One of the cases before SCOTUS is "Proposition 8", a legally qualified state proposition voted on by the people of California whether to allow the right to full marriage status between those of the same sex. It was voted down.
The court has been asked to decide whether the Ca. voter's wishes should be upheld? I don't get it.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/fullpage/sex-marriage-sex-marriage-status-united-states-state-16715343
The other measure is "Defense Of Marriage Act", or "DOMA". A law passed and signed by Clinton on making a marriage strictly between a man and a woman. Clinton, Buckwheat, and several politicians have changed their minds and are now saying the law was "Unconstitutional".
All of this crap is mind boggling. Just as murder is illegal and has been throughout history in the USA, so has marriage between same sexes.
Is SCOTUS supposed to change morality based laws depending on popularity at that time?
We are going down a huge slippery slope based on the "Laws Of Nature" and morals. How far does this go?
The case of Windsor is interesting in that she and her same sex spouse were married in Canada and the crux of the suit is because of a tax return denial in the State of New York.
So same sex marriage all boils down to money.........................
The court has been asked to decide whether the Ca. voter's wishes should be upheld? I don't get it.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/fullpage/sex-marriage-sex-marriage-status-united-states-state-16715343
The other measure is "Defense Of Marriage Act", or "DOMA". A law passed and signed by Clinton on making a marriage strictly between a man and a woman. Clinton, Buckwheat, and several politicians have changed their minds and are now saying the law was "Unconstitutional".
All of this crap is mind boggling. Just as murder is illegal and has been throughout history in the USA, so has marriage between same sexes.
Is SCOTUS supposed to change morality based laws depending on popularity at that time?
We are going down a huge slippery slope based on the "Laws Of Nature" and morals. How far does this go?
The case of Windsor is interesting in that she and her same sex spouse were married in Canada and the crux of the suit is because of a tax return denial in the State of New York.
So same sex marriage all boils down to money.........................