Elementary,
Let's get past one issue shall we?
You claim that the difference between this week's cash cattle that will be killed this week and this week's formula cattle that will be killed this week is proof of market manipulation. That was your claim.
I suppose now you are going to deny saying that huh?
Don't make me go back and get your quotes so you can slither out of it. Be a man and stand by your position.
Do you understand that this week's cash cattle market is based on this week's supply and demand factors and that this week's "NON NEGOTIATED" formula cattle are based on the weekly weighted average of last week's cash price?
Do you understand that?
If so, how can you claim market manipulation due to a difference between the cash price and the formula price when they are based on seperate weeks?
If supply and demand factors do not change from week to week, then why do prices change?
I think you know you cannot defend your position so you resort to diversion to avoid being pegged.
On the other hand, I admit when I am wrong knowing that desperate little parasites like Sandman will have a feeding frenzy with it.
Either back your position or admit that you can't. Be a man and quit slithering for once.
Observe folks...............
Any bets on whether Elementary Economics will try to explain his position, whether he will run off on an unrelated topic to divert, or whether he will admit that he's wrong.
Anyone placing any bets?
I'm betting he won't touch trying to explain how the formula and cash price from seperate weeks should be the same. He doesn't want to know the truth, he wants to find what he can find to support his anti corporate packer blaming bias.
~SH~