Hillary Clinton has not said whether she will run for president in 2016, but House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is praying she decides to give it a go.
"I pray that Hillary Clinton decides to run for president of the United States," Pelosi said during a panel discussion at the Clinton School of Public Service in Little Rock, Ark., according to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.
"Let's set aside for a moment the fact that she's a woman," said Pelosi, who has previously urged Clinton to seek the presidency in 2016. "As a person, she would be the most qualified person to enter the White House in modern history."
"Now, that she happens to be a woman - that is a spectacular thing," she added.
Pelosi says Hillary would be the most qualified in Modern History. So can any of the liberals hiding behind the curtain of shame explain to me what Hillary did as Senator that qualified her? I know she was a Senator longer that Obama but look how his Presidency is working out. And please don't tell me she dodged sniper fire while in a foreign country so that gives her battle field experience enough to be Commander and Chief as we all know that was a LIE. Oh and wasn't she a Senator when she was LYING about Saddam having WMD?
"In 1998, the United States also changed its underlying policy toward Iraq from containment to regime change and began to examine options to effect such a change, including support for Iraqi opposition leaders within the country and abroad. In the 4 years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaida members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.
"It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein wiill continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East which, as we know all too well, affects American security."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
Yes she was the Sec of State but please explain what she did as the Sec. of State that would erase the fact she denied additional security for an Ambassador and allowed him to be the first in over 20 years to be killed and LIED about it saying people under her denied the security when evidence shows she signed the denial.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, testifying in January 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations committee, said "...what difference at this point does it make?" Clinton was speaking about the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans.
Well, Hillary, it does make a difference, as we are now finding out. A report of findings of a Republican led committee accuses Clinton of "...seeking to cover up failures by the State Department that could have contributed to the attack last year that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans."
But why was the attack successful? Why was there not adequate security at the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya? As it turns out, it was Hillary Clinton who denied adequate security. Page 2 of the report has:
Senior State Department officials knew that the threat environment in Benghazi was high and that the Benghazi compound was vulnerable and unable to withstand an attack, yet the Department continued to systematically withdraw security personnel.
On page 5 of the report is this little nugget of information: "Prior to the Benghazi attacks, State Department officials in Libya made repeated requests for additional security that were denied in Washington despite ample documentation of the threat posed by violent extremist militias."
We get, on page 7 of the report, this: "...in a cable signed by Secretary Clinton in April 2012, the State Department settled on a plan to scale back security assets for the U.S. Mission in Libya, including Benghazi."
The report also makes this point:
Reductions of security levels prior to the attacks in Benghazi were approved at the highest levels of the State Department, up to and including highest levels of the State Department, up to and including Secretary Clinton. This fact contradicts her testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on January 23, 2013
Explain what she did that excused the fact she LIED to the American public about what caused the TERRORIST ATTACK that killed the Ambassador. As we all now know it was not a little seen video and we know she knew that from within minutes of the attack but she still spent 3 weeks pushing a LIE to protect her butt.
Please Explain what she did to excuse her comment about "What does it matter at this point why it happened" talking about the death of the Ambassador and three others that relied on HER to keep them safe or at least send help when the TERRORIST ATTACK happened in a TERRORIST ridden country that everyone with half a brain had already pulled their people out of. But she had not pulled her personel because it would not feed into the LIE she and Obama were pushing about having the terrorists on the run after killing Osama.
Oh and if being the first lady is her qualifications might we remember that she didn't have enough self respect to dump her publicly CHEATING dirtbag of a President husband when he was caught lying about his disgusting behavior with White House interns.
YEP Hillary is the most qualified in modern history just like Pelosi knew nothing about waterboarding until after it was carried out. :roll: One Liar promoting another LIAR, GOD HELP THE USA. :roll: