• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

science based on facts..

Steve

Well-known member
at first I thought this was just another racist speaking out against Obama,.. but he was very convincing...



Republicans Are More Pro-Science Than Democrats

Neil deGrasse Tyson defends government support for U.S. science research under President George W. Bush, and says that, contrary to popular belief, “funding for science under Republican administrations has been historically higher than under Democrats.”

http://www.conservativevideos.com/2012/08/are-republicans-more-pro-science-than-democrats/

Neil deGrasse Tyson (play /ˈniːəl dəˈɡræs ˈtaɪsən/ born October 5, 1958) is an American astrophysicist and science communicator. He is currently the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space and a research associate in the department of astrophysics at the American Museum of Natural History. Since 2006 he has hosted the educational science television show NOVA scienceNOW on PBS

but he is a smart and thoughtful racist.. with an impressive academic record.. and is very liberal..

and I disagree with him on many "issues"... if not almost all issues..

but his facts are hard to refute... :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Science changes, though, doesn't it?


time_iceage1.jpg
 

Steve

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Good video. I enjoyed his delivery and factual information.


I'm going to check out some of his other stuff.

I did, and he is a far.. far left liberal and by his writing I would say he is atheist.. I doubt we really agree on anything..

but at least he is rational and tries to be honest.. something you just don't often see in public.. a rational honest liberal

so I thought I would point it out that at least one still exists.. they are not extinct yet..
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Steve said:
hypocritexposer said:
Good video. I enjoyed his delivery and factual information.


I'm going to check out some of his other stuff.

I did, and he is a far.. far left liberal and by his writing I would say he is atheist.. I doubt we really agree on anything..

but at least he is rational and tries to be honest.. something you just don't often see in public.. a rational honest liberal

so I thought I would point it out that at least one still exists.. they are not extinct yet..


I would peg him as being a "moderate", not something you see too often from the "Left" nowadays. Most are "radical", where they do not agree with the majority.

That's what "radical" or "extreme" means, doesn't it?


I thought that was the definition, but the "Left" might have changed it again. They have a habit of doing that.
 
Top