• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Poor little George

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Disagreeable

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
0
Did you know that George W. Bush will break Ronald Regan’s record for the most vacation taken by a president with this vacation? And he still has more than three years in this term!! But poor guy, you almost have to feel sorry for him; chased from his home by a bunch of old women! Link below; my emphasis.

“With anti-war protesters continuing their vigil outside President Bush’s ranch, the commander in chief began a five-day push Saturday to tell Americans why he thinks U.S. troops must continue the fight in Iraq.”

“Bush is making a sell to a skeptical public. According to recent polls, a majority of Americans do not approve of his handling of the war.”

As he has before when he has been challenged, Bush invoked the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in his radio address.”


--but today more Americans realize that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Makes Bush look like a fool to keep making this reference.


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050820/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush
 

Cal

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
3,598
Reaction score
0
Location
Southern SD
More polling data, more selectively pasted parts of an article, and more distortions. How typical.
 

passin thru

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
2,603
Reaction score
0
http://www.nytimages.com/wieck_preview_page_114677


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/27/walq27.xml

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040624-112921-3401r.htm

http://www.techcentralstation.com/092503F.html

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/033jgqyi.asp

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,314700,00.html

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-06-17-hadley_x.htm

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/special/iraq/1900897

http://www.techcentralstation.com/061804C.html

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/mylroie.html

http://dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/21/iraq/index.html?pn=1

http://www.techcentralstation.com/061804C.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,103163,00.html

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iraq/salman_pak.htm

http://www.archive-news.net/Articles/SH040923.html
 

Disagreeable

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
0
Cal said:
More polling data, more selectively pasted parts of an article, and more distortions. How typical.

:D Poor Cal. More whining and crying when the facts are presented and they don't add up the way you want them to. Yes, I cut out what I want to present, but I also put a link so you can read the entire article. You generally don't even bother to put a link; if you do it's to some site that's giving away the Kool Aide, not a respected news organization.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
some select passages from above:

"The indictment disclosed a close relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam's regime, which included specialists on chemical weapons and all types of bombs, including truck bombs, a favorite weapon of terrorists.
The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."



"Iraqi intelligence documents discovered in Baghdad by The Telegraph have provided the first evidence of a direct link between Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda terrorist"

and that was from 03, Dis maybe your being to selective in you reading and only finding data that supports you anti military, views....
 

Disagreeable

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
0
Steve said:
some select passages from above:

"The indictment disclosed a close relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam's regime, which included specialists on chemical weapons and all types of bombs, including truck bombs, a favorite weapon of terrorists.
The 1998 indictment said: "Al Qaeda also forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in the Sudan and with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States. In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the government of Iraq."



"Iraqi intelligence documents discovered in Baghdad by The Telegraph have provided the first evidence of a direct link between Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda terrorist"

and that was from 03, Dis maybe your being to selective in you reading and only finding data that supports you anti military, views....

Since you don't bother to post a link, I can and will only assume this is more hot air.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
Dissagreeable is there something wrong with you?

The link was posted in the prior posting that you were afaid to read, you can't face any truth that differs from you liberal agenda,,,how sad....yet you attempt to flood the site with the same tired old opinions....over and over again....and the call others lier or full of hot air...
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
Reader 2,

I don't disagree with you about who is worse or if we should support the Military dictatorship of the Pakastani goverment, I am not for the policy of supporting any goverment that supports terrorists,

but on how to handle each one takes a differant approach, Pakastan and Saudi Arabia seem to me to be two contradictions in policy if I take out thier stratigic importance in the overall fighting of terrorists. But looking at the larger progress available by not attaking these two countries it is easy to see why we are "just putting pressure on them"...to root out the causes of Islamic terrorism....

My posting the above excert from the above link were an effort to "show" disagreeables inability to grasp the proof offered that thier was credible links between Iraq and Al Qa"eda. but as ussual when presented with a disagreeing view or fact she refused to acknowledge the post and called the poster "myself" full of hot air , her new term that replaced the "lier" she has used so often in past posts.
 

Latest posts

Top