P Joe
Well-known member
I post an answer to all 3 that replied back
1st up LB
I agree that having the game warden trample across the pasture is not ideal. Back east he pulled in the approach when he talked to us. And like I said if he had drove across the field in the middle of our hunt I would have been furious too. I do beleive they should have more game checks and such. I think that would be better then driving across pastures for compliance checks. I know you have had some real hard headed GF&P officers out there and I have 1st hand knowledge of that. But I strongly feel that if they change that law for out west that it should be change for us in the east as well.
On the game warden issue, I am spoiled by ours. I do get to have coffee with the guy every saturday and sunday morning. He is one of the guys, don't get me wrong he will write tickets out when need be. But he lives and is part of our community. His kids play ball at high school. He does take the time to talk with us. And I understand that your gripe is truly with the GF&P and not with us.
I do understand that the wildlife does take resources away from you. But I suffer the same thing under worse conditions. It is illegal to shoot deer in the road ditch, but it is legal to shoot a pheasant. I raise 750 pheasant chicks annually and turn loose on MY land. Even though they are my pheasants, if they happen to cross the fence, it is legal for the public to shoot them. I don't have a problem with it. I think everyone has the right to be able to shoot a pheasant in their lifetime. And I can gurantee that I have more money tied up in those pheasants then you do any of your deer or antelope. I don't do guided hunts, I make no money from letting people hunt. I do this for my family and friends that come.
But one of the proposals, and maybe not by your group, does deal direclty with hunters and deer season. This new proposal has to do with sponsorship for hunters where a landowner would sponsor a hunter and he would be eligable for a special set of tags.
I don't beleive this to be right. I think it would be ok if you had a brother or uncle or something that wanted to come back and shoot a deer on you land. I think family should be able to buy a tag and shoot a deer on a family members land. But what I see happening is the landowner sponsoring the people with $$$. Meaning that I must pay the landowner $$$ for his sponsor ship. This will only open up the door to bigger outfitters. The tradtional deer hunt will end. Have you watched KELO news lately espically before the opening of pheasant season. It made me sick when all they could talk about is how much money out-of-state hunters bring in. Absolutley sick to my stomach. Too often this state forgets about the local residents that live here 365 and pay taxes and make this whole thing possible. With that proposal, I see deer hunting heading down the same road as the big pheasant outfitters. You won't be able to shoot one unless you have $$$$.
LB, I know your gripe is with the GF&P but you are hurting the hunters as well. My landowner did lock out his land. I use to go out and help him all the time, even for 2 years after we couldn't hunt, but for the last 4 I haven't. And I miss that. I have come to the conculsion that why should I make the trip twice a year on $3 gas to help him out and get nothing back in return. I know what started this whole fight between the landowners and GF&P, and I just wish that everyone could sit aside some differerences and come up with an answer that would make everyone happy so this would end. Like you said, GF&P officals are not elected. I understand that you are trying to change people's mind with this lockout. But by keeping me off the property and changing my mind, how does this accomplish the goal. I can't do anything more than you can. I can't vote my GF&P officer out either.
JingleBob
Most of what I said above can pertain to you too.
I don't think you can compare corn to grass. Grass does grow back, well most years
I know that this year was bad. You could see where the cows walked and that grass was gone. But normal years it is not. Now if you drive across corn, that corn is not going to grow back. I am sorry but their is no comparison.
One thing, I do call the landowners before I apply and after I get my tag. I have riden around with the racher so I know where his land ends. Most of the time he hunts with us. If more ranchers did this, their might be less trespassing. Some hunters don't do what I do, and I do not have an sympathy for them when they get in trouble or turned down from hunting. And if I happen to see deer on a neighbors land, I do drive in and ask permission then, I don't beleive that would justify me as a slob. It never hurts to ask. I am much happier with people who ask me to hunt then the ones who try to sneak out there and quick get back off.
Fulton
I beleive you missed my whole point. No where did I ever say that I have a right to hunt on private land because I got a tag. I think I did say that I have been out there to fix fence, and help brand, and sort cattle for sale day. I think that if you truly belive that these animals are yours, then you should keep them on your property as you do with your cattle, then you have any and all right to do with them as you please.
You can shoot pheasants for free on public roads and right aways. I beleive that this right should remain forever. I do let people, complete stangers, who have stopped and said " I seen 3 big roosters on you corner, do you mind if I get them?" shoot those 3 big roosters. I have even taken my dog out with them to help. I get just as much joy out of that as I would if I had shot them my self.
All: I am not trying to start a fight with any one here, I just want to get a better understanding of what it is you guys want done. I think the lockout was a good thing to try to get some of your concerns answered, but I beleive that it has expired and will not help you out much more. If you want more done, I feel that you will need the help of the east river people as well. I don't see the state having different sets of rules for each side, and if you guys want things to change, you will have to reach out and make us east river guys understand your point of view.
