• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sarah Palin Does Not Understand Cap and Trade

Mike

Well-known member
This hit piece on Sarah is trash.

If she were the only skeptic of Cap & Trade, I might feel the author has a point. But to single her out on the subject is clearly another way to use her as a whipping post.

If the program were so cut and dry, it would have passed all of Congress by now at the insistence of the voters.

But when the EPA itself says Cap & Trade won't "materially" change CO2 amounts, we must all wonder what are the advantages to spending Billions?

Why are Dems so afraid of Sarah? :roll:
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Mike,

This is just Michael O'Conner Clarke using her name to publicize his agenda.

If he had written his agenda without her name in it, few folks would have read it.

Just more people using her name for headliners.

Reader bit on it.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
Mike,

This is just Michael O'Conner Clarke using her name to publicize his agenda.

If he had written his agenda without her name in it, few folks would have read it.

Just more people using her name for headliners.

Reader bit on it.

Check ot Conor Clarke on the interent!! Obvious he has an agenda that makes him seem credable, and fails badly.
And we all know that there is so much green jealousy of Sarah by 3 of our female posters on here that it all they can do to keep from peeing in their panties when they find any kind of a negitive article abouit her.

In her rush to post this article we know reqder wet herself at least twice :wink: :wink:
 

MsSage

Well-known member
Have you really thought what cap & trade will cost you?
Have you sat down and looked at what this will do for the envirnment?
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
MsSage said:
Have you really thought what cap & trade will cost you?
Have you sat down and looked at what this will do for the envirnment?

If someone hasn't already considered this, they are way behind times. This is old news. Obama is anti-nuclear and anti-coal for electric power. He is all about getting oil from overseas which is going to set us back to the position we were in before.

MsSage you are familiar with the de-regulation utilities have goen through here in Texas. Most have already aligned their business plans. Now everyone is having to re-think them and it has been ongoing for months. Gears have shifted. What is not known is how long this will last and who will be the next president and what will be his agenda.

The phone companies, airlines, electric companies and many others went through de-regulation. Now we are moving back towards regulation including health care, bankings - savings and loans, and even the auto industry. Utilities are paying close attention and wondering if they are going to go back 15 to 20 years.

Why is reader rapping about this now? Cap and trade is far more than this summary and this idiot grabbing Palin's shirt tail for a headline.

We have hammered this issues individually on this forum. Apparently reader doesn't read anyone else words.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
" The Americans hit hardest will be those already struggling to make ends meet.

This is simply incorrect. Cap and trade creates revenue, which can be used to mitigate the costs for consumers."


And that is why the following is part of the bill?; Section (2) At the request of the State Agency, eligible low-income households within the State shall receive a monthy cash energy refund to the estimated loss in purchasing power resulting from this act.

Looks to me this clown is just another liberal parrot.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Obama and his minions have been misrepresnting this bill since it started. They know it will be devestating to the economy or they wouldn't of been putting in welfare provisions and job-loss provisions into it.

Transparancy and accountability a pig's fat ..... Change we can all believe in...... :mad:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Mike said:
Why are Dems so afraid of Sarah? :roll:



CNN) — A majority of Americans think Sarah Palin is stepping down as Alaska's governor for political reasons, according to a new national poll, with a majority of Republicans now saying that they do not believe that Palin would be an effective president.

Only 33 percent of Republicans questioned in a CBS News survey released Monday night say that Palin would have the ability to serve effectively as president. Last fall, 71 percent of registered Republicans felt that way.




Scared of what....a quitter....a low ranking quitter at that????? :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Mike said:
Why are Dems so afraid of Sarah? :roll:



CNN) — A majority of Americans think Sarah Palin is stepping down as Alaska's governor for political reasons, according to a new national poll, with a majority of Republicans now saying that they do not believe that Palin would be an effective president.

Only 33 percent of Republicans questioned in a CBS News survey released Monday night say that Palin would have the ability to serve effectively as president. Last fall, 71 percent of registered Republicans felt that way.




Scared of what....a quitter....a low ranking quitter at that????? :lol: :lol: :lol:

You're as afraid of Sarah as you are a rattlesnake and you know it. :roll:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Mike said:
kolanuraven said:
Mike said:
Why are Dems so afraid of Sarah? :roll:



CNN) — A majority of Americans think Sarah Palin is stepping down as Alaska's governor for political reasons, according to a new national poll, with a majority of Republicans now saying that they do not believe that Palin would be an effective president.

Only 33 percent of Republicans questioned in a CBS News survey released Monday night say that Palin would have the ability to serve effectively as president. Last fall, 71 percent of registered Republicans felt that way.




Scared of what....a quitter....a low ranking quitter at that????? :lol: :lol: :lol:

You're as afraid of Sarah as you are a rattlesnake and you know it. :roll:


Nope, I shoot rattlers. :wink:
 

Mike

Well-known member
CNN) – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's political action committee is confirming a flood of new donations that push her cash haul close to the million-dollar mark, as one of the nation's largest liberal PACs announced an ad targeting the former GOP vice presidential candidate. Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton confirmed a report in the Anchorage Daily News that more than $200,000 had poured into SarahPAC since Palin's announcement a week and a half ago that she would be leaving office by the end of the month.

