• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Raising Taxes Will Be "Lethal"

Mike

Well-known member
Barack Obama and the Economy: The Tax Questions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Vincent Gioia
Jul 25, 2008


If you believe as I do that the tax hikes proposed by Barack Obama and Democrats are bad for the country, then we are in good company. No less an authority than Nobel Prize winner and Columbia University economist Robert Mundell, a principal contributor to the creation of the euro, says that ending the Bush tax cuts — as proposed by presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama — would cause "a big recession, a nosedive."


In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Mundell said, "the most important thing that could be done with respect to tax rates is to make the Bush tax cuts permanent." Mundell, a recognized expert in many areas of economics including the theory that low taxes stimulate an economy, was also involved in the Reagan tax-cut revolution.

During the Reagan years tax cuts were a product of so-called "supply-side economics" approach to encouraging economic growth — Mundell says they were "as important to the United States as the creation of the euro was to Europe — a fundamental change."

Tax rates in the United States fluctuated wildly throughout the 20th century. The first income tax rate, which took an amendment to the constitution to establish, was 3% in 1913; it went up to 60% during World War I, and ultimately sky rocketed to a top rate of 92.5% during World War II.

After taxes were cut to 28% under Reagan, the economy began to boom and recover from the horrifying Carter years. However, the tax rate was then increased up to almost 40% percent during the Clinton administration. Taxes were cut by President George W. Bush to the dismay and anguish of Democrats in government.

Mundell says "Making the Bush tax cuts permanent would eliminate economic uncertainty and would be more important than pushing for a further cut ... in the income tax rates." Mundell also says that adding tax increases to the long list of financial woes afflicting the U.S. and global economies would be economically destructive; "the big issue economically ... is what's going to happen to taxes." Obviously not of concern to Democrats, and not honestly reported by the news media, eliminating the Bush tax cuts and restoring previous tax rates and rules, will amount to the largest tax increase in history.

Abruptly raising taxes could be "lethal," according to Mundell. "This would be devastating to the world economy, to the United States, and it would be, I think, political suicide," says Mundell.

An ideal rate, according to Mundell, would be a 30% ceiling on marginal rates, which he advocates. That would be 5 percent lower than the current 35 percent top rate. To further stimulate the economy, Mundell would cut the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. "It could be even lower." However although in my opinion businesses must pay taxes, placing too high a tax burden on business does two things: causes some businesses to close down and increases costs to consumers - neither of which are good for the economy.

Although After Jimmy Carter and Yassir Arafat awards of Nobel Prizes I don’t put much value on the award, Nobel Prize winner Robert Mendel’s track record shows he does know about economics and his opinions carry more weight.

Of course, we cannot expect the Democrats to relent on increasing taxes while in power and electing Barack Obama president will make higher taxes inevitable.

--Political Analysis by Vincent Gioia
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
So he thinks spending like a drunken sailor- and borrowing it from countries that hate us like China, Russia, and Venezuela-- for our Kids, Grandkids, and Great Grandkids unborn to repay is a better idea :???: :(

That was the Bush policy- much of which is the same as being echoed by McSame and his economic advisor Foreclosure Phil.....
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
So he thinks spending like a drunken sailor- and borrowing it from countries that hate us like China, Russia, and Venezuela-- for our Kids, Grandkids, and Great Grandkids unborn to repay is a better idea :???: :(

That was the Bush policy- much of which is the same as being echoed by McSame and his economic advisor Foreclosure Phil.....

Who said spending is good? Tax cuts and government spending are two seperate issues. They have no relationship to one another.

Raising taxes in hard economic times is plain stupid, anyone that took econ 101 would know that.

Government spending is also bad. That is why Obama is bad, he only promises spending and more taxes. McCain has made cutting pork a large part of his platform, sure he may not do it who knows he is a politician. But at least he is promising it, Obama promises just the opposite!

If there is one thing I do believe with McCain that is that he will veto any excessive pork bills, I may be wrong and really trust no politician. But my hunch is that he will be the stand he will take with congress to build his legacy around. The man has just about lived his entire life, he needs no money, but I think he values his legacy and he will do his best to go down in history as a good President.

I think Obama and his wife are Clinton like, they want the power, money and Hollywood lifestyles. I think he is a skinny cow looking to get fattened. And everyone knows it is easier to keep a fat cow fat than put weight on a skinny one!
 
Top