• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sarah Palin backs Phil Robertson, has no idea what he said.

littlejoe

Well-known member
True story. Like---how ya' gonna make up stuff like this?!

And I guess her and ol' Phil had new yrs together.

Duck Boy and Bird Brain.

Bet they had fun child-proofing that set.

the link:
http://www.examiner.com/article/sarah-palin-backs-phil-robertson-has-no-idea-what-he-said

he larry~~rowf! quack! and--a new one---cheep!
 

Larrry

Well-known member
If you and ot would quit tea bagging each other maybe you could tell us all the great things the obama regime has done (in compliance to the Constitution )
 

Steve

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
True story. Like---how ya' gonna make up stuff like this?!

And I guess her and ol' Phil had new yrs together.

Duck Boy and Bird Brain.

Bet they had fun child-proofing that set.

the link:
http://www.examiner.com/article/sarah-palin-backs-phil-robertson-has-no-idea-what-he-said

he larry~~rowf! quack! and--a new one---cheep!

there were many others celebrities and TV "hosts" who denounced Phil Robertson without reading the article as well..

but you don't see the media picking apart their comments..



Palin's position in the clip was to defend his right to free speech.. and her not reading it first is sloppy journalism.. but what he said is NOT relevant if you take a FREE SPEECH stand..




http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-06-29-first-amendment-quiz_n.htm
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
I have no idea what littlejoe will say next, yet I still believe he has the right to say it.

It's less about lacking the right to say something stupid as much as it is about the inability to not.

He adds a lot of noise to the discussion, he just forgets to add substance. Reminds me of someone else. Maybe a match made in Hollywood... two lonely Montanans, a long 3 miles from town, a vandetta against anyone that calls homosexuality a perversion.
 

Tam

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
True story. Like---how ya' gonna make up stuff like this?!

And I guess her and ol' Phil had new yrs together.

Duck Boy and Bird Brain.

Bet they had fun child-proofing that set.

the link:
http://www.examiner.com/article/sarah-palin-backs-phil-robertson-has-no-idea-what-he-said

he larry~~rowf! quack! and--a new one---cheep!


Let's see Palin backed Robertson without read the article and Nancy Pelosi and every Democrat in Washington Passed Obamacare WITHOUT READING IT.

Palin is a private citizen that backed someone's right to freedom of speech and the other is an elected official that destroyed the once great US Medical system.
Tell us littlejoe which one was the real stupid act that caused a disaster that affects hundreds of millions of lives? :? Who backed the rights of a faithful man and who backed the guy with the LIE OF THE YEAR and 3 of the top 5 4 star Pinnoccioes for 2013?

Do you care to guess who Pelosi spent New Years with? :? I'm betting it wasn't a redneck with the number one show on Cable with good family values that are looked up to by his millions of viewers. I'm betting it was one of those 1%ers that her and Obama keep spewing their hateful garbage about so they can divide the US to push their leftwing agenda onto the have nots. BTW Phil was duck hunting at home and Sarah was with her family in Alaska and you would have known that if you watched FOX. :wink:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Lets see
oldtimer hates Bush
lives in Mt
hates Sarah
loves Obama
is 90% clueless
wets his depends


little joe hates Bush
lives in MT
hates Sarah loves obama
is 90% clueless
wets his depends

add in the fact both are huge fans of borowitz sure makes one wonder

oldtimer denys it but we know that he is untruthful sure is a lot of very SIMILAR wording and content of in their posts...

sure looks like one and the same :D :D :D :D :D :D :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
 

Tam

Well-known member
OH AND do you remember Obama's saying the Cambridge Police acted stupidly little joe? Did he know how his black friend was acting when he was arrested and later released or did he make his stupid comment without knowing the whole story? :?

How many Presidents have had BEER SUMMITS over a private matter that if he wasn't a race baiting idiot would not have made the national news?

Remember Obama saying if he had a son he would have looked like Trayvon Martin when he stuck his nose into an issue that proved the police were right by not charging an innocent man and only charge him after the fact because Obama and other race baiters forced them to, to push their racist agenda . How much do you think that trial cost the US tax payers a bit more than Obama's beer summit I'm betting. :wink:

See how stupid you look by trying to point out Palin didn't know what was said? She was backing Phil's and YOUR right to freedom of speech. Yep she should be made fun of. :roll:

I'm surprised you have not posted the story about as a religious person, Palin had a Christmas Tree. OH :shock: the shame of it all a religious person dared to decorate her house with a CHRISTMAS TREE. Yep the left are tearing her down for the fact she had a Christmas tree. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
ranch hand said:
Little Joe is Oldtimer or his son. I don't think his son is that stupid.

