• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

SCOTUS opens door to another challange to O's eligibility

Whitewing

Well-known member
I see just one downside to all of this.
















Joe_Biden.jpg
 

Steve

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
I see just one downside to all of this.

Joe_Biden.jpg

yep but his brain aneurism will act up and Hillery's will suddenly heal..

actually if Obama is ineligible.. then was Biden ever elected?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Chap. III. -- An act to establish an uniform Rule Of Naturalization.(a)

Section I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
of America in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, who shall
have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of
two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law
court of record, in any one of the states wherein he shall have resided for the term of one
year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good
character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law, to support the constitution of
the United States, which oath or affirmation such court shall administer; and the clerk of such
court shall record such application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person
shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. And the children of such persons so
naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the
time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the
children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of
the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of
citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United
States:
Provided Also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, shall be admitted a
citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of the state in which such person was
proscribed.(a)
Approved, March 26, 1790.
 

Steve

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Chap. III. -- An act to establish an uniform Rule Of Naturalization.(a)

Section I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
of America in Congress assembled, That any alien, being a free white person, who shall
have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of
two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law
court of record, in any one of the states wherein he shall have resided for the term of one
year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good
character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law, to support the constitution of
the United States, which oath or affirmation such court shall administer; and the clerk of such
court shall record such application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person
shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. And the children of such persons so
naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the
time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the
children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of
the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of
citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United
States:
Provided Also, That no person heretofore proscribed by any state, shall be admitted a
citizen as aforesaid, except by an act of the legislature of the state in which such person was
proscribed.(a)
Approved, March 26, 1790.

yep,.. but since Obama was born in Canada he can be your King to... :?
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
Doesn't the fact that it reaches the level of the Supreme Court give the case some credibility?

How is this not covered in the news?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
TSR said:
Because Shepard (sp?) said on Faux news the birther issue was rediculous.

Yep-- and for the past 4- 5 years the rightwingernuts have e-mailed or posted false "Court Case" articles that were all soon proven to be false-BUT the rightwingernuts kept circulating them- which makes their credibility about 10 points below NIL.... :wink: :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
TSR said:
Because Shepard (sp?) said on Faux news the birther issue was rediculous.

Yep-- and for the past 4- 5 years the rightwingernuts have e-mailed or posted false "Court Case" articles that were all soon proven to be false-BUT the rightwingernuts kept circulating them- which makes their credibility about 10 points below NIL.... :wink: :lol:


Which "false court cases" are you speaking of?


Post them and raise your credibility to 20 points below Nil.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
TSR said:
Because Shepard (sp?) said on Faux news the birther issue was rediculous.

Yep-- and for the past 4- 5 years the rightwingernuts have e-mailed or posted false "Court Case" articles that were all soon proven to be false-BUT the rightwingernuts kept circulating them- which makes their credibility about 10 points below NIL.... :wink: :lol:


Which "false court cases" are you speaking of?


Post them and raise your credibility to 20 points below Nil.


Just to make it easier- rather than post out all those that were thrown out and went nowhere--- why don't you post all those that actually still exist and are in the system...

And I still have not found a mainstream newsite that will back this article- altho have found some like the factchecker sites that claim this article is again rightwingernut bullshite -- and one says old Orly went so broke she had to go back to her real occupation of sticking her fingers in peoples mouths .... :wink:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
Yep-- and for the past 4- 5 years the rightwingernuts have e-mailed or posted false "Court Case" articles that were all soon proven to be false-BUT the rightwingernuts kept circulating them- which makes their credibility about 10 points below NIL.... :wink: :lol:


Which "false court cases" are you speaking of?


Post them and raise your credibility to 20 points below Nil.


Just to make it easier- rather than post out all those that were thrown out and went nowhere--- why don't you post all those that actually still exist and are in the system...

