• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

professor Stephen Jones paper on nano thermate in WTC towers

A

Anonymous

Guest
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609/WhyIndeedDidtheWorldTradeCenterBuildingsCompletelyCollapse.pdf

Proof that the Military was involved in supplying the thermate that brought down the wtc towers. what you say about that Steve? lol
 

Steve

Well-known member
Steven Earl Jones is an American physicist, who was relieved of his teaching duties.
for those who would like to read a comprehensive review of Jones "gibberish"
http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
do you ever get the feeling, when you respond to your own posts that people are ignoring you?

Like I've told you many times. People on Ranchers are welll aware of the "conspiracy theories"


But thanks for your late input. You are only late by about 9 years.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Not so fast Hypo.. I think Shamy pooie is on to something with Professor Jones...

check out this Jones "Paper"
http://space.crono911.net/EBook/805_Jones_Jesus.pdf
Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ's Visit in Ancient America
By Steven E. Jones

when a professor can go into a field he has no training in and write one important paper, why couldn't he go into another filed and write another paper as well in a field he has even less knowledge in?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

the fact that the anthrax came from the military is admitted and now the military grade nano thermate is a problem for you isn't it?
 

Larrry

Well-known member
[img said:
http://i956.photobucket.com/albums/ae48/Whitewing_album/3k43m63lc5V45O15T2a92397b04b9fc11158e-11.jpg[/img]"]
tinfoil_hat.jpg
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

the fact that the anthrax came from the military is admitted and now the military grade nano thermate is a problem for you isn't it?

I'm sure with a different approach, you might have had a few that might have been willing to debate and look at the evidence. You screwed the pooch on this website buddy.

You should really read some of Nap Hill's work.


It will be the liberals that agree with you, in your quest to demonize the"right"

They tend to agee with everything you say is true.

I haven't seen any of them disagree with you yet. So at least you have OT, Bullhauller, Jingo2 and the rest of the liberals on board.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

the fact that the anthrax came from the military is admitted and now the military grade nano thermate is a problem for you isn't it?

I'm sure with a different approach, you might have had a few that might have been willing to debate and look at the evidence. You screwed the pooch on this website buddy.

You should really read some of Nap Hill's work.

i really do not care...i know some are going to look into what i am exposing here and they will see I am not just blowing smoke...most of the people on this site are not courageous enough to handle the truth. but, i am sure some are...i have found that young people are more open to the truth...they just have not been brainwashed enough yet.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

the fact that the anthrax came from the military is admitted and now the military grade nano thermate is a problem for you isn't it?

I'm sure with a different approach, you might have had a few that might have been willing to debate and look at the evidence. You screwed the pooch on this website buddy.

You should really read some of Nap Hill's work.

i really do not care...i know some are going to look into what i am exposing here and they will see I am not just blowing smoke...most of the people on this site are not courageous enough to handle the truth. but, i am sure some are...i have found that young people are more open to the truth...they just have not been brainwashed enough yet.

Can you explain the logic behind posting the same thing day after day and expecting a differnet result?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
hypocritexposer said:
I'm sure with a different approach, you might have had a few that might have been willing to debate and look at the evidence. You screwed the pooch on this website buddy.

You should really read some of Nap Hill's work.

i really do not care...i know some are going to look into what i am exposing here and they will see I am not just blowing smoke...most of the people on this site are not courageous enough to handle the truth. but, i am sure some are...i have found that young people are more open to the truth...they just have not been brainwashed enough yet.

Can you explain the logic behind posting the same thing day after day and expecting a differnet result?

i was going to ask you the same thing...
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
i really do not care...i know some are going to look into what i am exposing here and they will see I am not just blowing smoke...most of the people on this site are not courageous enough to handle the truth. but, i am sure some are...i have found that young people are more open to the truth...they just have not been brainwashed enough yet.

Can you explain the logic behind posting the same thing day after day and expecting a differnet result?

i was going to ask you the same thing...

You might have something there, if you can prove that you post on more subjects per day than I do.


You're a one trick pony, that the liberals on this site agree with. I've been around long enough to recognize a liberal instigator to know one.



Most of your conspiracy theories are liberal. You are a liberal. You make all liberals look bad. You enmbarass the ones on Ranchers that choose not to speak up.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
shaumei said:
hypocritexposer said:
Can you explain the logic behind posting the same thing day after day and expecting a differnet result?

i was going to ask you the same thing...

