• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Public Service Announcement!

Mike

Well-known member
Janet Riley - Public Relations Director - AMI:

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."
 

Econ101

Well-known member
Packer employee pay has steadily decreased over the last 15 years in real terms. Perhaps if the packers paid the mothers more they might be able to afford their product!!! Why should producers always have to foot the bill?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Hasn't R-CULT stood on the same stage as those who would take beef off the school lunch menu?

Then again, when you take a position that having bse in your native herd means your beef is contaminated and high risk you can't be too bright to begin with.

This was a stupid statement by AMI!

OLD NEWS MIKE!


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Hasn't R-CULT stood on the same stage as those who would take beef off the school lunch menu?

Then again, when you take a position that having bse in your native herd means your beef is contaminated and high risk you can't be too bright to begin with.

This was a stupid statement by AMI!

OLD NEWS MIKE!


~SH~

So, SH, if the beef that is currently being recalled by Tyson was in the school lunch program, would you advocate its removal or would you have it be fed to the kids?

Don't think that just because this is a question about grade school that your "lying king' title is appropriate.

The contamination of the Tyson ground meat was discovered during routine testing by the USDA, the agency said. The meat was produced Feb. 16.



Calls to representatives at the Wallula plant and Tyson's corporate headquarters in Arkansas were not returned Saturday.



Eating food contaminated with E. coli 0157:H7 can lead to serious illness or even death, according to the USDA. Seniors, young children and people with compromised immune systems are the most susceptible to foodborne illnesses.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Lying King: "So, SH, if the beef that is currently being recalled by Tyson was in the school lunch program, would you advocate its removal or would you have it be fed to the kids?"

ahh....gee....I think they should poison the children for corporate financial gains.

WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU IDIOT?

This isn't about removing TAINTED BEEF from the school lunch program, this is about removing ALL BEEF! Nice spin job!

Don't respond to my posts Conman if you are going to insist on acting like such a complete idiot.


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Lying King: "So, SH, if the beef that is currently being recalled by Tyson was in the school lunch program, would you advocate its removal or would you have it be fed to the kids?"

ahh....gee....I think they should poison the children for corporate financial gains.

WHAT DO YOU THINK YOU IDIOT?

This isn't about removing TAINTED BEEF from the school lunch program, this is about removing ALL BEEF! Nice spin job!

Don't respond to my posts Conman if you are going to insist on acting like such a complete idiot.


~SH~


How much of the recall did they get back AND can you guarantee that none of it that was not returned was fed to children?

What was the reason for taking beef off the menu?

And yes, I do think you are an idiot.
 

PORKER

Well-known member
Organic Trade Association, www.ota.com

1. Organic products meet stringent standards - Organic certification is the public’s assurance that products have been grown and handled according to strict procedures without persistent toxic chemical inputs.

2. Organic food tastes great! - It’s common sense – well-balanced soils produce strong, healthy plants that become nourishing food for people and animals.

3. Organic production reduces health risks - Many EPA-approved pesticides were registered long before extensive research linked these chemicals to cancer and other diseases. Organic agriculture is one way to prevent any more of these chemicals from getting into the air, earth and water that sustain us.

4. Organic farms respect our water resources - The elimination of polluting chemicals and nitrogen leaching, done in combination with soil building, protects and conserves water resources.

5. Organic farmers build healthy soil - Soil is the foundation of the food chain. The primary focus of organic farming is to use practices that build healthy soils.

6. Organic farmers work in harmony with nature - Organic agriculture respects the balance demanded of a healthy ecosystem: wildlife is encouraged by including forage crops in rotation and by retaining fence rows, wetlands, and other natural areas.

7. Organic producers are leaders in innovative research - Organic farmers have led the way, largely at their own expense, with innovative on-farm research aimed at reducing pesticide use and minimizing agriculture’s impact on the environment.

8. Organic producers strive to preserve diversity - The loss of a large variety of species (biodiversity) is one of the most pressing environmental concerns. The good news is that many organic farmers and gardeners have been collecting and preserving seeds, and growing unusual varieties for decades.

9. Organic farming helps keep rural communities healthy - USDA reported that in 1997, half of U.S. farm production came from only 2% of farms. Organic agriculture can be a lifeline for small farms because it offers an alternative market where sellers can command fair prices for crops.

10. Organic abundance – Foods and non-foods alike! - Now every food or meat category has an organic alternative. And non-food agricultural products are being grown organically – even cotton, which most experts felt could not be grown this way.
 

Beefman

Well-known member
Mike said:
Janet Riley - Public Relations Director - AMI:

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."

Mike, can you remind us all where Janet Riley said this?
 

Mike

Well-known member
Beefman said:
Mike said:
Janet Riley - Public Relations Director - AMI:

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."

Mike, can you remind us all where Janet Riley said this?

If I remember correctly it was St. Paul?

Why?
Are you focusing on your growing bank account, or on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Lying King: "How much of the recall did they get back AND can you guarantee that none of it that was not returned was fed to children?

What was the reason for taking beef off the menu?

And yes, I do think you are an idiot."

Why did R-CULT align themselves with a group that wanted to REMOVE ALL BEEF from the school lunch program???

HUH LYING KING????

No question you are a complete idiot! Biggest liar that ever graced this forum with your disgusting presence.


~SH~
 

PORKER

Well-known member
The project will include sampling and surveying existing CAFOs across Nebraska for hormones in feedlot handling processes; how stockpiling, composting and containing runoff determines the presence of hormones in feedlots; and what manure application strategies best contain hormone losses from a feedlot through water runoff and soil erosion.

"Going in, we expect that the research will show measurable levels of hormones occur in cattle manure, and that these compounds or their derivatives can remain in soil for extended periods of time and may be found in runoff water from land receiving applications of cattle manure," Snow says.

Hormones are commonly used to help stimulate livestock growth, but a growing body of scientific evidence indicates their presence in the environment can alter the development of wildlife species and have other endocrine-disrupting health effects. Naturally produced hormones excreted by livestock also may contribute to these effects, Snow said.

"Project results will serve as a research base for future studies that will enable scientific and regulatory communities to better understand how animal waste management practices influence the outcome of hormones that are introduced into the environment from animal manures," Snow says.

"The project will make full use of state of the art instrumentation available at the UNL Water Sciences Laboratory and new methods of measuring very low levels of these contaminants in a variety of samples," Snow says.

Cattle hormone's can't be good for childern either.No wonder the Europeans refuse beef with hormones.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
SH, "Why did R-CULT align themselves with a group that wanted to REMOVE ALL BEEF from the school lunch program??? "

Why has George Bush aligned himself with Ted Kennedy?
 

Beefman

Well-known member
Mike said:
Beefman said:
Mike said:
Janet Riley - Public Relations Director - AMI:

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."

Mike, can you remind us all where Janet Riley said this?

If I remember correctly it was St. Paul?

Why?
Are you focusing on your growing bank account, or on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef?

I'm attempting to locate confirmation on when and where she said this. Do you have any links?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
SH, "Why did R-CULT align themselves with a group that wanted to REMOVE ALL BEEF from the school lunch program??? "

Why has George Bush aligned himself with Ted Kennedy?

Or GHW Bush with Bill Clinton?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandcheska: "You NCBA folk sure are sensitive about anything that puts the packers in a bad light......"

No, we're just sensitive about your relentless lies and misinformation.


~SH~
 
Top