And I still have not found a mainstream newsite that will back this article- altho have found some like the factchecker sites that claim this article is again rightwingernut bullshite -- and one says old Orly went so broke she had to go back to her real occupation of sticking her fingers in peoples mouths .... :wink:

So "false court cases" are defined by "those that get thrown out"?
 

TSR

Well-known member
Maybe you should address your concerns to O'Reilly or Hannity. It would be interesting to see if they would go against Shepard.
 

Steve

Well-known member
what is strange is how the qualifications change when the shoe is on the other foot ....

Ted Cruz Already Experiencing Presidential Buzz, but is He Eligible?

Questions raised about Cruz's eligibility for president

An article in Politico raises the question of whether Cruz is even eligible to be president under the Constitution. The matter revolves around what a "natural born citizen" means. Does it mean someone born in the United States or someone born of at least one American citizen parent? Cruz was born in Canada to an American-citizen mother. Constitutional experts Politico consulted for the piece seem to agree that Cruz has a good case that he is indeed a "natural born citizen" under the Constitution, though it is expected that the question will arise again if and when he decides to run for president.

if the issue is so settled.. why did it make it to numerous credible news feeds?
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
Which "false court cases" are you speaking of?


Post them and raise your credibility to 20 points below Nil.


Just to make it easier- rather than post out all those that were thrown out and went nowhere--- why don't you post all those that actually still exist and are in the system...

And I still have not found a mainstream newsite that will back this article- altho have found some like the factchecker sites that claim this article is again rightwingernut bullshite -- and one says old Orly went so broke she had to go back to her real occupation of sticking her fingers in peoples mouths .... :wink:

So "false court cases" are defined by "those that get thrown out"?

That is what I was thinking. Maybe should all chip in and buy him a dictionary. Or maybe post a word of the day for him.

wait, here is a free link he can use: http://www.merriam-webster.com/
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
I may be dead before this prediction is ever proven, but I'll make it anyway.

One day it will be revealed that our esteemed Prez gamed the US college university system to get financial aid and college admission that rightly should have gone to another student.

How'd he do it?

It'll be revealed that he claimed Kenyan citizenship when applying for student loans and admission.

Of course, as compared to bankrupting the country and turning it into a western-European-style welfare state, those facts will only be footnotes.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
I may be dead before this prediction is ever proven, but I'll make it anyway.

One day it will be revealed that our esteemed Prez gamed the US college university system to get financial aid and college admission that rightly should have gone to another student.

How'd he do it?

It'll be revealed that he claimed Kenyan citizenship when applying for student loans and admission.

Of course, as compared to bankrupting the country and turning it into a western-European-style welfare state, those facts will only be footnotes.
Would you also care to predict if the news media will pick up on the story, or not?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Traveler said:
Whitewing said:
I may be dead before this prediction is ever proven, but I'll make it anyway.

One day it will be revealed that our esteemed Prez gamed the US college university system to get financial aid and college admission that rightly should have gone to another student.

How'd he do it?

It'll be revealed that he claimed Kenyan citizenship when applying for student loans and admission.

Of course, as compared to bankrupting the country and turning it into a western-European-style welfare state, those facts will only be footnotes.
Would you also care to predict if the news media will pick up on the story, or not?

I imagine you'll be able to find the story on page 34 of the NYTimes.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Traveler said:
Whitewing said:
I may be dead before this prediction is ever proven, but I'll make it anyway.

One day it will be revealed that our esteemed Prez gamed the US college university system to get financial aid and college admission that rightly should have gone to another student.

How'd he do it?

It'll be revealed that he claimed Kenyan citizenship when applying for student loans and admission.

Of course, as compared to bankrupting the country and turning it into a western-European-style welfare state, those facts will only be footnotes.
Would you also care to predict if the news media will pick up on the story, or not?

I imagine you'll be able to find the story on page 34 of the NYTimes.

Have you seen a NYT's lately? There's only 33 pages on a good day. :lol:

They're about to fold.
 
Top