OldDog/NewTricks
Well-known member
V_Key and I have long felt this .Org is a PETA Cover Org. thats why we don't post their News Letters
Doughts Remover/Thanks USDA
Some People Question V_Key when she expresses an intent to use Non-Profits as a Career.
CEO's can Do Good or Bad and make good money - V_Key wants to do good!
AMP News - AR Groups: Who Gets the Money? - Corrected Version
2 January 2006
Animal People's Annual "Who Gets The Money" List
In its December 2005 edition, which was just released, the animal rights publication Animal People once again published its annual analysis of IRS reports by key animal rights/animal welfare groups. For those extremist groups involved in campaigns against the use of animals in research, the amount of money raised and budgeted increased in FY2004 in all but a couple of instances.
As you review these numbers, keep in mind that groups such as SHAC, Hugs for Puppies, and the Animal Defense League did not file tax documents for FY 2004, yet were responsible for the most visible attacks against research.
Also for your thoughts, here is how Americans for Medical Progress placed in FY2004 in the categories noted by Animal People. Clearly, the animal rights forces have much more in the way of finances to wage their campaigns. We need your support! Click here to donate to AMP and help us begin the New Year on the right note.
Jacquie/AMP
Americans for Medical Progress/AMP
raised/earned: $709,680
budget: $516,252
programs: $416,932
overhead: $99,320
net assets: $387,973
ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUPS
(figures in parentheses show FY2003/FY2002/FY2001budgets)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals/PETA
raised/earned: $28,072,597
budget: $25,063,060 ($16,414,174 /$13,499,614 /$17,668,699)
programs: $21,583,096
overhead: $3,479,964
net assets: $11,479,793
Foundation to Support Animal Protection/FSAP
budget: $3,294,816 ($2,192,281 / $2,430,555 / $2,610,200)
programs: $30,926
overhead: $3,263,890
net assets: $18,543,022
(Note that PETA was apparently the sole beneficiary of FSAP in FY2004. Animal People has consistently noted that FSAP serves as a place for PETA to locate some of its fundraising and management costs. From Animal People: "Attributing those costs to FSAP has the effect of concealing the true extent and nature of PETA spending and assets. If FSAP and PETA were seen as a single fundraising unit, they raised $31 million, spent $28.4 million; spent $18.6 million on programs; and their overhead expense came to $8.8 million, 31% of the budget. Their total assets were $30 million, 60% held by FSAP including 57% of the cash and securities. Their combined payroll was $6.1 million, of which FSAP paid $1.8 million - 29%." )
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine/PCRM
raised/earned: $10,180,959
budget: $10,683,823 ($2,667,912 /$2,915,847 / $2,533,289 )
programs: $410,086,265
overhead: $597,558
net assets: $2,756,346
PCRM Foundation
raised/earned: $5,823,902
budget: $1,616,079
programs: $1,493,415
overhead: $ 122,663
net assets: $8,597,066
(According to Animal People, the newly-created PCRM Foundation exists exclusively to perform services for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. If taken as a single entity, their combined overhead expense would be 21% of their total budget.)
American Anti-Vivisection Society/AAVS
raised/earned: $954,348
budget: $1,408,762 ($1,219,000 / $1,235,214 /$1,088,433)
programs: $1,101,108
overhead: $307,654
net assets: $16,620,677
Animal Legal Defense Fund/ALDF
raised/earned $3,581,142
budget: $3,072,467 ($3,208,308 / $3,360,728 / $3,133,399 )
programs: $2,403,676
overhead: $668,791
net assets: $3,560,815
Animal Welfare Institute/AWI
raised/earned: $2,913,514
budget: $1,426,742 ($1,260,416 /$1,072,951 / $1,169,280)
programs: $1,219,473
overhead: $ 207,269
net assets: $4,841,036
Humane Society of the United States/HSUS
raised/earned $74,015,068
budget: $70,306,473 ($67,272,795 / $58,865,207 / $50,431,797)
programs: $51,561,573
overhead: $16,210,212
net assets: $111,021,299
(Note that these figures do not include statistics from the Fund for Animals, which merged with HSUS at the end of 2004. In FY 2003, the Fund's budget was 7,358,158 and it had net assets amounting to nearly $20 million.)
In Defense of Animals/IDA
raised/earned: $3,194,409
budget: $3,150,113 ($2,304,433 / $2,339,784 /$1,841,705 )
programs: $2,642,963
overhead: $507,150
net assets: $3,301,045
Last Chance for Animals/LCA
raised/earned: $705,699
budget: $651,099
programs: $516,186
overhead: $134,913
net assets: $94,676
National Anti-Vivisection Society/NAVS
raised/earned: $1,665,144
budget: $1,840,996 ($2,810,328 / $2,657,596 / $2,620,228)
programs: $1,348,163
overhead: $492,833
net assets: $3,904,098
New England Anti Vivisection Society/NEAVS
raised/earned: $818,234
budget: $866,917 ($779,088 / $885,239 /$1,084,575)
programs: $723,981
overhead: $142,936
net assets: $7,175,451
Americans for Medical Progress
908 King Street, Suite 301 w Alexandria, VA 22314 w 703.836.9595
[email protected] w www.amprogress.org
This e-mail is part of AMP News Service and is intended for use in accordance with the Fair Use clauses to the U.S. Copyright Act.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It might do some good if we all sent a copy of this to our Rep's with our thoughts on the subject.
