• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

R-calf BS-E Newsletter

Manitoba_Rancher

Well-known member
R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America


For Immediate Release Contact: Shae Dodson, Communications Coordinator
July 6, 2006 Phone: 406-672-8969; e-mail: [email protected]



Latest BSE Case Shows Canadian BSE Problem Worse Than First Thought



Billings, Mont. – The Canadian government confirmed another positive case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) on July 4, 2006. Canada’s total reported BSE cases now number eight – one detected in a cow imported from Great Britain in 1993 and seven detected in native-born Canadian cattle.



It is clear that Canada’s BSE problem is making it more difficult for U.S. beef to get back into the markets of South Korea and Japan,” said R-CALF USA President Chuck Kiker. “We need to be able to differentiate high-quality U.S. beef from Canadian beef to gain full resumption of U.S. exports. I hope that President Bush will ask the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to make this important policy change. I also ask the President to urge Canadian Prime Minister Harper to increase BSE testing and take other mitigation measures to get this problem under control,” Kiker continued.



South Korea recently informed the U.S. that it was delaying the resumption of imports of U.S. beef because it was concerned that the U.S. was commingling Canadian beef with U.S. beef.



Kiker said that because USDA policies allow Canadian beef to be commingled with U.S. beef, and remain indistinguishable to consumers, the U.S. cattle industry is unnecessarily tying its reputation to the Canadian cattle herd. “USDA must take immediate action to protect the integrity and viability of the U.S. cattle industry.”



Kiker said R-CALF USA is calling on USDA to immediately implement the following reforms:



Postpone indefinitely the agency’s plans to further liberalize U.S. import restrictions by allowing Canadian cattle and beef over 30 months of age into the United States.
Immediately adopt and enforce the more stringent BSE import standards that are applied and practiced by all other BSE-affected countries, with the exception of the U.S. and Canada, and which continue to apply to U.S. beef and cattle exports. This would include a requirement that high-risk tissues be removed from Canadian cattle at 12 months of age and a restriction on the scope of imported products, such as only boneless beef from cattle less than 30 months of age.
Immediately reverse the USDA policy of granting access for imports to the U.S. market before the U.S. regains market access in foreign countries.
Immediately begin differentiating beef produced exclusively from U.S. cattle from beef produced from foreign cattle with a country-of-origin label.
Urge the Canadian government to increase BSE testing to the level necessary to determine the true prevalence of BSE in the Canadian cattle herd, including mandatory testing of all high risk cattle.


One of the seven Canadian-origin BSE cases was detected in the U.S. in December 2003, and the remaining six were detected in Canada from a test sample size of about 115,000 total cattle tested since the disease was first detected in Canada’s native cattle herd in May 2003. During the past 12 months, however, the true scope of Canada’s BSE problem has become more evident, with 3 positive cases detected within a test sample size of only about 55,346 cattle tested.



The latest detection confirms that the scope of Canada’s BSE problem is clearly worse than first thought. Canada’s ratio of positive BSE cases per 10,000 cattle tested under its enhanced testing program over the past 12 months is 0.54 cases per 10,000 cattle tested, which is higher than the 12-month ratios reported by many European Union (EU) countries for 2004.



In June 2005, the EU issued a detailed report on the monitoring and testing of cattle for BSE in 2004. (The report on 2005 testing has not yet been released.) In that report, the EU determined the ratio of the total positive cases per number of “risk” cattle tested in each of the Member-States of the European Union, including the United Kingdom.[1] A comparison of Canada’s BSE statistics with data compiled for each member of the EU reveals that Canada’s ratio of BSE positive cattle for the past 12 months of 0.54 is the same as or higher than the 2004 ratios of all but six of the 15 original countries of the EU, which, similar to Canada, all reported results of testing “risk” cattle including fallen stock, animals with clinical signs, and cattle subject to emergency slaughter. Canada’s 12-month ratio is now comparable to or higher than the 2004 ratios reported for Belgium, Denmark, Italy, and the Netherlands.



In addition, Canada’s BSE prevalence rate has increased. In 2005, based on four indigenous cases at the time, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) calculated Canada’s BSE prevalence rate at .145 cases per million head of adult cattle. With three new cases detected in 2006, Canada’s BSE prevalence rate, based on its adult herd size of approximately six million cattle, has risen to approximately 1.166 per million head of cattle.



“In response to data showing that Canada’s BSE-positive testing ratio is on par with many European Union countries that have detected relatively high numbers of BSE cases over the past several years, the USDA needs to act swiftly so any negative perception that major world beef importers may have regarding Canada’s BSE status does not continue to translate into further delays in reopening lost U.S. export markets,” said Kiker.

