• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

"Racial Resentment Against Whites"

Mike

Well-known member
A federal appeals judge has upheld most of a 2010 Arizona state law that prohibits school districts from offering coursework that endorses the overthrow of the United States government or stokes resentment toward a race or class of people.

Friday’s ruling, by A. Wallace Tashima of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, declared three of the four sections of the law constitutional, reports the Arizona Daily Independent.

The ruling stems from a case concerning a school district’s intervention to forcibly alter coursework in a controversial Mexican-American studies program in Tucson schools. The highly race-conscious program taught history, civics and literature from a pointedly Mexican-American vantage point.

The judge agreed with a prior evidentiary finding by an administrative law judge that the program contained “classes or courses designed for Latinos as a group” and promoted “racial resentment against ‘Whites.’”

The relevant sections of the contested law, commonly known among locals as House Bill 2281, forbid Arizona school districts and charter schools from:

1. Promoting the overthrow of the United States government.
2. Promoting resentment toward a race or class of people.
3. Designing courses primarily for pupils of a particular ethnic group.
4. Advocating ethnic solidarity instead of the treatment of pupils as individuals.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/12/federal-judge-arizona-can-ban-classes-promoting-racial-resentment-against-whites/#ixzz2NQDZcNTV
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Promoting the overthrow of the United States government.
Promoting resentment toward a race or class of people.


They should investigate what's going on in DC today.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
What cost to the taxpayer, is associated with "educating" these illegals? And what cost is incurred by the taxpayer, for these illegals to go to court and gain their "rights"?



or $1.113 Trillion, over 10 years, with NO increase in the numbers of bodies...

According to a new report, Illegal Immigration costs U.S. Taxpayers a whopping $113 Billion annually and the government is arguing over where to cut the budget?
http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-political-commentary/2011/04/illegal-immigration-costs-u-s-taxpayers-113-billion-annually/



Heck, even 10 years of war, cost only a few dollars more...which "sandpit", and "Nation Building", are the Democrats funding, Mexico, or the Middle East.

March 29, 2011

Congress has approved a total of $1.283 trillion for military operations, base security,
reconstruction, foreign aid, embassy costs, and veterans’ health care for the three operations initiated
since the 9/11 attacks: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) Afghanistan and other counter terror
operations; Operation Noble Eagle (ONE), providing enhanced security at military bases; and
Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF).

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Mike said:
Are we past the point of no return yet?


2012, was the tipping point, IMO.


If it is to be corrected at this point, it will mean much more "hurt" and sacrifice, than it would have meant in 2012., if at all possible now.
 
Top