• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

R-CALF Head Explains Strategy

agman

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
His comments are typical of R-Calf's so called leaders. He has several major flaws in his statements that lead directly to incorrect conclusions by him and its members, again typical of R-Calf's leadership and its members. Do you know enough to identify the incorrect statements, misrepresentation and false conclusions?

Facts will win out over false accusations and misrepresentation all the time; it is only a matter of time.

Feel free to point them out.

You've been claiming R-CALF is going down for the last couple of years and they keep growing. Have you ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? What about the man who didn't know what he was talking about?
 

agman

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
His comments are typical of R-Calf's so called leaders. He has several major flaws in his statements that lead directly to incorrect conclusions by him and its members, again typical of R-Calf's leadership and its members. Do you know enough to identify the incorrect statements, misrepresentation and false conclusions?

Facts will win out over false accusations and misrepresentation all the time; it is only a matter of time.

Feel free to point them out.

You've been claiming R-CALF is going down for the last couple of years and they keep growing. Have you ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? What about the man who didn't know what he was talking about?

Why should I? You are the one who would benefit from the truth rather than blindly following their leadership. Do a little research on your own.

R-Calf has peaked, you are just to blind to see that. They have been beaten at every turn. Their positions are the product of ignorance of the issues. They are on the outside looking in trying to tell everyone else how they should operate.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
agman said:
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
His comments are typical of R-Calf's so called leaders. He has several major flaws in his statements that lead directly to incorrect conclusions by him and its members, again typical of R-Calf's leadership and its members. Do you know enough to identify the incorrect statements, misrepresentation and false conclusions?

Facts will win out over false accusations and misrepresentation all the time; it is only a matter of time.

Feel free to point them out.

You've been claiming R-CALF is going down for the last couple of years and they keep growing. Have you ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? What about the man who didn't know what he was talking about?

Why should I? You are the one who would benefit from the truth rather than blindly following their leadership. Do a little research on your own.

R-Calf has peaked, you are just to blind to see that. They have been beaten at every turn. Their positions are the product of ignorance of the issues. They are on the outside looking in trying to tell everyone else how they should operate.

Why should you? Because anybody can flap their lips, or in this case, peck out a word or two on a keyboard. I know the truth. There are plenty of examples that illustrate the truth. It's not hard to see. I entered this fray a few years ago with an open mind and no pre-conceived notions. I see things all the time that only reinforce my beliefs.

I hope you're more accurate with your commodities predictions than you are on the demise of R-CALF. If you had been shorting R-CALF on an exchange for the same time you've been claiming we're going down, margin calls would of wiped you out long, long ago. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

agman

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
Sandhusker said:
Feel free to point them out.

You've been claiming R-CALF is going down for the last couple of years and they keep growing. Have you ever heard of the boy who cried wolf? What about the man who didn't know what he was talking about?

Why should I? You are the one who would benefit from the truth rather than blindly following their leadership. Do a little research on your own.

R-Calf has peaked, you are just to blind to see that. They have been beaten at every turn. Their positions are the product of ignorance of the issues. They are on the outside looking in trying to tell everyone else how they should operate.

Why should you? Because anybody can flap their lips, or in this case, peck out a word or two on a keyboard. I know the truth. There are plenty of examples that illustrate the truth. It's not hard to see. I entered this fray a few years ago with an open mind and no pre-conceived notions. I see things all the time that only reinforce my beliefs.

I hope you're more accurate with your commodities predictions than you are on the demise of R-CALF. If you had been shorting R-CALF on an exchange for the same time you've been claiming we're going down, margin calls would of wiped you out long, long ago. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I made the statement following the ruling on the Pickett case. When was that ruling? I quess you can't even get that correct. Par for someone with as little knowledge as you. :lol:
 

Econ101

Well-known member
agman said:
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
Why should I? You are the one who would benefit from the truth rather than blindly following their leadership. Do a little research on your own.

R-Calf has peaked, you are just to blind to see that. They have been beaten at every turn. Their positions are the product of ignorance of the issues. They are on the outside looking in trying to tell everyone else how they should operate.

Why should you? Because anybody can flap their lips, or in this case, peck out a word or two on a keyboard. I know the truth. There are plenty of examples that illustrate the truth. It's not hard to see. I entered this fray a few years ago with an open mind and no pre-conceived notions. I see things all the time that only reinforce my beliefs.

I hope you're more accurate with your commodities predictions than you are on the demise of R-CALF. If you had been shorting R-CALF on an exchange for the same time you've been claiming we're going down, margin calls would of wiped you out long, long ago. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I made the statement following the ruling on the Pickett case. When was that ruling? I quess you can't even get that correct. Par for someone with as little knowledge as you. :lol:

Agman, the fact that we have judges appointed by a president who is looting the country for himself and his buddies is the reason for that decision. GW does not care about laws and he has a bunch of republican lackeys that are protecting him now. If they don't turn around fast they may find themselves in a minority for many, many, years. It has happened before.

The Pickett decision didn't show Pickett was incorrect, it showed that now we have an elitist judicial system that doesn't mind following the president over the law. It is serious.

