to be registered in the "herdbook"

I should add that I understand that some breeds or associations realize that a breeder/owner of percentage cattle might be as loyal to the association as any other, so they have democratic votes, to amend their "constitutions" to allow those members to become "President" of that particular association.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
Sure Hurley

As with cattle breeds, there are different percentages that make up that breed of cow.

there are purebred, fullblood, crossbred etc.

The same is true of any American citizen


There's Natural, Native, Naturalized. They are all just classifications of citizens.

In the constitution the founding fathers thought it important to distinquish between those classifications, believing that it shows degrees of loyalty to the "new Country"

The president or commander in chief must be of the highest degree of loyalty, (one born in the US of 2 citizens)

Not that much different than breed associations really. Cattle have to be of a certain % to be registered in the "herdbook"

I should add that I understand that some breeds or associations realize that a breeder/owner of percentage cattle might be as loyal to the association as any other, so they have democratic votes, to amend their "constitutions" to allow those members to become "President" of that particular association.

Say What :???: So your saying- same as Hitler- that a person has to prove their Aryan bloodlines or that their relatives came over on the Mayflower to be a certain class citizen- or be a good loyal party member.. :???: Do we start making those that were not born in country- or don't have the perfect bloodlines you want- wear a certain badge identifying them too :???:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Don't try to twist my words, in your attempt to label me a racist.

Read what I said!

They believed that it showed the level of loyalty, which they thought important.

If you disagree then by all means, campaign and change what they wrote.

Do not misrepresent yourself to be included, in their classification.

If you want to be a girl guide, then campaign for the right, but be man enough to change the name, when you succeed!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Sure Hurley

As with cattle breeds, there are different percentages that make up that breed of cow.

there are purebred, fullblood, crossbred etc.

The same is true of any American citizen


There's Natural, Native, Naturalized. They are all just classifications of citizens.

In the constitution the founding fathers thought it important to distinquish between those classifications, believing that it shows degrees of loyalty to the "new Country"

The president or commander in chief must be of the highest degree of loyalty, (one born in the US of 2 citizens)

Not that much different than breed associations really. Cattle have to be of a certain % to be registered in the "herdbook"

I should add that I understand that some breeds or associations realize that a breeder/owner of percentage cattle might be as loyal to the association as any other, so they have democratic votes, to amend their "constitutions" to allow those members to become "President" of that particular association.

Say What :???: So your saying- same as Hitler- that a person has to prove their Aryan bloodlines or that their relatives came over on the Mayflower to be a certain class citizen- or be a good loyal party member.. :???: Do we start making those that were not born in country- or don't have the perfect bloodlines you want- wear a certain badge identifying them too :???:

Why take hypo's word for it? You know what the Constitution says. Your problem is with the guys who founded this country, not those of us who think they knew what they were doing and believe in following the law.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Wait a minute, wait a minute. I asked a simply question and only wanting to learn something. Did not mean to start a pizz fight.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
sorry Hurley if you thought I was trying to start a fight with my explanation of my understanding of this.

I will stand up for myself when falsely accused of being a racist though!
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Sure Hurley

As with cattle breeds, there are different percentages that make up that breed of cow.

there are purebred, fullblood, crossbred etc.

The same is true of any American citizen


There's Natural, Native, Naturalized. They are all just classifications of citizens.

In the constitution the founding fathers thought it important to distinquish between those classifications, believing that it shows degrees of loyalty to the "new Country"

The president or commander in chief must be of the highest degree of loyalty, (one born in the US of 2 citizens)

Not that much different than breed associations really. Cattle have to be of a certain % to be registered in the "herdbook"

I should add that I understand that some breeds or associations realize that a breeder/owner of percentage cattle might be as loyal to the association as any other, so they have democratic votes, to amend their "constitutions" to allow those members to become "President" of that particular association.

Say What :???: So your saying- same as Hitler- that a person has to prove their Aryan bloodlines or that their relatives came over on the Mayflower to be a certain class citizen- or be a good loyal party member.. :???: Do we start making those that were not born in country- or don't have the perfect bloodlines you want- wear a certain badge identifying them too :???:

Of all peope, the person who wants to be President of the United States of America should jump at the opportunity to refute frivilous claims about his place of birth, parenthood or anything else that would cloud his claim to be qualified for the position.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
sorry Hurley if you thought I was trying to start a fight with my explanation of my understanding of this.

I will stand up for myself when falsely accused of being a racist though!

Did not mean you. I appreciate the answer. I was mainly talking about OT. I did not see anything that called for his response.
 

Mike

Well-known member
hurleyjd said:
hypocritexposer said:
sorry Hurley if you thought I was trying to start a fight with my explanation of my understanding of this.

I will stand up for myself when falsely accused of being a racist though!

Did not mean you. I appreciate the answer. I was mainly talking about OT. I did not see anything that called for his response.

OT left out part of his response. He forgot to blame Bush for where Zer0 was or was not born. :shock:
 
Top