1st up LB
I agree that having the game warden trample across the pasture is not ideal. Back east he pulled in the approach when he talked to us. And like I said if he had drove across the field in the middle of our hunt I would have been furious too. I do beleive they should have more game checks and such. I think that would be better then driving across pastures for compliance checks. I know you have had some real hard headed GF&P officers out there and I have 1st hand knowledge of that. But I strongly feel that if they change that law for out west that it should be change for us in the east as well.
On the game warden issue, I am spoiled by ours. I do get to have coffee with the guy every saturday and sunday morning. He is one of the guys, don't get me wrong he will write tickets out when need be. But he lives and is part of our community. His kids play ball at high school. He does take the time to talk with us. And I understand that your gripe is truly with the GF&P and not with us.
I do understand that the wildlife does take resources away from you. But I suffer the same thing under worse conditions. It is illegal to shoot deer in the road ditch, but it is legal to shoot a pheasant. I raise 750 pheasant chicks annually and turn loose on MY land. Even though they are my pheasants, if they happen to cross the fence, it is legal for the public to shoot them. I don't have a problem with it. I think everyone has the right to be able to shoot a pheasant in their lifetime. And I can gurantee that I have more money tied up in those pheasants then you do any of your deer or antelope. I don't do guided hunts, I make no money from letting people hunt. I do this for my family and friends that come.
But one of the proposals, and maybe not by your group, does deal direclty with hunters and deer season. This new proposal has to do with sponsorship for hunters where a landowner would sponsor a hunter and he would be eligable for a special set of tags.
I don't beleive this to be right. I think it would be ok if you had a brother or uncle or something that wanted to come back and shoot a deer on you land. I think family should be able to buy a tag and shoot a deer on a family members land. But what I see happening is the landowner sponsoring the people with $$$. Meaning that I must pay the landowner $$$ for his sponsor ship. This will only open up the door to bigger outfitters. The tradtional deer hunt will end. Have you watched KELO news lately espically before the opening of pheasant season. It made me sick when all they could talk about is how much money out-of-state hunters bring in. Absolutley sick to my stomach. Too often this state forgets about the local residents that live here 365 and pay taxes and make this whole thing possible. With that proposal, I see deer hunting heading down the same road as the big pheasant outfitters. You won't be able to shoot one unless you have $$$$.
LB, I know your gripe is with the GF&P but you are hurting the hunters as well. My landowner did lock out his land. I use to go out and help him all the time, even for 2 years after we couldn't hunt, but for the last 4 I haven't. And I miss that. I have come to the conculsion that why should I make the trip twice a year on $3 gas to help him out and get nothing back in return. I know what started this whole fight between the landowners and GF&P, and I just wish that everyone could sit aside some differerences and come up with an answer that would make everyone happy so this would end. Like you said, GF&P officals are not elected. I understand that you are trying to change people's mind with this lockout. But by keeping me off the property and changing my mind, how does this accomplish the goal. I can't do anything more than you can. I can't vote my GF&P officer out either.
JingleBob
Most of what I said above can pertain to you too.
I don't think you can compare corn to grass. Grass does grow back, well most years

One thing, I do call the landowners before I apply and after I get my tag. I have riden around with the racher so I know where his land ends. Most of the time he hunts with us. If more ranchers did this, their might be less trespassing. Some hunters don't do what I do, and I do not have an sympathy for them when they get in trouble or turned down from hunting. And if I happen to see deer on a neighbors land, I do drive in and ask permission then, I don't beleive that would justify me as a slob. It never hurts to ask. I am much happier with people who ask me to hunt then the ones who try to sneak out there and quick get back off.
Fulton
I beleive you missed my whole point. No where did I ever say that I have a right to hunt on private land because I got a tag. I think I did say that I have been out there to fix fence, and help brand, and sort cattle for sale day. I think that if you truly belive that these animals are yours, then you should keep them on your property as you do with your cattle, then you have any and all right to do with them as you please.
You can shoot pheasants for free on public roads and right aways. I beleive that this right should remain forever. I do let people, complete stangers, who have stopped and said " I seen 3 big roosters on you corner, do you mind if I get them?" shoot those 3 big roosters. I have even taken my dog out with them to help. I get just as much joy out of that as I would if I had shot them my self.
All: I am not trying to start a fight with any one here, I just want to get a better understanding of what it is you guys want done. I think the lockout was a good thing to try to get some of your concerns answered, but I beleive that it has expired and will not help you out much more. If you want more done, I feel that you will need the help of the east river people as well. I don't see the state having different sets of rules for each side, and if you guys want things to change, you will have to reach out and make us east river guys understand your point of view.