The recent poor polls may not all be related to Iraq. They may be related to issues so deep that all of your cronies in the USDA and the land grants are in trouble. I hope industry has enough positions for them, otherwise the unemployment rate may go up.
 

mrj

Well-known member
Econ101 said:
agman said:
Sandhusker said:
Why should you? Because anybody can flap their lips, or in this case, peck out a word or two on a keyboard. I know the truth. There are plenty of examples that illustrate the truth. It's not hard to see. I entered this fray a few years ago with an open mind and no pre-conceived notions. I see things all the time that only reinforce my beliefs.

I hope you're more accurate with your commodities predictions than you are on the demise of R-CALF. If you had been shorting R-CALF on an exchange for the same time you've been claiming we're going down, margin calls would of wiped you out long, long ago. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I made the statement following the ruling on the Pickett case. When was that ruling? I quess you can't even get that correct. Par for someone with as little knowledge as you. :lol:

Agman, the fact that we have judges appointed by a president who is looting the country for himself and his buddies is the reason for that decision. GW does not care about laws and he has a bunch of republican lackeys that are protecting him now. If they don't turn around fast they may find themselves in a minority for many, many, years. It has happened before.

The Pickett decision didn't show Pickett was incorrect, it showed that now we have an elitist judicial system that doesn't mind following the president over the law. It is serious.

The recent poor polls may not all be related to Iraq. They may be related to issues so deep that all of your cronies in the USDA and the land grants are in trouble. I hope industry has enough positions for them, otherwise the unemployment rate may go up.


Your anti-Bush rhetoric borders really close to a demented obsession!

Lets wait, maybe five years after Pres. Bush is out of office and compare just who enriched himself the most as a result of the presidency, Pres. Bush, or Pres. Clinton.

Do y;ou hate all who have wealth to the degree you appear to hate this president?

Did you assume the guilt of every Democrat the way you do every Republican who is ACCUSED (as opposed to actual charges and conviction) with any supposed crime or lapse of propriety?

You do continue to amaze us with the depth of your vitriol (one definition is "injurious writing")

MRJ.

MRJ
 

Econ101

Well-known member
MRJ said:
Econ101 said:
agman said:
I made the statement following the ruling on the Pickett case. When was that ruling? I quess you can't even get that correct. Par for someone with as little knowledge as you. :lol:

Agman, the fact that we have judges appointed by a president who is looting the country for himself and his buddies is the reason for that decision. GW does not care about laws and he has a bunch of republican lackeys that are protecting him now. If they don't turn around fast they may find themselves in a minority for many, many, years. It has happened before.

The Pickett decision didn't show Pickett was incorrect, it showed that now we have an elitist judicial system that doesn't mind following the president over the law. It is serious.

The recent poor polls may not all be related to Iraq. They may be related to issues so deep that all of your cronies in the USDA and the land grants are in trouble. I hope industry has enough positions for them, otherwise the unemployment rate may go up.


Your anti-Bush rhetoric borders really close to a demented obsession!

Lets wait, maybe five years after Pres. Bush is out of office and compare just who enriched himself the most as a result of the presidency, Pres. Bush, or Pres. Clinton.

Do y;ou hate all who have wealth to the degree you appear to hate this president?

Did you assume the guilt of every Democrat the way you do every Republican who is ACCUSED (as opposed to actual charges and conviction) with any supposed crime or lapse of propriety?

You do continue to amaze us with the depth of your vitriol (one definition is "injurious writing")

MRJ.

MRJ

MRJ, I didn't agree with Clinton's actions during the impeachment proceedings against him. I didn't agree with Tyson's chief counsel getting Mrs. Clinton inside trader information, and I didn't agree with her not getting in a lot more trouble for it.

I think we have come to in our country a type of "tribalism" of sorts. You happen to be a perfect example of it. Wealth is revered over character. Martin Luther King spoke about the tendency with his race. I think it is inevitable, having looked over much of history. It is unfortunate. If you are president of the U.S., you should not be able to hide your illegal or unethical behaviors just so you don't have to pay for it. You shouldn't get by with planned incompetence in government if you are in charge just because you can hide it with your political machine.

No one is above the law.

Bush is just as much a hipocrit as Clinton in this regards. They have both chosen their self interest over the public interest while in office and while getting paid to serve the public.

It bothers me that this is the "best" that comes to the top in our political process.

By the way, have you read the OIG report on GIPSA yet or are you sticking with your "tribe"?

It is because of the apathy of people like you that we have these problems and that they are allowed to prosper.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
agman said:
Sandhusker said:
agman said:
Why should I? You are the one who would benefit from the truth rather than blindly following their leadership. Do a little research on your own.

R-Calf has peaked, you are just to blind to see that. They have been beaten at every turn. Their positions are the product of ignorance of the issues. They are on the outside looking in trying to tell everyone else how they should operate.

Why should you? Because anybody can flap their lips, or in this case, peck out a word or two on a keyboard. I know the truth. There are plenty of examples that illustrate the truth. It's not hard to see. I entered this fray a few years ago with an open mind and no pre-conceived notions. I see things all the time that only reinforce my beliefs.

I hope you're more accurate with your commodities predictions than you are on the demise of R-CALF. If you had been shorting R-CALF on an exchange for the same time you've been claiming we're going down, margin calls would of wiped you out long, long ago. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I made the statement following the ruling on the Pickett case. When was that ruling? I quess you can't even get that correct. Par for someone with as little knowledge as you. :lol:

You think I can't come up with a prediction from you of R-CALF's demise from before Pickett? Are you a betting man?
 

Latest posts

Top