Nope- I don't know Little Joe- but it is neither me or my son... I think Little Joe is just a normal Montanan- one who thinks for himself and doesn't let cult leaders herd him around like sheep! The reason Montana is known as a "purple state" - with many Independents and Libertarians...

The best on old Duckman just came out-- his advice to young men... Marry 15-16 year olds cause they can better "pick your ducks"- make sure they can cook...
Sounds like the old southern Hillbilly sexist attitude of keep them home barefoot and pregnant- and have the hot possum on the table when I get home ... :roll: :wink: :p :lol:

After seeing what a dummy Palin is and how bad she screwed up a campaign, maybe he is right... Somebody should have kept her home! :wink:



'Duck Dynasty' Star Phil Robertson Advises Men To Marry 15-Year-Old Girls


Posted: 12/31/2013 3:01 am EST | Updated: 12/31/2013 3:17 am EST
.

Phil Robertson is no stranger to controversy. Just days after his anti-gay and racially insensitive comments appeared in GQ magazine, he was temporarily suspended from his popular A&E show "Duck Dynasty." When fans complained, the network reinstated him. Now, he's back in the headlines for a newly surfaced video.

The 2009 footage, which was posted on Youtube, shows the 67-year-old reality TV star speaking at a Christian retreat in Georgia. During the speech, he tells a story about advising a young man to find a good Christian girl and marry her.

“Make sure that she can cook a meal. You need to eat some meals that she cooks, check that out. Make sure she carries her Bible. That’ll save you a lot of trouble down the road," Robertson said.

He then went on to say that men should wed girls who are young.


“They got to where they're getting hard to find, mainly because these boys are waiting ‘til they get to be about 20 years old before they marry 'em,” Robertson said. “Look, you wait ‘til they get to be 20 years old the only picking that’s going to take place is your pocket. You got to marry these girls when they are about 15 or 16. They’ll pick your ducks."

Robertson married his wife Kay when she was just 16 years old, The New York Daily News reported. In the state of Louisiana, such unions are legal with parental consent.

This type of "river rat counseling" is bound to raise eyebrows among network brass.

In the GQ interview, Robertson called homosexuality a sin and likened it bestiality.

“Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong. Sin becomes fine," Robertson said. “Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men. Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers -- they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

In that same article, Robertson also claimed black people were happy before the civil rights era.

“I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field.... They’re singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!... Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues,” Robertson said.

The interview prompted the cable network to bench Robertson and release the following statement: “We are extremely disappointed to have read Phil Robertson’s comments in GQ, which are based on his own personal beliefs and are not reflected in the series 'Duck Dynasty.' His personal views in no way reflect those of A&E Networks.”



He's even got the Christian Science Monitor questioning his advice.. :wink:


Phil Robertson of 'Duck Dynasty' has a new controversy: A video has surfaced in which he counsels men to marry young teen brides. While that's legal, it's not necessarily sage advice, data show.
------

In the video, Robertson couches his advice to marry ‘em early by saying, “You need to check with mom and dad about that, of course.” Indeed, most states allow 16-year-olds to marry as long as parents consent and attend the ceremony. Some US states allow teens under 16 to marry, but only if a judge OKs the nuptials. Some states allow a pregnant teenager to wed without mom and dad’s blessings.
------------------
Statistics also suggest that the core of Robertson’s argument – that younger brides make better marriages – may not be sage advice. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded in 2001 that nearly half of those who marry younger than 18 are divorced 10 years later, compared with 24 percent of those who marry after age 25. The marriage age of women in the US has risen from just over 20 in 1950 to nearly 27 today.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Society/2013/1231/Duck-Dynasty-star-told-men-to-marry-15-year-old-girls.-Is-that-even-legal
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
hopalong said:
Lets see
oldtimer hates Bush
lives in Mt
hates Sarah
loves Obama
is 90% clueless
wets his depends


little joe hates Bush
lives in MT
hates Sarah loves obama
is 90% clueless
wets his depends

add in the fact both are huge fans of borowitz sure makes one wonder

oldtimer denys it but we know that he is untruthful sure is a lot of very SIMILAR wording and content of in their posts...

sure looks like one and the same :D :D :D :D :D :D :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

heya hoppy===can you show me even ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I ever bragged up Obama?!

he's a dope. just not a funny one.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
I think 15-16 is too young to marry.

