gmacbeef said:Just read in the Dayton Daily news tonight that there was a precinct in Dayton that voted 543 for Obama & ZERO for Romney with 6 votes for "Others" ? Sounds kinda fishy to me .............. :twisted:
hypocritexposer said:gmacbeef said:Just read in the Dayton Daily news tonight that there was a precinct in Dayton that voted 543 for Obama & ZERO for Romney with 6 votes for "Others" ? Sounds kinda fishy to me .............. :twisted:
there were quite a few districts, across the Country, that voted 99% for obama and where the votes were up to 120% of registered voters.
jcummins said:hypocritexposer said:gmacbeef said:Just read in the Dayton Daily news tonight that there was a precinct in Dayton that voted 543 for Obama & ZERO for Romney with 6 votes for "Others" ? Sounds kinda fishy to me .............. :twisted:
there were quite a few districts, across the Country, that voted 99% for obama and where the votes were up to 120% of registered voters.
Hypo...what's your source on that? I want to spread that information.
“They were calling Florida for Obama, they were separated by 40,000 votes, Pinellas County had just announced ‘we’ve set aside 10,000 ballots that we won’t count until tomorrow’….this is the stuff that’s really going on, there were 400,000 uncounted provisional ballots in Arizona and there were massive meltdowns in Pima County….so we are just now beginning to unravel what really happened during this election,” said Harris.
Washington State, where I live, is a forced absentee state, where 100% of the votes are now absentee ballots, which must be postmarked on Election Day. I placed my ballot in the post office at 2 pm. There are no exit polls, because there are no polling places. Apparently a few phone calls now substitute for actual exit polling (to people with land lines? That's an increasingly elderly demographic). Perhaps 40% of all ballots in Washington have not even been counted yet, but we've been told the results.
Hmm: Obama Received Over 98% in Dozens of VA Districts, Often in Odd (But Similar) Patterns
In looking at the voting data from Richmond, Virginia, an observer is struck by a few things. First is that Mitt Romney and Barack Obama were running neck-and-neck for the first several precincts. Even in heavily democratic precincts, Romney was still garnering around 25-30% of the vote.
Then, all of a sudden, all in order, starting with Precinct 213, Obama received: 90.30% of the vote, then 95.91%, then 89.62%, then 94.68%, then 97.49%, then 94.16%, then 95.09%. Before these Obama numbers began, Romney had gotten over 30% of the vote, and after they finished, Romney shot back up to 23%.
But this wasn't the only "blip" on the radar. Mr. Obama received over 99% of the vote in two precincts in Richmond, over 98% in another two, and over 97% in four. And they all came in peculiar fashion.
Voters in the same districts would go slightly towards Romney or slightly for Obama, then six or seven in a row would be plus-90% for Obama... then go back to slightly for one of the candidates, then again, another five or six in a row 90% for Obama.
The same odd pattern showed up in Norfolk, Virginia. Precincts would be relatively close, going to Obama or Romney. Then they'd explode towards Obama. For example, starting with Precinct 311, Obama received 68.97%, then exploded to 98.08% of the vote, then 98.21%, then 99.05%, then 97.86%, then 97.96%, then immediately dropped to 58.66%. And these heavily-Obama precincts were not all in the same city, but various cities through Virginia.
It's a good thing the vote in Virginia wasn't close, though, right?