• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sarah....PAY YOUR TAXES

jingo2

Well-known member
Sarah is as bad as Timmy G.....


Seems the gal hasn't paid her taxes either on some prop.


No pay....no play in political system I say.


I had to pay mine.....you paid yours ( I hope)....does she get another set of rules to play by????
 

Liveoak

Well-known member
burnt said:
My advice to her would be "Illegitimi non carborundum" . . .

"Don't let the bastards grind you down". ?????

Hmmm. Well, if she doesn't pay up, the media will certainly grind her up! Either that, or she'll have to explain to the American public how they can get out of paying their own taxes.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
There are no tax assessments for the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna spotted Thursday in an aerial survey. Property taxes totaling $156.13 were paid on the land in 2009 � but that bill did not include anything for the structures because the local assessor didn't know about the new construction nearly 100 miles north of Anchorage.

Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said it is not the responsibility of property owners to report structures that go up on their land.

"It is the borough's job," he said in an e-mail. "The property taxes on this parcel are fully paid and have never been delinquent."

:lol:
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Why didn't the libs have this uproar when Timmy actually DIDN'T pay his taxes. The leftwing media and it's leftist followers go down in flames again
 

jingo2

Well-known member
So if you don't get caught.....it's OK???


So since you are saying that the resp of tax knowledge goes to the borough?

which says that Sarah does not know that she OWES taxes?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Comparing not paying taxes on an assessment that has not been completed to not paying taxes when the IRS says you owe taxes is two totally different things.

and you know dang well it is. Her taxes were paid on the property in 2009, sounds like an assessment will be done for 2010 and she'll no doubt pay those taxes too.

This is another case of the left trying to dig up dirt, that has proven to be a bunch of crap.
 

jingo2

Well-known member
The bldgs have been in the prop for 5 years.


By her being Gov during that time also....sounds like she can't keep up with gathering in her taxes for her state as a whole.

One would think a GOV. would now they have to pay taxes.....
 

per

Well-known member
Digging up dirt with a dull spade on the frozen tundra. That is how it works here as well. They assess every few years and you pay based on the assessment. Just like she will. It's like comparing a catastrophic plane crash to a normal landing. They both happen on the ground.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
down_in_flames.jpg
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
jingo2 said:
So if you don't get caught.....it's OK???


So since you are saying that the resp of tax knowledge goes to the borough?

which says that Sarah does not know that she OWES taxes?

Sarah hasn't broken any laws (as opposed to Rangel, Geithner, Daschle, etc....). She won't "get caught". The next time an assessment is made on the property, her tax base will be raised in the exact same manner that it happens when other people have built on their property. That's the way that it works and has worked. This is a complete "non-story" and yet another example of the left's fear of Palin. If you want a real tax story, I suggest you look at good 'ol Charlie Rangel.
 

TSR

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
There are no tax assessments for the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna spotted Thursday in an aerial survey. Property taxes totaling $156.13 were paid on the land in 2009 � but that bill did not include anything for the structures because the local assessor didn't know about the new construction nearly 100 miles north of Anchorage.

Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said it is not the responsibility of property owners to report structures that go up on their land.

"It is the borough's job," he said in an e-mail. "The property taxes on this parcel are fully paid and have never been delinquent."


:lol:

I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
TSR said:
hypocritexposer said:
There are no tax assessments for the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna spotted Thursday in an aerial survey. Property taxes totaling $156.13 were paid on the land in 2009 � but that bill did not include anything for the structures because the local assessor didn't know about the new construction nearly 100 miles north of Anchorage.

Palin's attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said it is not the responsibility of property owners to report structures that go up on their land.

"It is the borough's job," he said in an e-mail. "The property taxes on this parcel are fully paid and have never been delinquent."


:lol:

I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.

You need a building permit in South Dakota now too. Only needed one the last fifteen years or so though. Hard to believe that Alaska is even further behind the times then South dakota.
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
TSR said:
hypocritexposer said:

I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.

You need a building permit in South Dakota now too. Only needed one the last fifteen years or so though. Hard to believe that Alaska is even further behind the times then South dakota.

How exactly is losing more Liberties "behind the times"?

Do you not enjoy Freedom?
Why does Freedom scare you?
 

Bullhauler

Well-known member
Lonecowboy said:
Bullhauler said:
TSR said:
I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.

You need a building permit in South Dakota now too. Only needed one the last fifteen years or so though. Hard to believe that Alaska is even further behind the times then South dakota.

How exactly is losing more Liberties "behind the times"?

Do you not enjoy Freedom?
Why does Freedom scare you?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Bullhauler said:
TSR said:
hypocritexposer said:

I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.

You need a building permit in South Dakota now too. Only needed one the last fifteen years or so though. Hard to believe that Alaska is even further behind the times then South dakota.

From the Wasilla Home Page

Q: Do I need a building permit?
A: The City of Wasilla does not require building permits. However, building permits are required by the Alaska State Fire Marshall for anyone who plans to construct, repair, remodel, add fire systems or change occupancy for any building other than residential housing that is three-plex or smaller or anyone who plans to install or change fuel tanks.
.

Now The city of Wasilla doesn't require a permit and Wouldn't the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna not fall under the Other Than catagory for the Fire Marshall permit? :?

No story here just more liberal mud slinging. :wink:
 

Liveoak

Well-known member
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35238034/ns/politics

* "The governor coached her staff on how to disguise the amount of electrical work needed at the mansion to hook up her new tanning bed."

----------------------------------------------

Now, why would she do a thing like that? :D
 

Larrry

Well-known member
This thing is disgusting....I mean that the left is grasping at straws. You left wing go try some of your morality in your odumbo in chief....when you get done..let us know
 

jingo2

Well-known member
Tam said:
Bullhauler said:
TSR said:
I just wonder if this means Alaska doesn't require building permits? I guess you could put up a factory in Alaska and not have to worry about the taxes? Here in TN if you add a deck on your house you are required to get a building permit. All this is so they can keep your property taxes current. Building permits are published in our local paper here. Could be different from state to state but I kinda doubt it. States need some way to keep up with new construction or they will lose a lot of tax money.

You need a building permit in South Dakota now too. Only needed one the last fifteen years or so though. Hard to believe that Alaska is even further behind the times then South dakota.

From the Wasilla Home Page

Q: Do I need a building permit?
A: The City of Wasilla does not require building permits. However, building permits are required by the Alaska State Fire Marshall for anyone who plans to construct, repair, remodel, add fire systems or change occupancy for any building other than residential housing that is three-plex or smaller or anyone who plans to install or change fuel tanks.
.

Now The city of Wasilla doesn't require a permit and Wouldn't the two-story, house-sized cabins, a workshop and a sauna not fall under the Other Than catagory for the Fire Marshall permit? :?
No story here just more liberal mud slinging. :wink:

Maybe because the props ARE NOT in Wasilla.
 
Top