• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

"Same Sex Marriage"

Mike

Well-known member
Barack Obama: "I do not support gay marriage. Marriage has religious and social connotations, and I consider marriage to be between a man and a woman."

Given the vilification of Miss California for her comments on same sex marriage, why is Zer0 not getting stones thrown at him for the above statement?

Seems as though the Moonbats want their cake and eat it too?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
backhoeboogie said:
Obama sure goes against the grain for libs on this board with that statement.

Actually I think he follows the beliefs of many liberals, independents, and some conservatives-myself included- that do not support gay marriages- but believe they should be able to enter into recognized civil unions/contracts that grant them all the rights ( joint tax returns, community property, inheritance, etc.) of a married couple....
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
backhoeboogie said:
Obama sure goes against the grain for libs on this board with that statement.

Actually I think he follows the beliefs of many liberals, independents, and some conservatives-myself included- that do not support gay marriages- but believe they should be able to enter into recognized civil unions/contracts that grant them all the rights ( joint tax returns, community property, inheritance, etc.) of a married couple....

Common law shack ups give you many of these rights. If you don't believe it try to get out of the common law existance and see if the court doesn't hold you responsible for half the debts as well as divest you of half the assets and get them to the "partner".
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
backhoeboogie said:
Obama sure goes against the grain for libs on this board with that statement.

Actually I think he follows the beliefs of many liberals, independents, and some conservatives-myself included- that do not support gay marriages- but believe they should be able to enter into recognized civil unions/contracts that grant them all the rights ( joint tax returns, community property, inheritance, etc.) of a married couple....

Common law shack ups give you many of these rights. If you don't believe it try to get out of the common law existance and see if the court doesn't hold you responsible for half the debts as well as divest you of half the assets and get them to the "partner".

Yep-- you are right-- but in that same vein, most governments don't recognize common law shack ups for same sex couples either-- no matter if they've been together for 40-50 years and acquired $ of property together...Thats why they need the civil unions/contracts that are recognized by the courts....
 

Mike

Well-known member
No need for a civil union.....a simple contract between two indivduals can suffice to share property or assets in any manner needed.

The pro Gay Marriage argument is only to lessen the religious & social sanctities and cause a degradation on society as a whole.

It's just common sense that two men or two women can't be "Married", by any reasonable definition. :???: :???: :???:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
No need for a civil union.....a simple contract between two indivduals can suffice to share property or assets in any manner needed.

The pro Gay Marriage argument is only to lessen the religious & social sanctities and cause a degradation on society as a whole.

It's just common sense that two men or two women can't be "Married", by any reasonable definition. :???: :???: :???:

Problem is a simple contract doesn't give them the abiltity to file joint tax returns, to be on many family health care insurance plans, to get the same inheritance percentages and benefits as a spouse does, etc. etc...
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
No need for a civil union.....a simple contract between two indivduals can suffice to share property or assets in any manner needed.

The pro Gay Marriage argument is only to lessen the religious & social sanctities and cause a degradation on society as a whole.

It's just common sense that two men or two women can't be "Married", by any reasonable definition. :???: :???: :???:

Problem is a simple contract doesn't give them the abiltity to file joint tax returns, to be on many family health care insurance plans, to get the same inheritance percentages and benefits as a spouse does, etc. etc...

Those haven't been a problem for over 200 years, why would it be one now? Or has our Social & Religuous structure deviated to a lower value? :roll:

Get this.........the last CWA (Communication Workers of America) contract with AT&T allowed workers who have same sex living partners to share in the insurance plan, but not workers who have opposite sex living partners.

Bottom line. Marriage and rights to marriage amenities should be for Men and Women partnerships only........
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
Obama sure goes against the grain for libs on this board with that statement.


Not this one so called liberal, as it's HIS opinion....Miss CA has her opinion....I have mine....and you all have yours....that's why this IS AMERICA....remember???? :roll:
 

jigs

Well-known member
I am all for gay marriage....but both chicks MUST be hot.....




put all the homos on islands, men on one, women on another.... in 100 years, if they have doubled thier numbers, then give them what ever they want.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
jigs said:
I am all for gay marriage....but both chicks MUST be hot.....




put all the homos on islands, men on one, women on another.... in 100 years, if they have doubled thier numbers, then give them what ever they want.




You just proved my point........... next..........................
 

hopalong

Well-known member
jigs said:
I am all for gay marriage....but both chicks MUST be hot.....
put all the homos on islands, men on one, women on another.... in 100 years, if they have doubled thier numbers, then give them what ever they want.

leaves kolo out :D
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
hopalong said:
jigs said:
I am all for gay marriage....but both chicks MUST be hot.....
put all the homos on islands, men on one, women on another.... in 100 years, if they have doubled thier numbers, then give them what ever they want.

leaves kolo out :D




2nd one just chimed in.....
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
hopalong said:
jigs said:
I am all for gay marriage....but both chicks MUST be hot.....
put all the homos on islands, men on one, women on another.... in 100 years, if they have doubled thier numbers, then give them what ever they want.

leaves kolo out :D




2nd one just chimed in.....

Do I count? "Same sex marriage" should be having the same old sex with the lady you are married to - right?
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Seems to me...............that only the "hick" men and perverts and the sanctimonious here are against gay marriage.

One major problem is that the libs use the reasoning that gay people should be allowed to marry because it's their right to be happy - but then when you use their own arguements on incestual couples and/or multiple wives/husbands, it's a different deal. Maybe were just saving you from your own hypocricy.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Seems to me...............that only the "hick" men and perverts and the sanctimonious here are against gay marriage.

One major problem is that the libs use the reasoning that gay people should be allowed to marry because it's their right to be happy - but then when you use their own arguements on incestual couples and/or multiple wives/husbands, it's a different deal. Maybe were just saving you from your own hypocricy.


...and we now have contestant #3
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
kolanuraven said:
hopalong said:
leaves kolo out :D




2nd one just chimed in.....

Do I count? "Same sex marriage" should be having the same old sex with the lady you are married to - right?


Cute analogy...but sorry baby....don't count!!

You can't bea member of Hoppys,jigs and Huskers club it seems like.

Sorry :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Seems to me...............that only the "hick" men and perverts and the sanctimonious here are against gay marriage.

One major problem is that the libs use the reasoning that gay people should be allowed to marry because it's their right to be happy - but then when you use their own arguements on incestual couples and/or multiple wives/husbands, it's a different deal. Maybe were just saving you from your own hypocricy.


...and we now have contestant #3

Just stating fact. Can you refute?
 
Top