• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sex Slavery As Old As Sharia Law

Mike

Well-known member
Let's see the fatman defend Islam and sex slavery now. LMFAO!!!!



Islamic State terrorists explained in a new publication their justification for taking women and using them as sex slaves, saying simply that it’s a practice that’s as old as Sharia law — and allowed by Islamic beliefs.

“One should remember that enslaving the families of the kuffar — the infidels — and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah, or Islamic law,” the group said in an online magazine cited by CNN.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/oct/13/islamic-state-taking-women-as-sex-slaves-firmly-es/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS#ixzz3G2X3wP3u
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
CNN) -- In a new publication, ISIS justifies its kidnapping of women as sex slaves citing Islamic theology, an interpretation that is rejected by the Muslim world at large as a perversion of Islam.

Just like slavery is mentioned often in the Bible- and apparently was misinterpreted for hundreds of years by Christians that were slaveholders (who used the Bible for years to justify their actions) ...
We now interpret those Bible passages to be wrong or have a differing meaning and not to be followed verbatim- just as most Muslims do not follow the Islamic theology that purports women to be slaves....

Maybe the slaveholders of old Alabamy and old Mississippi were idea for the ISIS of today !!
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
CNN) -- In a new publication, ISIS justifies its kidnapping of women as sex slaves citing Islamic theology, an interpretation that is rejected by the Muslim world at large as a perversion of Islam.

Just like slavery is mentioned often in the Bible- and apparently was misinterpreted for hundreds of years by Christians that were slaveholders (who used the Bible for years to justify their actions) ...
We now interpret those Bible passages to be wrong or have a differing meaning and not to be followed verbatim- just as most Muslims do not follow the Islamic theology that purports women to be slaves....

Maybe the slaveholders of old Alabamy and old Mississippi were idea for the ISIS of today !!

You're just too phucking stupid to see that the Bible had rules about the treatment of Indentured Servants (Christian & Jewish Slaves).

Watch the Video again. :roll: Try & learn a little.
We had slaves down here, but we didn't massacre thousands of Indian women & children just to take their land. At least we let the ones that wanted to assimilate stay.
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
CNN) -- In a new publication, ISIS justifies its kidnapping of women as sex slaves citing Islamic theology, an interpretation that is rejected by the Muslim world at large as a perversion of Islam.

Just like slavery is mentioned often in the Bible- and apparently was misinterpreted for hundreds of years by Christians that were slaveholders (who used the Bible for years to justify their actions) ...
We now interpret those Bible passages to be wrong or have a differing meaning and not to be followed verbatim- just as most Muslims do not follow the Islamic theology that purports women to be slaves....

Maybe the slaveholders of old Alabamy and old Mississippi were idea for the ISIS of today !!

Your precious Quran has a word in it that you should look up it's definition. The word is abrogation. You can always check out www.answeringmuslims.com when you're not rescuing at risk kids, too.

One other question for the Great Defender of the Muslim Faith....just how many Muslims have actually read your precious Quran? Or are the just going along with what their Imam says? How many of your Muslim brethren in their part of the world can actually read?
 

Mike

Well-known member
Getting back on topic for Fatsquatch:
Islamic State terrorists explained in a new publication their justification for taking women and using them as sex slaves, saying simply that it’s a practice that’s as old as Sharia law — and allowed by Islamic beliefs.

“One should remember that enslaving the families of the kuffar — the infidels — and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah, or Islamic law,” the group said in an online magazine cited by CNN.

Is Slavery still allowed in Christian beliefs? :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Getting back on topic for Fatsquatch:
Islamic State terrorists explained in a new publication their justification for taking women and using them as sex slaves, saying simply that it’s a practice that’s as old as Sharia law — and allowed by Islamic beliefs.

“One should remember that enslaving the families of the kuffar — the infidels — and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah, or Islamic law,” the group said in an online magazine cited by CNN.

Is Slavery still allowed in Christian beliefs? :roll:

It would not surprise me - in some parts of the Christian world...

As this article points out- it was still being actively promoted in the U.S. in 1992....

Why Christians Should Support Slavery

Key reasons advanced by southern church leaders


THE EDITORS | posted 1/01/1992 12:00AM


1 of 1



Many southern Christians felt that slavery, in one Baptist minister’s words, “stands as an institution of God.” Here’s why.

Biblical Reasons

• Abraham, the “father of faith,” and all the patriarchs held slaves without God’s disapproval (Gen. 21:9–10).

• Canaan, Ham’s son, was made a slave to his brothers (Gen. 9:24–27).

• The Ten Commandments mention slavery twice, showing God’s implicit acceptance of it (Ex. 20:10, 17).

• Slavery was widespread throughout the Roman world, and yet Jesus never spoke against it.

• The apostle Paul specifically commanded slaves to obey their masters (Eph. 6:5–8).

• Paul returned a runaway slave, Philemon, to his master (Philem. 12).

Charitable and Evangelistic Reasons

• Slavery removes people from a culture that “worshipped the devil, practiced witchcraft, and sorcery” and other evils.

• Slavery brings heathens to a Christian land where they can hear the gospel. Christian masters provide religious instruction for their slaves.

• Under slavery, people are treated with kindness, as many northern visitors can attest.

• It is in slaveholders’ own interest to treat their slaves well.

• Slaves are treated more benevolently than are workers in oppressive northern factories.

Social Reasons

• Just as women are called to play a subordinate role (Eph. 5:22; 1 Tim. 2:11–15), so slaves are stationed by God in their place.

• Slavery is God’s means of protecting and providing for an inferior race (suffering the “curse of Ham” in Gen. 9:25 or even the punishment of Cain in Gen. 4:12).

• Abolition would lead to slave uprisings, bloodshed, and anarchy. Consider the mob’s “rule of terror” during the French Revolution.

