• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

REPORT INVESTIGATION 11TH CASE BSE CANADA 'ATYPICAL'

QUESTION

Well-known member
Oh SandH coming back for more. And with personal attacks and charachter assasination isn't that cute. And Oh so predictable. The total numbers come from the USDA it was originally posted on ranchers by flounder but is avalible from a link to the USDA. The numbers UTM's in the US tested is approximately 17.67% and the numbers for under 5 yrs are 71.4%. And these number do no include the UMT cattle reported as OTM cattle. So they are actually higher because of the fraud that has gone on. And you guys are testing the high risk animals :lol: :lol: :oops: :oops: Actually in the past 7 years the US has tested only 110,000 of cattle over seven years old. Not to mention only 0.8% of the total number tested were actually showing clinical signs of BSE give me a break the US and canada are testing the same populations. :roll: Yeah you guys are testing the high risk cattle like Canada :wink: :roll: And as for me finding all the cheating that has gone on i cannot as i do not know exactly how wide spread the problem is but it is proven. Unless these honest cheaters grow a conscience and start coming forward which is not likely.
As for my example it was meant to show that the production methods in japan are very different than in Canada or the US :roll: Afterall you wrote" same diseases same sorce" that statment implies that everything is equal and the cattle are fed and raised the same way, if you didn't mean that then state so. Being honest, a foreign concept for you ?
Again you are calling me a liar when it is proven that cheating has gone on in the US I'll quote you " Us producers cheat and coverup cases and the Canadians would never do that. OK,Q, enjoy your little world." You are insinuationg Canadians are cheating which has not and cannot be proven unlike in the US. Your courts support my arguements maybe you want to tell them they are wrong too.l: :oops: :oops:
Let me see i am making things up . What ever you need to believe :roll:
As for the end statement the common venacular response for bring it or bring something statement is Broughtn Biatch. If you want to use street language know the proper responses.
Keep searching even a blind mouse finds a crumb every so often.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
QUESTION said:
Oh SandH coming back for more. And with personal attacks and charachter assasination isn't that cute. And Oh so predictable. The total numbers come from the USDA it was originally posted on ranchers by flounder but is avalible from a link to the USDA. The numbers UTM's in the US tested is approximately 17.67% and the numbers for under 5 yrs are 71.4%. And these number do no include the UMT cattle reported as OTM cattle. So they are actually higher because of the fraud that has gone on. And you guys are testing the high risk animals :lol: :lol: :oops: :oops: Actually in the past 7 years the US has tested only 110,000 of cattle over seven years old. Not to mention only 0.8% of the total number tested were actually showing clinical signs of BSE give me a break the US and canada are testing the same populations. :roll: Yeah you guys are testing the high risk cattle like Canada :wink: :roll:

Horsecrap. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/newsroom/hot_issues/bse/downloads/BSEprev-estFINAL_7-20-06.pdf

As for my example it was meant to show that the production methods in japan are very different than in Canada or the US :roll: Afterall you wrote" same diseases same sorce" that statment implies that everything is equal and the cattle are fed and raised the same way, if you didn't mean that then state so. Being honest, a foreign concept for you ?

No it doesn't imply EVERYTHING IS EQUAL. It's the same disease (BSE), same source (feeding contaminated SRMs). It doesn't matter whether the animal ate the contaminated feed in a 100,000 head feedlot, a 10,000 head ranch or off the cleavage of a geisha girl.


Again you are calling me a liar when it is proven that cheating has gone on in the US I'll quote you " Us producers cheat and coverup cases and the Canadians would never do that. OK,Q, enjoy your little world." You are insinuationg Canadians are cheating which has not and cannot be proven unlike in the US. Your courts support my arguements maybe you want to tell them they are wrong too.l: :oops: :oops:

I'm insinuating that if you think honesty is a geographical phenonemon, you're delusinial. "We're getting them all" is a perfect example. That is a lie.

As for the end statement the common venacular response for bring it or bring something statement is Broughtn Biatch. If you want to use street language know the proper responses.

I don't use street language. That isn't common venacular where I live. That sounds like something an idiot would say.
 

QUESTION

Well-known member
This is so tiring, Believe what you want. No matter whether it is true or not as long as it suits your position :roll: Have people been caught fraudulently submitting samples for BSE testing from low risk cattle calling them high risk by lying about the age of the animals? where were they from Canada or the US ? Have downers been put in the human foodchain in the US without being tested or not ? How many cows have been found to have BSE at time of slaughter at a commercial processing facility? Your choice Canada or the US or both. How many BSE positives have been found in north america under 30 monts of age? Explain why the OIE projections for BSE/BASE positives match the number of posive confirmed cases in every country in the world except the US, care to explain that. Keep up your propaganda maybe one day someone will believe it. :p :eek: :lol:
 

Latest posts

Top