I'm going to post those who voted for SB122 and those who voted against private property rights in the SD House of Representatives again for any of you who may have missed it. If any of you have any of the legislators who voted against this in your district, I hope you make them realize what a dumb thing they just did.
SB 122: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to restrict the entry of conservation officers onto certain private land without permission.
Was read the second time.
Rep. Dykstra moved the previous question.
Which motion prevailed.
The question being "Shall SB 122 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 27, Nays 43, Excused 0, Absent 0
Yeas:
Bradford; Brunner; Davis; Deadrick; Dennert; Garnos; Gassman; Glover; Hackl; Halverson; Hanks; Hargens; Haverly; Hills; Howie; Jensen; Klaudt; Lange; Nelson; Pederson (Gordon); Putnam; Rave; Rhoden; Sigdestad; Turbiville; Valandra; Van Norman
Nays:
Boomgarden; Buckingham; Cutler; Dykstra; Elliott; Faehn; Frost; Fryslie; Gillespie; Glenski; Haley; Heineman; Hennies; Hunhoff; Hunt; Jerke; Koistinen; Kraus; Krebs; Kroger; McCoy; McLaughlin; Miles; Murschel; Novstrup; O'Brien; Olson (Ryan); Peters; Rausch; Roberts; Rounds; Schafer; Sebert; Street; Thompson; Tidemann; Tornow; Van Etten; Vehle; Weems; Wick; Willadsen; Speaker Michels
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the Speaker declared the bill lost.