• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Preemptive Anarchy

hypocritexposer

Well-known member

Preemptive Anarchy

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton




Using the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, Marxists of the world are uniting to blaze a bloody trail across the globe in order to form an iron-fisted new world order. All in the disingenuous name of protecting the world's populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Which by the way, are subject to a very fluid and subjective interpretation.

Let's be blunt. Gadhafi is a monster and a murderous dictator. He should have been removed and brought to justice 25 years ago for murdering Americans and our troops. But we are not the world's policemen and Libya currently poses no threat to the US. Obama bypassed Congress and the Constitution and went straight to George Soros, Cass Sunstein, Samantha Powers and the UN. This should be an impeachable offense.

The Middle East is on fire in a whole list of countries, but the only one we intervene in is Libya. Why? Well, I believe that Libya is at least on the face of the matter, a test case for R2P. If the UN and world powers are successful in getting away with going in with military might to determine who rules that country in the name of security and protection, what is to stop them from going into any country they please for virtually any reason they can manufacture? Who will stop them? Next on the docket for R2P: Israel and the US.


Using the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, Marxists of the world are uniting to blaze a bloody trail across the globe in order to form an iron-fisted new world order. All in the disingenuous name of protecting the world's populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Which by the way, are subject to a very fluid and subjective interpretation.

Let's be blunt. Gadhafi is a monster and a murderous dictator. He should have been removed and brought to justice 25 years ago for murdering Americans and our troops. But we are not the world's policemen and Libya currently poses no threat to the US. Obama bypassed Congress and the Constitution and went straight to George Soros, Cass Sunstein, Samantha Powers and the UN. This should be an impeachable offense.

The Middle East is on fire in a whole list of countries, but the only one we intervene in is Libya. Why? Well, I believe that Libya is at least on the face of the matter, a test case for R2P. If the UN and world powers are successful in getting away with going in with military might to determine who rules that country in the name of security and protection, what is to stop them from going into any country they please for virtually any reason they can manufacture? Who will stop them? Next on the docket for R2P: Israel and the US.


R2P however INTENDS to police the world:

The mission of the R2P Coalition is:

* To convince the American people and its leaders to embrace the norm of the responsibility to protect as a domestic and foreign policy priority.
* To convince our political leadership that the US must join the ICC.
* To convince our political leadership to empower the UN and the ICC with a legitimate and effective deterrent and enforcement mechanism - an International Marshals Service - a standing international police force to arrest atrocity crimes indictees.

If the United Nations does not approve of a certain government’s behavior, and that government’s leaders will not respond to sanctions and the threat of prosecution, they will be attacked militarily.

Do you really believe the protests in the Middle East were spontaneous? That is laughable. It was prearranged, choreographed preemptive anarchy on a global scale to give justification to the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine. And so far, what Obama, Soros, Powers, Sunstein, world leaders and the UN have put in place while the rest of us were watching elsewhere, seems to be going off without a hitch. All the while, useful idiots in the media continue to miss the point in ways that either indicate complete incompetence or being absolutely on board with this one world diktat.

Trevor Loudon of New Zeal has written a piece that every American needs to read and now: “Responsibility to Protect” – The End of National Sovereignty As We Know It? It is the first of a series that he will be writing on the subject and his research is superb. One wonders why it takes a Kiwi to do the research work that most Americans seem unwilling to do. The only other I have seen that has the spine to confront this is Glenn Beck. As usual, Mr. Beck does an in-depth, factual and professional job of exposing the facts behind this whole mess. The rest of the media seem to all be on the side of Marxists, radicals and one world enthusiasts, assuming they don't also suffer from the most widespread affliction of selective blindness ever.

Remember, the ultimate goal is not itself anarchy. Anarchy is merely the vehicle. You can't convert the several sovereign nations of the world to a single monolithic governing entity without first engendering instability to create the necessary power vacuum, so that the self-appointed world rulers can step forward and save them. As is of course, their "responsibility."

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
The United Nations reported in July 2009;

The Obama administration is supporting moves to implement a U.N. doctrine calling for collective military action to halt genocide. In a week-long debate on implementing the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine, the U.S. joined a majority of U.N. countries, including Russia and China, in supporting implementation of the policy. The doctrine itself was approved in 2005 by more than 150 states including the U.S.

The doctrine specifies that diplomatic options such as internal conflict resolution, sanctions and prosecution by the International Criminal Court, should be used first. If they don’t work, then a multi-national force approved by the Security Council would be deployed.



According to the Responsibility to Protect website:

The doctrine of the responsibility to protect was first elaborated in 2001 by a group of prominent international human rights leaders comprising the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Under their mandate, the Commission sought to undertake the two-fold challenge of reconciling the international community’s responsibility to address massive violations of humanitarian norms and ensuring respect for the sovereign rights of nation states.

Led by Gareth Evans, former Foreign Minister of Australia, and Mohamed Sahnoun, Special Advisor to the UN Secretary-General, the Commission issued its report in December 2001. Focusing on the “right of humanitarian intervention,” this report examined when, if ever, it is appropriate for states to take coercive – and in particular military – action, against another state for the purpose of protecting populations at risk. In essence, the group concluded that when a group (or groups) of people is suffering from egregious acts of violence resulting from internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state where these crimes are taking place is unable or unwilling to act to prevent or protect its peoples, the international community has a moral duty to intervene to avert or halt these atrocities from occurring.

Gareth Evans, an Australian Fabian Socialist and Mohamed Sahnoun both worked with leftist financier George Soros in the highly influential International Crisis Group.


