Oldtimer please explain something to me. Obama claimed his executive order, that you are defending :roll: , is to stop the deportation of illegal immigrants that were brought into the country be their parents before the age of 16, have lived in the US for the last five years and have attended school in the US or served in the Military, as long as these kids which includes 30 year olds are LAW ABIDING.
Here are my questions for you
1. If they are ILLEGALLY in the country should they really be considered LAW ABIDING? HINT: Law abiding people would leave the country and re-enter by following the due process set up to be considered LEGAL.
2. If they are in the military how did they get there if they have to be a citizen to join the military? And didn't Bush sign a bill that gave immigrants that joined the military the right to citizenship after they were sworn in?
3. The Democrats keep saying illegals can't be deported as it would break up too many families. So by giving the KIDS the right to stay in the US does that not mean that their parents the brought them here ILLEGALLY are also being given the right to stay in the US as not to break up the Democrat precious family unit?
4. Obama claimed his actions only affected 800,000 KIDS that were ILLEGALLY in the US by no fault of their own but how many parents to those kids will also be allowed to stay and take jobs from US CITIZENS?
5, When you look at the results his executive order is going have on those AMERICAN CITIZENS looking for work in a down economy are his actions really the "RIGHT THING TO DO" for the US or are they
" THE RIGHT THING TO DO" for his election results?
6. AGAIN what has changed in the last year, other that Obama's re-election chances that gives him the authority to side step a Congressional vote denying this very action?
NO blaming Bush, No claiming well everyone does it, and no filthy name calling because you were told not to make your usual lame excuses. Just answer my questions IF YOU CAN.
Here are my questions for you
1. If they are ILLEGALLY in the country should they really be considered LAW ABIDING? HINT: Law abiding people would leave the country and re-enter by following the due process set up to be considered LEGAL.
2. If they are in the military how did they get there if they have to be a citizen to join the military? And didn't Bush sign a bill that gave immigrants that joined the military the right to citizenship after they were sworn in?
3. The Democrats keep saying illegals can't be deported as it would break up too many families. So by giving the KIDS the right to stay in the US does that not mean that their parents the brought them here ILLEGALLY are also being given the right to stay in the US as not to break up the Democrat precious family unit?
4. Obama claimed his actions only affected 800,000 KIDS that were ILLEGALLY in the US by no fault of their own but how many parents to those kids will also be allowed to stay and take jobs from US CITIZENS?
5, When you look at the results his executive order is going have on those AMERICAN CITIZENS looking for work in a down economy are his actions really the "RIGHT THING TO DO" for the US or are they
" THE RIGHT THING TO DO" for his election results?
6. AGAIN what has changed in the last year, other that Obama's re-election chances that gives him the authority to side step a Congressional vote denying this very action?
NO blaming Bush, No claiming well everyone does it, and no filthy name calling because you were told not to make your usual lame excuses. Just answer my questions IF YOU CAN.