But, he`s no crazier for saying that, than as the `lefties`that think a girl that age should be able to buy the morning after pill, or get an abortion, without parental permission
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
7 Tips for Keeping Your Man (from the 1950s).


Therese Oneill



Woman, you have no idea how lucky you are to have landed a man. But as the literature of the mid-century’s greatest matrimonial minds tells us, he’s one wrinkled shirt away from leaving you. Eyes open and mouth shut ladies. It’s about to get real.

1. Don't Talk

Oh, did Mavis from next door insult your prize winning squash? Did little Timmy get sent home for starting fires again? That shooting pain in your left arm just keeps getting more intense? Keep it to yourself! Your man works all through his day and the last thing he needs to hear about is yours. Refer to the first four commandments on “How to be a Good Wife” Edward Podolsky gives in his 1943 book, Sex Today in Wedded Life:


Don’t bother your husband with petty troubles and complaints when he comes home from work.

Be a good listener. Let him tell you his troubles; yours will seem trivial in comparison.

Remember your most important job is to build up and maintain his ego (which gets bruised plenty in business). Morale is a woman’s business.

Let him relax before dinner. Discuss family problems after the inner man has been satisfied.

In his 1951 book, Sex Satisfaction and Happy Marriage, Reverend Alfred Henry Tyrer has more to add to that. Do not ask for things. This is called "nagging":


I verily believe that the happiness of homes is destroyed more frequently by the habit of nagging than by any other one. A man may stand that sort of thing (nagging) for a long time, but the chances are against his standing it permanently. If he needs peace to make life bearable, he will have to look for it elsewhere than in his own house. And it is quite likely that he will look.

Unless your husband wants you to talk. Then don’t you dare disappoint him. Says Reverend Tyrer:


“If [the husband] is intellectually inclined, and from time to time seeks to explain little things to her so that she may have at least a bare knowledge of what it is that interests him, and, without the slightest comment, she takes up again the fashion magazine she laid down when he commenced to speak, we may be pretty sure that there is going to be a ‘rift in the lute’ sooner or later in that house.”

2. Bad cooking will drive your man to seedy saloons

My god woman, this turkey tastes like wet toilet paper stuffed inside a burnt basketball. Have you no pride? Oh, you had a late shift at the hospital and then went straight to Timmy’s intervention? No excuses! Heed Reverend Tyrer!


A social service meeting, an afternoon tea, a matinee, a whatnot, is no excuse for there being no dinner ready when a husband comes home from a hard day’s work.

Housekeeping accomplishments and cooking ability are, of course, positive essentials in any true home, and every wife should take a reasonable pride in her skill. Happiness does not flourish in an atmosphere of dyspepsia.

Or listen to the even more plain-spoken Dr. William Josephus Robinson:


Bad cooking is responsible for dyspepsia, dyspepsia is responsible for grouchiness and irritability, grouchiness and irritability lead to quarrels and squabbles. And bad cooking, which is the usual thing in the average American home, has been responsible as much as any other factor for driving the husband to the saloon, and to other places. And when she does cook, she should cook, and not be, as somebody said, a mere can opener.

If you didn’t want your husband to become a syphilitic alcoholic, you should have learned to make a damn pot roast properly.

3. Be the Hot Steak, Not the Cheap Pork

Speaking of cooking, Reverend Tyrer has a metaphor for you.

Picture a woman preparing a fine meal for her husband. “She remembered his choice of meat and was careful to get an extra-fine cut…her best cutlery and dishes and finest linen are all in evidence, and a little colorful decoration has been tastefully displayed….and as he comes into the house she greets him with a smile of welcome and a touch of manifest love.” Now, say that linen was a bed sheet, the colorful little decoration was fuzzy handcuffs, and you had the privilege of being that extra fine cut of meat. What does all that equal? A husband who doesn’t cheat on you!

But say that same wife "is constantly setting him down to indigestible meals, cold and unappetizing, with nothing properly cooked, set out on a kitchen table with a dirty cloth, she need not be surprised if her husband frequently telephones from the office that business will prevent him from being home for dinner."

All because you weren’t properly cooked when he was hungry!

4. But don't be a Sexual Vampire or a Frigid Franny

Of course, as Dr. Robinson tells us, it is possible to be over-cooked. Then you become a “sexual vampire” and you will drive your husband to his grave, feasting on his life force.


