RoperAB said:Steve said:The Neo Cons on here dont seem to have the stomach for it either or whenever I have talked about ways of wrapping things up, everybody on here gets quiet.
Just blows my mind how some seem to care more about the well being of Jihad fanatics
I never did quite understand the Neo-con label....so I looked it up...
.,...neo- refers to two ways in which neoconservatism was new. First, many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism. Also, neoconservatism was a comparatively recent strain of conservative socio-political thought.
so in effect the NEO CONs every one complains about are just liberals that tried to be conservatives?
I must be an old conservative......
I don't care how you kill a radical Jihad Muslum Terrorist......shoot him (or her)....lynch them,,blow them up...just Kill them.....
so who are the so called Neo-cons?
To me a neo-con is somebody who cheats a Vet out of his pension. Who sends his saddle horse to slaughter instead of out to pasture. Who divorces his wife for a younger one. Who discards employees when they get hurt or start to get old.
Neo-Cons tend to be born on third base but think they have hit a triple.
To me neo cons preach Duty, Valour, Virtue, Loyality but yet they dont practice what they preach.
If somebody will do anything for a buck, I would tend to think of them as a Neo-Con.
Compare alot of current Conservatives to old time Conservatives like Theodore Roosevelt or Dwight D. Eisenhower. IMO There really is no resemblance.
Roper, that puts you to the left of the righties and makes you a centrist. Now you can be called a liberal by the neocons but who cares. To them Rush Limbaugh is liberal (actually in many ways he is on top of being a hypocrit).