# # #



R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on domestic and international trade and marketing issues. R-CALF USA, a national, non-profit organization, is dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. R-CALF USA’s membership consists primarily of cow/calf operators, cattle backgrounders, and feedlot owners. Its members – over 18,000 strong – are located in 47 states, and the organization has over 60 local and state association affiliates, from both cattle and farm organizations. Various main street businesses are associate members of R-CALF USA. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com or, call 406-252-2516.



[1] See European Commission, Report on the Monitoring and Testing of Ruminants for the Presence of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) in the EU in 2004, June 13, 2005, at 25 (showing BSE positive ratios for tested cattle classified as fallen stock, cattle with clinical signs for BSE, and emergency slaughter cattle).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] See European Commission, Report on the Monitoring and Testing of Ruminants for the Presence of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) in the EU in 2004, June 13, 2005, at 25 (showing BSE positive ratios for tested cattle classified as fallen stock, cattle with clinical signs for BSE, and emergency slaughter cattle).




It is clear that Canada’s BSE problem is making it more difficult for U.S. beef to get back into the markets of South Korea and Japan,” said R-CALF USA President Chuck Kiker. “We need to be able to differentiate high-quality U.S. beef from Canadian beef to gain full resumption of U.S.

"Who may I ask is shipping beef to Japan and who is not" Keep going R-laugh boys your grave is getting deeper!!!!!!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Korea has said straight up that your beef mingling with ours is a problem to them. No hinting, no guessing. R-CALF predicted this a couple of years ago.
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
Manitoba_Rancher said:
Who may I ask is shipping beef to Japan and who is not" Keep going R-laugh boys your grave is getting deeper!!!!!!

Why not ship it all to Japan...we would both be better off! :wink: :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
RobertMac said:
Manitoba_Rancher said:
Who may I ask is shipping beef to Japan and who is not" Keep going R-laugh boys your grave is getting deeper!!!!!!

Why not ship it all to Japan...we would both be better off! :wink: :roll:

If we shipped all ours to Japan then where would you get the beef to ship to Korea? :?
If you start shipping yours to Korea without a supplement supply just think about what that will do to the supply/price of beef in the US. :shock:

We all know you don't have enough beef in the US to supply your own domestic market at a price the average housewife will pay. Remember the large increase in imports while you had nearly NO EXPORTS.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Tam said:
RobertMac said:
Manitoba_Rancher said:
Who may I ask is shipping beef to Japan and who is not" Keep going R-laugh boys your grave is getting deeper!!!!!!

Why not ship it all to Japan...we would both be better off! :wink: :roll:

If we shipped all ours to Japan then where would you get the beef to ship to Korea? :?
If you start shipping yours to Korea without a supplement supply just think about what that will do to the supply/price of beef in the US. :shock:

We all know you don't have enough beef in the US to supply your own domestic market at a price the average housewife will pay. Remember the large increase in imports while you had nearly NO EXPORTS.

Tam, You worry about yourself. We'll worry about us. :lol:
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
Tam said:
RobertMac said:
Manitoba_Rancher said:
Who may I ask is shipping beef to Japan and who is not" Keep going R-laugh boys your grave is getting deeper!!!!!!

Why not ship it all to Japan...we would both be better off! :wink: :roll:

If we shipped all ours to Japan then where would you get the beef to ship to Korea? :?
If you start shipping yours to Korea without a supplement supply just think about what that will do to the supply/price of beef in the US. :shock:

We all know you don't have enough beef in the US to supply your own domestic market at a price the average housewife will pay. Remember the large increase in imports while you had nearly NO EXPORTS.

Go ahead, Tam, I'm sure we can struggle to get by without Canadian beef. Remember supply/demand?????? Must not, eh???

Tight supplies mean high prices...I'm willing to see how much the above-average housewife will pay.

And why the sudden sympathy for the USA producer???????????????
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
According to the latest beef consumption studies, the majority of beef is purchased by those with lower incomes. This suggests to me that we aren't priced out of the market yet.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
According to the latest beef consumption studies, the majority of beef is purchased by those with lower incomes. This suggests to me that we aren't priced out of the market yet.

Janet Riley would argue with you Sandhusker,

Remember this little tidbit from her?

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Mike said:
Sandhusker said:
According to the latest beef consumption studies, the majority of beef is purchased by those with lower incomes. This suggests to me that we aren't priced out of the market yet.

Janet Riley would argue with you Sandhusker,

Remember this little tidbit from her?

"It's time for these producers to stop focusing on their growing bank accounts and start focusing on the mothers and children that are struggling to afford beef."

I think I do remember that comment. Come to think of it, hasn't the NCBA been joining with these people on various issues?
 

Latest posts

Top