It is my understanding that they have tried these same transusion tests on actual bovines and have not been able to obtain the same results.
I will put my faith in the collection of world scientists that have agreed that SRM removal, increased BSE surveilance in the highest risk categories, and the feed ban is the correct approach.
Not some researcher who is looking for his "claim to fame" by being contradictory or some trade isolationist BSE "fear mongerer" that is trying to set a BSE presidence for Canada that they are unwilling to live with themselves.
Just look at the statistical aspects of this whole thing.
If BSE was the potential problem that some would lead us to believe, WHERE IS THE PROOF???
It doesn't exist!
It's all conjecture and theory!
If we let "conjecture" and "theory" start regulating us to death based on "what ifs", where will it end????
Sandhusker: "Because he ruled in R-CALF's favor does not mean R-CALF bought him off - it only means they had the better arguements."
Wrong again Sandhusker!
It means the judge thought R-CALF's arguments WERE WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION. Who has the better arguments has yet to be decided.
Typical you!
Sandhusker: "Yes, R-CALF member do see this as a fight for survival. However, the fight is NOT against the Canadian producers, as many Canadians have willed themselves to believe."
Lip service!
I suppose that would explain Leo McDonnell stating that Canada was still processing downer cows???
Yup, you keep ignoring the knife that your organization has stuck in the back of our northern neighbors because they are too ignorant to understand the true impact of Canadian imports on the WORLD MARKET.
Give that R-CULT turbin another wrap!
~SH~