Cooper writes on the Responsibility to Protect website:

Yet as I write, a quiet revolution is under way. In September 2005, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a declaration – the World Summit Outcome – whereby each and every State in the world accepted its responsibility to protect populations from genocide, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing and war crimes. The declaration also emphasizes that if a State relinquishes its responsibility to protect – whether by will or lack of capacity – this responsibility must be borne by the international community that can decide to intervene as a last resort. In the face of mass atrocities, every nation and thus every people on earth have pledged to be our brothers’ keepers. Without fanfare and with little notice, the obsolete principles underlying the Westphalian ordering of world affairs have been dramatically rewritten. We can no longer hide behind State sovereignty, a 400-years old shield, to excuse the shameful reflex and ongoing practice of remaining passive in the face of the most outrageous behaviors…


“Responsibility to Protect” means the end of national sovereignty. It mandates the surrender of any nation state’s legal authority over their own citizenry and armed forces to a supra-national body, with the power to sanction or destroy any deemed “rogue” nation – does Israel spring to mind?

http://gulagbound.com/14275/responsibility-to-protect-%E2%80%93-the-end-of-national-sovereignty-as-we-know-it
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Silver said:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

you won't be laughing in a couple more years.



U.N. envoy Richard Falk accuses Israel of ‘ethnic cleansing’
March 22, 2011

Academic and U.N. investigator Richard Falk has outdone himself in his unrelenting quest to demonize Israel. Israeli envoy Aharon Leshno Yaar called Falk an “embarrassment to the UN” in response to Falk’s claim that Israeli settlement building amounts to “ethnic cleansing”:

Falk, who is also an investigator for the UN, said earlier in the day that Israel’s expansion of settlements in East Jerusalem and eviction of Palestinians from their homes is a form of ethnic cleansing.

Speaking to Haaretz, Leshno Yaar said Falk is the man who “claims that it is unclear who stands behind the terror attacks of 9/11 and calls IDF soldiers Nazis.”

Falk has been admonished in the past by UN Secretary General Ben Ki-moon for comments that he made about the 9/11 terror attacks.

“Israel doesn’t participate with Falk,” Leshno Yaar said, adding that he leaves the room when he speaks.

Falk made the comments while speaking to the UN Human Rights Council as it prepared to pass resolutions condemning settlement building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

http://blog.standforisrael.org/articles/u-n-envoy-richard-falk-accuses-israel-of-ethnic-cleansing



UNHRC to vote on six anti-Israel resolutions

By TOVAH LAZAROFF
03/24/2011 01:55

UN Human Rights Council focuses on Jewish State with multiple resolutions speaking of illegal Israeli activity and rights violations.

The United Nations Human Rights Council is set to vote on six resolutions on Israel, but only one that focuses on Iran and none on Libya, as it wraps up its 16th session Thursday and Friday.

One of the resolutions asks that the Security Council consider referring the situation in the “occupied Palestinian territories” to theInternational Criminal Court.

Votes on the resolutions come in the same week that Palestinians in Gaza launched a barrage of rockets against southern Israel and a woman was killed and 39 other people were wounded by a bomb at the Jerusalem Central Bus Station.

Within the resolution on the Goldstone Report on Gaza is a call by the UNHRC for the General Assembly to reconsider that report, which strongly attacks Israeli for grave human rights violations and possible war crimes, during its 2011 session.

It asks that the General Assembly refer the Goldstone Report to the Security Council for further action.

It further asks that the Security Council consider referring the situation in the “occupied Palestinian territories” to the International Criminal Court.

According to nongovernmental group UN Watch, which monitors the Human Rights Council’s activity, prior to its 16th session the council had approved 51 resolutions dealing with individual countries, out of which 35 were about Israel.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=213542
 

Silver

Well-known member
You just keep cutting and pasting there Buddy! There are likely some really good sites out there with good information on the moon and how it's made of blue cheese too.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Silver said:
You just keep cutting and pasting there Buddy! There are likely some really good sites out there with good information on the moon and how it's made of blue cheese too.

I'm not worried about the moon, but I am worried about Western civilizations being manipulated by the Muslims into helping them towards their stated goals.

It's nice being all Politically correct and all that, but it's all going to lead to more bloodshed in the future, if not a war the size of the last WW.

We are within a couple to a few years of it happening.
 

Silver

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Silver said:
You just keep cutting and pasting there Buddy! There are likely some really good sites out there with good information on the moon and how it's made of blue cheese too.

I'm not worried about the moon, but I am worried about Western civilizations being manipulated by the Muslims into helping them towards their stated goals.

It's nice being all Politically correct and all that, but it's all going to lead to more bloodshed in the future, if not a war the size of the last WW.

We are within a couple to a few years of it happening.

You sound convinced.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Larrry said:
Some people just love being told "we told you so" it will happen again

Anybody that does not see that this is about obama, and the left, advancing their ideology, which includes the diminishing of US sovereignty is not watching what is going on.

Libya is not about saving civilian lives, or the obama administration would be pushing for UN resolutions in other Countries like Sudan etc.
 

Silver

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Larrry said:
Some people just love being told "we told you so" it will happen again

Anybody that does not see that this is about obama, and the left, advancing their ideology, which includes the diminishing of US sovereignty is not watching what is going on.

Libya is not about saving civilian lives, or the obama administration would be pushing for UN resolutions in other Countries like Sudan etc.

I don't completely disagree with you. Funny thing is, I said exactly the same thing about Gulf war one AND two. And got shouted down. Go figure.
 
Top