Just as the vampire sucks the blood of its victims in their sleep while they are alive, so does the woman vampire suck the life and exhaust the vitality of her male partner—or "victim."

It is to be borne in mind that it is particularly older girls—girls between thirty and fifty—who are apt to be unreasonable in their demands when they get married; but no age is exempt; sexual vampires may be found among girls of twenty as well as among women of sixty and over.

The opposite of that is to be frigid, of course. That means you take no particular pleasure from the sexual act with your husband. Oh, "we should talk it out openly and honestly," you say? Maybe see a doctor, a therapist?

You disgust me. What do you think that will do to your husband’s ego? Listen to Dr. Robinson and save your marriage!


Now, if you are one of those frigid or sexually anesthetic women, don’t be in a hurry to inform your husband about it. To the man it makes no difference in the pleasurableness of the act whether you are frigid or not unless he knows that you are frigid. And he won’t know unless you tell him, and what he doesn’t know won’t hurt him. Heed this advice. It has saved thousands of women from trouble.

5. Pink Panties are a must

And while we’re on the subject of you performing convincingly in the boudoir, you better be costumed correctly, too.


That the underwear should be spotlessly clean goes without saying, but every woman should wear the best quality underwear that she can afford. And the color should be preferably pink. And lace and ruffles, I am sorry to say, add to the attractiveness of underwear, and are liked by the average man.

6. Let him have a little fun now and then

What if your man strays after marriage? Well, Dr. Robinson is here for you again. He says that ultimately, a wife will react to infidelity as her heart dictates. But he still offers some advice.

Get over it.


But in case of an occasional lapse on the part of the husband—there a bit of advice may prove acceptable. And my advice would be: forgive and forget. Or still better—make believe that you know nothing. An occasional lapse from the straight path does not mean that he has ceased to love you. He may love you as much; he may love you a good deal more.

7. Your Husband is The Boss Of You


It is fitting to close with a simple truism from the renowned Eugenicist Prof. B.G. Jefferis, in his Searchlights on Health, The Science of Eugenics:


The Number One Rule. Reverence Your Husband.—He sustains by God’s order a position of dignity as head of a family, head of the woman. Any breaking down of this order indicates a mistake in the union, or a digression from duty.

Stop talking, slap on some pink drawers, and start worshipping!

.

Read the full text here: http://mentalfloss.com/article/52108/7-tips-keeping-your-man-1950s#ixzz2pC2mL9Oj
--brought to you by mental_floss!

As long as the Hillbilly/Teabag crew support going back to the 50's (1850's :???: )-- we might as well follow all the old rules ! :wink: :p :lol:

I could just see some of the women on this site following these- especially Rule #1... :p :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
Who follows the cult Oldtimer? What party votes with their leaders, Obama, Reid and Pelosi with out reading what they voted for? What party thinks for themselves and then the left gets upset that they don't follow their leader on everything? You are just trying throwing **** against the wall hoping someone will argue with you as the old watering hole people are tired of you. I even know this for a fact.
 

Triangle Bar

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
I have no idea what littlejoe will say next, yet I still believe he has the right to say it.

Yeah hypo if only the left would adopt the simple principle.
"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

...but I forgot the left and principles is by definition an oxymoron.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Triangle Bar said:
hypocritexposer said:
I have no idea what littlejoe will say next, yet I still believe he has the right to say it.

Yeah hypo if only the left would adopt the simple principle.
"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

...but I forgot the left and principles is by definition an oxymoron.


Yep the tolerant left strikes again "do as I say not as I do" :roll:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Amazes me that the leftists are worried about what Sarah Palin & Phil Robertson are saying and how important the leftwingnut idiots think they really are?

This is much too funny.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
ranch hand said:
Who follows the cult Oldtimer? What party votes with their leaders, Obama, Reid and Pelosi with out reading what they voted for? What party thinks for themselves and then the left gets upset that they don't follow their leader on everything? You are just trying throwing s*** against the wall hoping someone will argue with you as the old watering hole people are tired of you. I even know this for a fact.



That is exactly what the snowbirds that are from where oldtimer lives.and spend the winter months parked at my place tell me... last year they followed almost every post he made shaking their heads in embarrassment that he brings to the residents of Valley County MT.... This year not so much as the say it makes them cringe so see how far he has fallen from the respect he once had,, which was never a lot
 
Top