• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Poor Mikey!!!

TSR

Well-known member
passin thru said:
How soon the libs forget what actually happened in Fla.
Remember after the vote where the dems lost they started wanting recounts and kept losing in the recounts.
But if you remeber the libs only wanted a recount in Dem districts. Remember they didn't want the Rep districts recounted, or the MILITARY. How disgusting to try and portray yourself as for the Military and then don't want their vote to count.
To end it the Libs wanted to count the dem districts and the SC said that if they wanted to recount.............they had to recount ALL the districts.

Well thats not hardly how I remember it. Near the end of the fiasco, the recounting of all the votes in Fla had actually started brought about by a lower court's ruling but the Republicans stopped it by going to a Federal court. I'm not saying anything thing would have changed but thats the way I recall what happened.
 

TSR

Well-known member
Mike said:
What's low is the idea of a "Superdelegate" idea that the Democrats have adopted to allow the rich and powerful a chance to select the nominee!

"Superdelegate" is an informal term for some of the delegates to the Democratic National Convention, the quadrennial convention of the United States Democratic Party.

The convention delegates who are not superdelegates are selected as a result of party primaries and caucuses in each U.S. state, in which voters express their preference among the contenders for the party’s nomination for President of the United States. Delegates supporting each candidate are chosen in approximate ratio to their candidate’s share of the vote. In some states, the delegates so chosen are legally required to vote for the candidate to whom they are pledged, at least on the first ballot at the convention. By contrast, the superdelegates are seated based solely on their status as current or former elected officeholders and party officials. They are free to support any candidate for the nomination, although many of them have publicly announced endorsements."

IMO this superdelegate idea is about as bad as a "winner take all" process the Republicans use
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
kolanuraven said:
Oldtimer said:
Is this some new gene thats being bred in this new breed Republican :???: :wink: :p


Now...OT....you mean Rep's actually have ' sex'?

Well, if they do I bet the frown the whole 2 mintues! :wink:

You need to get your hands on last months Playboy (the Hooter girls edition :D )...They published a Repub/Dem divided sex survey-- and it looks like some of those midwest Red state gals live 2 faced lives- as they came out the wildest of the bunch..... :wink:

Are you two subscribers?
 

passin thru

Well-known member
Well thats not hardly how I remember it. Near the end of the fiasco, the recounting of all the votes in Fla had actually started brought about by a lower court's ruling but the Republicans stopped it by going to a Federal court. I'm not saying anything thing would have changed but thats the way I recall what happened.
They were recounting, but only the dem districts and the reps said count them all. Upheld by the SC.



Just the fact Kolouraven wants more of Bill in the whitehouse demostrates her charactor.
Another thing that demonstrates character is not condemning the dems for trying to silence the Military vote. But that is what I expected
 

Latest posts

Top