• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Satellite feed cut/Wikileaks/CNN

Faster horses

Well-known member
http://www.teaparty.org/video-satellite-feed-cut-soon-congressman-mentions-wikileaks-cnn-193266/

(Infowars) – During an appearance on CNN this morning, Congressman Chris Collins’ satellite feed was cut as soon as he began talking about Wikileaks.
 

Tam

Well-known member
One has to wonder why so many people think the leaked emails should not he talked about when Hillary's campaign has not admitted the information leaked was false. They only comment on the idea that Russia stole them so nobody should believe them. As Hillary would say "What difference does it make at this point" if it was Russia the question is are the emails true and if they are then why hasn't the media picked up and investigated the leaked information IF THEY ARE NOT IN THE BAG FOR HILLARY? And if Russia was able to hack Podesta's emails how is she and those 17 agencies so sure she was not hacked before she destroyed her email server and numerous Blackberry's?
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Every communication involving an elected individual that involves the office that is not classified for security, should be available for immediate review by all citizens.

All classified information should be reviewable by congress. Any leaked classified information should involve a trial and a rope.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Which leads me to this question: if these emails involve the secretary of state office and personel of the secretary of state, or advisors of the secretary of state, and the information is not classified, what information would be present that should/would not be accessible by FOIA?


Russia or not Russia, what is revealed that should not already be public access?
 

Tam

Well-known member
The reason Clinton used a private server to do SOS business is because she did not want any of her emails to be subject to FOIA and when she thought they would come out anyway she DESTROYED them. So anything these leaked emails brings out while she was being investigated for corruption the voters should have every right to know due to the fact she DESTROYED her emails that should have been on PUBLIC RECORD. How else is anyone going to know what she was and is up to. Anyone believing she will not destroy evidence of wrong doing as President needs to have their head examined.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
The only ones left in her camp not only expect it, but applaud the obstruction and destruction.

The number of ignorant have dwindled this time. The truth about our situation is reaching more and more... it's the reason so many are so distraught. They don't like Donald for his personality, but realize Hillary is as dishonest as the day is long. Trust will trump personality.


I don't have a clue what his policies will actually be on trade. But if he holds true to the second amendment and supports constitutional justices that will empower the states as it was ment to be shrinking the federal, i will very supportive of his election.
It far outweighs Hillary.

If he is able to cut the head off of the Clinton Cartel while exposing Jeb, Little Rubio, and Ryan, he will have served our country well.

His acknowledgement about giving the states the power and that late term abortion is horrid went a long way with me. I find him more acceptable than just "not killary".
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Faster horses said:
She wants gun control so "toddlers won't get shot" but she thinks abortion in the 9th month is okay. :roll:

Right?

I'm glad that the election isn't being waged on abortion. People can't think past the excusses that the liberals provide for being selfish and wanting government to be involved with the poor choices they make in whom they let into their bedrooms.


Her body... but it's not her body that is being ripped apart. Completely different DNA sequence, nothing about it is her body.

The fools want to require general anesthesia to castrate a calf but don't think twice about ripping a poor little fetus apart limb by limb.

This is all you have to know about Hillary, liberals and planned parenthood.

Because of the obvious fact that late-term abortions cause pain for preborn children, a California assemblyman introduced the Fetal Pain Prevention Act of 1998, which would have required that babies be sedated to reduce their suffering in third trimester abortions.

(The Center for Disease Control indicates thirty-nine hundred of these are performed annually in California alone.)

Planned Parenthood strongly opposed the bill, which subsequently failed.


I pity the ignorant that buy the lies and suffer the mental torment once they realize the reality of the their actions.

Severe depression experienced by many in our culture has several causes, and this is one.
 

Tam

Well-known member
How did you like when Trump commented about late term abortions and babies being ripped apart and Hillary's answer to it was the health of the mother should be the deciding factor on whether or not she has an abortion and that the government should stay out of it as women agonize over their decision to have one? I'm sorry but if you are in your third trimester and choose a late term abortion over the life of your viable baby there is a problem with your thinking and I doubt you were agonizing over your decision or you would have picked to let your viable baby be taken alive not dismembered and sucked out. The argument might also be made that it is stressful and expensive to raise a handicapped child and doing so might harm the mother's health and wellbeing so should a woman have the right to an after birth abortion because she doesn't want a child with a birth defect? When is it OK to step in and protect the life of the baby from a mother that doesn't want it ? The Dems are the first to shout we have to protect those that can't protect themselves but they have no problem killing babies that can't protect themselves.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Tam said:
How did you like when Trump commented about late term abortions and babies being ripped apart and Hillary's answer to it was the health of the mother should be the deciding factor on whether or not she has an abortion and that the government should stay out of it as women agonize over their decision to have one? I'm sorry but if you are in your third trimester and choose a late term abortion over the life of your viable baby there is a problem with your thinking and I doubt you were agonizing over your decision or you would have picked to let your viable baby be taken alive not dismembered and sucked out. The argument might also be made that it is stressful and expensive to raise a handicapped child and doing so might harm the mother's health and wellbeing so should a woman have the right to an after birth abortion because she doesn't want a child with a birth defect? When is it OK to step in and protect the life of the baby from a mother that doesn't want it ? The Dems are the first to shout we have to protect those that can't protect themselves but they have no problem killing babies that can't protect themselves.
I'm by no means an expert on this, but how many birth defects now aren't detected early on in the pregnancy? All of this late term abortion stuff seems sick, and not rooted in reality.
 

Latest posts

Top