You'll need to shoot Sarah then. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Sarah Palin does not have diddly to do with Cap and Trade. It is not her bill and she has offered no legislation.

She made a comment and some one with an agenda use her to headline his agenda.

You folks that think you have a tooth ache had best check your mouths closely. What you are actually feeling is the hook. You bought into this hook line and sinker as if it was new news.

Kolo, Sarah does not have a dog in this race! Let it go. Nothing she says about this issue is going to change anything one iota.
 

VanC

Well-known member
Sarah Palin, Liberal Nerds and an Envious Spinster
Douglas MacKinnon
Tuesday, July 07, 2009

With Sarah Palin’s understandable announcement that she is resigning as Governor of Alaska, predictable and outright cruel invective oozed out of the mouths of the loathing left. Why do so many liberals have such an unhinged hatred of this woman? Why do so many alleged feminists and female members of the mainstream media openly and gleefully despise Palin?

As I have said elsewhere, for the last ten months, like the regularity of the Sun rising or setting, Maureen Dowd of The New York Times relentlessly hurled insults at Palin, this past Sunday being no exception. Why? If -- as Dowd and other attackers on the left maintain -- Palin is inconsequential, ignorant, untalented and part of the unwashed masses, why not just let her recede into history? Why the constant attacks?

As to why Vanity Fair and other liberal outlets go after her, the answer is quite simple: money. With uncounted thousands from the left who equally hate Palin, Vanity Fair and the other media outlets understand -- especially in a bad economy with declining circulation -- that there is gold to be mined from the fragile minds of those who hate. For them, this is the story that keeps giving. And as long as the uncounted haters from the left continue to froth at the mouth at the very mention of Palin, Vanity Fair, Keith Olbermann and others will feed the beast for ratings and revenue.

Fine. I get that. But why Dowd and the feminists? With regard to The New York Times columnist, I asked a female friend of mine who happens to be a psychologist, what might prompt the anger? She mentioned a host of possibilities, but settled on one theory. That being that Dowd "may be threatened or envious of Palin...or both. As an aging but still attractive woman, Dowd may resent Palin's good looks. Further, as a single woman of a certain age, she may be envious that Palin has a husband, a family and has carved out an accomplished political career."

While not a fan of psycho-babble, it does seem to be a plausible explanation.

With regard to why Todd Purdum of Vanity Fair, David Letterman, and other liberal males continually go after Palin, the answer might be as easy as they secretly lust after her while also seeing her as the "girlfriend of the quarterback" they could never get in high school. Seriously, look at the "men" who belittle Palin on a regular basis. For the most part, they fit the description of "the pencil-neck geek" from high school. Are they now trying to make Palin pay for their long-ago inadequacies? Is that why Letterman imagines her now as a "Slutty Flight Attendant?" Because she is his fantasy and rather than admit it, he strikes out at her?

As Governor Palin leaves the elected stage…for now…she appears to be doing so for entirely logical reasons. For almost a year, democrats -- local and national -- have gone after her with a vengeance with their favorite mode of attack being to file false ethics charges against her. To date (as Alaska law mandates) she has had to spend over $500,000 of her own money defending herself against these trumped-up charges. How easy it is for others not in her shoes to say “…the Governor has decided to abandon the State and her constituents before her term has concluded," when that Governor could be facing even more false ethics charges that could financially cripple her family.

How easy for those not in the arena to attack her decision to step down when they suffer zero consequences either way. Palin (along with her children and grandchild) has been vilified and smeared like no elected official in modern political history simply because she was a conservative woman on a national ticket whose traditional values petrified the liberal media and intelligentsia. The repugnant Vanity Fair article proving that the mainstream media offensive against her is still in full bore with no sign of abatement.

Other than liberal male nerds and envious spinsters, who says Sarah Palin is not allowed to take a break, catch her breath, protect her family from remorseless and revolting attacks, and make the money needed to not only pay off her legal bills, but get far enough ahead so as to have the financial freedom to choose her next path to walk? National or otherwise.

As she starts on that next path, one can only hope that she does not go far. If ever there was a time our nation needed someone with her gifts and beliefs, it is now.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
backhoeboogie said:
Kolo, Sarah does not have a dog in this race! Let it go. Nothing she says about this issue is going to change anything one iota.

Ohh..you're wrong Boogie!! She keeps putting her dog in the race each and every time she opens her mouth.


If she quit cause of being beat up by the media.....one would think she'd stay out the media eye wouldn't ya?

But no.....she right smack dab in the middle.
 

Tam

Well-known member
hey guys-- ignore this type of lunacy. If Palin said she flossed her teeth regularly, some people (and I think we all know who she is) would find something to criticize in it. Or make something up. And if you prove they made it up, they babble and point to the sky to distract like a toddler caught messing in their daddy's vegetable garden.

One agenda only, to discredit anyone that opposes Obama regardless of the truth or the repercussions. And libel and slander and rumor and lies are as good a way as any.



:wink: :wink:
 

don

Well-known member
about the only thing you'll find the left and right agreeing on is that they both hope palin is the repub candidate for pres in 2012.
 
Top