Interesting? Yes. Surprising? Not at all!!!
I've wondered for some time why we don't demand that the churches and individuals who promote and even demand such 'humanitarian' relocation of refugees step up and take them into their own churches, homes and businesses. That seems the least they could do, doesn't it?
I believe some churches are taking them into some communities, but how many are being paid for doing so? And how many actually are personally involved, as in using their own homes and families to welcome people so needy of refuge and support???
Further, I believe we should be told, as in public information, the names of churches and others who are doing this work, and how much they are being paid.
I have read, possibly on this site, but didn't make note of it, of church camps in TX which no longer are serving their own parishioners and the indigent city children they were formed to serve, and caring for refugees coming into the USA through Mexico. They are paid very well for the 'service' they provide, according to those stories I've seen within the past year or two.
It is one thing to do such 'good works' with the 'good hearts, and money from their parishioners, and an entirely different thing to be getting paid and making a profit for literally 'raising these new liberal voters' for the government. This was during the Obama administration, btw.
mrj
PS, the message on the video would be more impressive w/o the crude language, accurately descriptive tho it may be!
mrj