Political Reasons

• Christians are to obey civil authorities, and those authorities permit and protect slavery.

• The church should concentrate on spiritual matters, not political ones.

• Those who support abolition are, in James H. Thornwell’s words, “atheists, socialists, communists [and] red republicans.”

Copyright © 1992 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine.
Click here for reprint information on Christian History.
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/1992/issue33/3324.html


And some of the countries listed as the worst in human trafficking are supposed Christian nations:

The State Department rates most of the countries in the world on a three tier format. They rated 14 countries at Tier 3. These are countries whose governments do not fully comply with the minimum standards of the U.S. federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) and are not making significant efforts to do so: Bolivia, Burma, Cambodia, Cuba, Ecuador, Jamaica, Kuwait, North Korea, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Togo, United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_world.htm
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Getting back on topic for Fatsquatch:
Islamic State terrorists explained in a new publication their justification for taking women and using them as sex slaves, saying simply that it’s a practice that’s as old as Sharia law — and allowed by Islamic beliefs.

“One should remember that enslaving the families of the kuffar — the infidels — and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah, or Islamic law,” the group said in an online magazine cited by CNN.

Is Slavery still allowed in Christian beliefs? :roll:

It would not surprise me - in some parts of the Christian world...

As this article points out- it was still being actively promoted in the U.S. in 1992....

Why Christians Should Support Slavery

Key reasons advanced by southern church leaders


THE EDITORS | posted 1/01/1992 12:00AM


1 of 1



Many southern Christians felt that slavery, in one Baptist minister’s words, “stands as an institution of God.” Here’s why.

Biblical Reasons

• Abraham, the “father of faith,” and all the patriarchs held slaves without God’s disapproval (Gen. 21:9–10).

• Canaan, Ham’s son, was made a slave to his brothers (Gen. 9:24–27).

• The Ten Commandments mention slavery twice, showing God’s implicit acceptance of it (Ex. 20:10, 17).

• Slavery was widespread throughout the Roman world, and yet Jesus never spoke against it.

• The apostle Paul specifically commanded slaves to obey their masters (Eph. 6:5–8).

• Paul returned a runaway slave, Philemon, to his master (Philem. 12).

Charitable and Evangelistic Reasons

• Slavery removes people from a culture that “worshipped the devil, practiced witchcraft, and sorcery” and other evils.

• Slavery brings heathens to a Christian land where they can hear the gospel. Christian masters provide religious instruction for their slaves.

• Under slavery, people are treated with kindness, as many northern visitors can attest.

• It is in slaveholders’ own interest to treat their slaves well.

• Slaves are treated more benevolently than are workers in oppressive northern factories.

Social Reasons

• Just as women are called to play a subordinate role (Eph. 5:22; 1 Tim. 2:11–15), so slaves are stationed by God in their place.

• Slavery is God’s means of protecting and providing for an inferior race (suffering the “curse of Ham” in Gen. 9:25 or even the punishment of Cain in Gen. 4:12).

• Abolition would lead to slave uprisings, bloodshed, and anarchy. Consider the mob’s “rule of terror” during the French Revolution.

Political Reasons

• Christians are to obey civil authorities, and those authorities permit and protect slavery.

• The church should concentrate on spiritual matters, not political ones.

• Those who support abolition are, in James H. Thornwell’s words, “atheists, socialists, communists [and] red republicans.”

Copyright © 1992 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine.
Click here for reprint information on Christian History.
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/1992/issue33/3324.html

You really think that Article from "Christian History" was a viewpoint from 1992 and not during the slavery days in the USA? My god you are stupid!!

"Actively promoted in 1992"? IT'S A HISTORY WEBSITE!!!!!!
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
So, OT continues to use Old Testament scriptures to demonize Christians...I didn't think Christians even came into being until after Christ was born

That's besides the point isn't it? You have to learn to think like a leftist liberal. You cannot use anything logical in your thought patterns. Sensationalism is where its at. Understand now? If not, that's okay; I never understand them either.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
iwannabeacowboy said:
A serious question OT.


By what authority do you believe that one person does not have the right to own another?


Just a piddly little piece of paper called the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;


And since some folks didn't get that- the 13th Amendment:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
iwannabeacowboy said:
A serious question OT.


By what authority do you believe that one person does not have the right to own another?


Just a piddly little piece of paper called the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;


And since some folks didn't get that- the 13th Amendment:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

That only covers a tiny piece of the Earth. What about the rest of the other people in all four corners?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;

Interesting that you quote this about life, liberty and pursuit of happiness and that governments derive their powers from the consent of the governed. I suspect you know where I'm going with it.

Of course, within about 10 years of the signing of the Declaration of Independence there was held a US Constitutional Convention where it was decided by delegates from both north and south that those equal negros would count as three-fifths of a person.

:lol:

Hey OT, a serious question. Would you have favored slavery if you'd lived in the day?
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
iwannabeacowboy said:
A serious question OT.


By what authority do you believe that one person does not have the right to own another?


Just a piddly little piece of paper called the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;


And since some folks didn't get that- the 13th Amendment:

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

So you believe that slavery is only a legal matter and not a moral matter?

Slavery is only wrong if an acting government over a specified area declares it wrong?


Edit to add: Most liberals keep saying we live in a Democracy. So if a majority of the US population believes in slavery and the Constitution is amended so that slavery is legalized, then you don't have a problem with slavery?

It's only the law on the books that forms your opinion?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Iwanna's post reminded me...

OT claims slavery is as much Christian as it is Muslim, so can he list the Christian theocracies ("Christian Countries") that approve of slavery?

I'm sure we can come up with a few Islamic countries that do...

I wonder if he might be able to do the same with FGM
 

Latest posts

Top