Doughts Remover/Thanks USDA
Some People Question V_Key when she expresses an intent to use Non-Profits as a Career.
CEO's can Do Good or Bad and make good money - V_Key wants to do good!
AMP News - AR Groups: Who Gets the Money? - Corrected Version
2 January 2006
Animal People's Annual "Who Gets The Money" List
In its December 2005 edition, which was just released, the animal rights publication Animal People once again published its annual analysis of IRS reports by key animal rights/animal welfare groups. For those extremist groups involved in campaigns against the use of animals in research, the amount of money raised and budgeted increased in FY2004 in all but a couple of instances.
As you review these numbers, keep in mind that groups such as SHAC, Hugs for Puppies, and the Animal Defense League did not file tax documents for FY 2004, yet were responsible for the most visible attacks against research.
Also for your thoughts, here is how Americans for Medical Progress placed in FY2004 in the categories noted by Animal People. Clearly, the animal rights forces have much more in the way of finances to wage their campaigns. We need your support! Click here to donate to AMP and help us begin the New Year on the right note.
Jacquie/AMP
Americans for Medical Progress/AMP
raised/earned: $709,680
budget: $516,252
programs: $416,932
overhead: $99,320
net assets: $387,973
ANIMAL RIGHTS GROUPS
(figures in parentheses show FY2003/FY2002/FY2001budgets)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals/PETA
raised/earned: $28,072,597
budget: $25,063,060 ($16,414,174 /$13,499,614 /$17,668,699)
programs: $21,583,096
overhead: $3,479,964
net assets: $11,479,793
Foundation to Support Animal Protection/FSAP
budget: $3,294,816 ($2,192,281 / $2,430,555 / $2,610,200)
programs: $30,926
overhead: $3,263,890
net assets: $18,543,022
(Note that PETA was apparently the sole beneficiary of FSAP in FY2004. Animal People has consistently noted that FSAP serves as a place for PETA to locate some of its fundraising and management costs. From Animal People: "Attributing those costs to FSAP has the effect of concealing the true extent and nature of PETA spending and assets. If FSAP and PETA were seen as a single fundraising unit, they raised $31 million, spent $28.4 million; spent $18.6 million on programs; and their overhead expense came to $8.8 million, 31% of the budget. Their total assets were $30 million, 60% held by FSAP including 57% of the cash and securities. Their combined payroll was $6.1 million, of which FSAP paid $1.8 million - 29%." )
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine/PCRM
raised/earned: $10,180,959
budget: $10,683,823 ($2,667,912 /$2,915,847 / $2,533,289 )
programs: $410,086,265
overhead: $597,558
net assets: $2,756,346
PCRM Foundation
raised/earned: $5,823,902
budget: $1,616,079
programs: $1,493,415
overhead: $ 122,663
net assets: $8,597,066
(According to Animal People, the newly-created PCRM Foundation exists exclusively to perform services for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. If taken as a single entity, their combined overhead expense would be 21% of their total budget.)
American Anti-Vivisection Society/AAVS
raised/earned: $954,348
budget: $1,408,762 ($1,219,000 / $1,235,214 /$1,088,433)
programs: $1,101,108
overhead: $307,654
net assets: $16,620,677
Animal Legal Defense Fund/ALDF
raised/earned $3,581,142
budget: $3,072,467 ($3,208,308 / $3,360,728 / $3,133,399 )
programs: $2,403,676
overhead: $668,791
net assets: $3,560,815
Animal Welfare Institute/AWI
raised/earned: $2,913,514
budget: $1,426,742 ($1,260,416 /$1,072,951 / $1,169,280)
programs: $1,219,473
overhead: $ 207,269
net assets: $4,841,036
Humane Society of the United States/HSUS
raised/earned $74,015,068
budget: $70,306,473 ($67,272,795 / $58,865,207 / $50,431,797)
programs: $51,561,573
overhead: $16,210,212
net assets: $111,021,299
(Note that these figures do not include statistics from the Fund for Animals, which merged with HSUS at the end of 2004. In FY 2003, the Fund's budget was 7,358,158 and it had net assets amounting to nearly $20 million.)
In Defense of Animals/IDA
raised/earned: $3,194,409
budget: $3,150,113 ($2,304,433 / $2,339,784 /$1,841,705 )
programs: $2,642,963
overhead: $507,150
net assets: $3,301,045
Last Chance for Animals/LCA
raised/earned: $705,699
budget: $651,099
programs: $516,186
overhead: $134,913
net assets: $94,676
National Anti-Vivisection Society/NAVS
raised/earned: $1,665,144
budget: $1,840,996 ($2,810,328 / $2,657,596 / $2,620,228)
programs: $1,348,163
overhead: $492,833
net assets: $3,904,098
New England Anti Vivisection Society/NEAVS
raised/earned: $818,234
budget: $866,917 ($779,088 / $885,239 /$1,084,575)
programs: $723,981
overhead: $142,936
net assets: $7,175,451
Americans for Medical Progress
908 King Street, Suite 301 w Alexandria, VA 22314 w 703.836.9595
[email protected] w www.amprogress.org
This e-mail is part of AMP News Service and is intended for use in accordance with the Fair Use clauses to the U.S. Copyright Act.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It might do some good if we all sent a copy of this to our Rep's with our thoughts on the subject.