You might have something there, if you can prove that you post on more subjects per day than I do.


You're a one trick pony, that the liberals on this site agree with. I've been around long enough to recognize a liberal instigator to know one.



Most of your conspiracy theories are liberal. You are a liberal. You make all liberals look bad. You enmbarass the ones on Ranchers that choose not to speak up.

once again you show what a moron idiot you are. I have revealed that mcveigh worked for the us govt when he assisted with the bombing in okc. this was during a democrat presidents reign.

i have revealed that obama is an illegal alien and is a product of mass media and the cia.

i have revealed that clinton assisted importing drugs into mena arkansas.

on and on...your problem is you are just too small minded on what to do with me as you must categorize me between two categories...one conservative and one liberal...these are the only two teams that can exist in your small mind.

how about patriots. i stand for america and the constitution....
 

Steve

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

had you read my post... and was able to comprehend english you would have noticed this link.

the link that "shows factually" how and why Jones is wrong...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve said:
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

had you read my post... and was able to comprehend english you would have noticed this link.

the link that "shows factually" how and why Jones is wrong...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

i do not need to read some more lies. anyone with half a brain that has analyzed the video footage along with the evidence presented by Jones and 1200 plus architects and engineers knows that the wtc buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions...

you cannot have freefall speed without removing all points of resistance....you cannot remove all points of resistance at one moment in time with isolated office fires...it is done only thru timed demolitions....only...

never in history has this happened before to a steel building and never since...it was controlled demolitons and the thermate came from the military. same place where the anthrax came from....
 

hopalong

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve said:
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

had you read my post... and was able to comprehend english you would have noticed this link.

the link that "shows factually" how and why Jones is wrong...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

i. anyone with half a brain

That fits you to a "t" except i would put yours at maybe 3 tenths
go take your meds you'll feel better
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Steve said:
shaumei said:
Steve,

no comment about the paper? just about jones...thats right, kill the messenger when you can do nothing about the message.

had you read my post... and was able to comprehend english you would have noticed this link.

the link that "shows factually" how and why Jones is wrong...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

i do not need to read some more lies.

Translation: My mind is made up and I'm doing exactly what I accuse others of doing.......that being closed-minded.

Which is why I ask you constantly Shamu if video of the 'cavemen' getting on board the planes would really satisfy you, if video of the AA jetliner crashing into the Pentagon would really satisfy you, etc.

I suspect not.

You've got your mind made up on this subject. I've read all your sites, read the stories about Mena, Arkansas (probably long before the voices appeared in your head) and have reached a different conclusion than you have reached on these subjects.

What happened on 9-11 was the result of a fat and lazy government not paying attention to storm clouds building.....not an 8 month old administration planning and executing the biggest mass murder of Americans in our history.

I'm sorry Shamu, you're drilling a couple of stands off bottom if you know what I mean.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
shaumei said:
Steve said:
had you read my post... and was able to comprehend english you would have noticed this link.

the link that "shows factually" how and why Jones is wrong...

http://www.debunking911.com/jones.htm

i do not need to read some more lies.

Translation: My mind is made up and I'm doing exactly what I accuse others of doing.......that being closed-minded.

Which is why I ask you constantly Shamu if video of the 'cavemen' getting on board the planes would really satisfy you, if video of the AA jetliner crashing into the Pentagon would really satisfy you, etc.

I suspect not.

You've got your mind made up on this subject. I've read all your sites, read the stories about Mena, Arkansas (probably long before the voices appeared in your head) and have reached a different conclusion than you have reached on these subjects.

What happened on 9-11 was the result of a fat and lazy government not paying attention to storm clouds building.....not an 8 month old administration planning and executing the biggest mass murder of Americans in our history.

I'm sorry Shamu, you're drilling a couple of stands off bottom if you know what I mean.

what did PNAC say they wanted to do?

your opinion on what an 8 month old administration could or would do means nothing when the evidence against what they did do is stacked against them...

bush nor cheney have gone under oath..they need to..
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
your opinions are not fact based...they are your opinions...I posted a paper here that has been peer reviewed and you have nothing to say about it other than attack jones personally....

i have posted info time and again with you just attacking the messengers, not the message...
 
Top