lightninboy
Well-known member
Washington D.C. probably has more cameras doing surveillance in it that any other place in the world. Obviously I am mentioning this for a reason. How many times on television did all of us repeatedly see Flights 11 and 175 crash into the WTC? Why did we not see any footage of this "Boeing 757" hit the Pentagon? To answer that question, the U.S. Military claimed it did not have ANY footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. Were we actually meant to believe that they had no video footage of this event taking place? No surveillance cameras at the Pentagon? Well, there were in fact surveillance videos showing an aircraft hitting the Pentagon.
Why would the FBI confiscate these films and refuse to release them? The government claimed that it had no footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. However, in 2003 the Pentagon released 5 frames of video. The only problem was these 5 frames of video seemed to raise a lot more questions than they answered.
When looking at the video, you would probably realize there are only 5 frames of video, and you would wonder “Why are there only 5 frames?” A U.S. security camera takes 60 FPS. So, if there were only 5 frames of video, that means that the Boeing 757 traveled 80 Meters (length of the lawn of the Pentagon) in only 0.0833 of a second, which means the aircraft was traveling at a bit over 1000 meters a second (1KM a second.)
100 / 60 = 1.6666 (how fast is each frame taken, considering security cameras take 60 FPS)
1.6666 x 5 = 8.3333 (there are 5 frames of video)
8.3333 / 100 = 0.08333 (convert to milliseconds)
1000 / 80 = 12.5
12.5 x 0.08333 = 1.0416
1.0416 = KM a second the aircraft was traveling.
1.0416 x 60 = 62.496 (KM per minute)
62.496 x 60 = 3 749.76 (KM per hour)
3 749.76 / 1.609 = 2 330.490 (convert to MPH)
According the government, the Boeing 757 which hit the Pentagon was only traveling at 530 MPH. If U.S. security cameras record at 60 FPS, and these are the only frames which the government claims to posses, the aircraft which hit the Pentagon was traveling at over 2,000 MPH (over 3,000 KM)! Obviously we can conclude from this that the government has taken frames out of this footage. Either that or the Boeing 757 which supposedly crashed into the Pentagon managed to travel at speeds that only military aircraft can travel at. If the "Boeing 757" which hit the Pentagon was traveling at 500 MPH, we know that there should be at least 20 frames of video. Why doesn't the U.S. military/government release these frames? What are they trying to hide?
The second question you’re probably asking is “Where is the Boeing 757 in the film?” The only thing you can see is a small white aircraft that looks a lot more like a drone than a Boeing 757. The Pentagon is 77 ft tall. A Boeing 757 has a tail height of 44 ft, meaning it is more than half the height of the building. How come the object shown appears to be less than half the height of the Pentagon? Below is a picture of a super-imposed Boeing 757.
Does the small white aircraft look anything (in shape) like the super-imposed Boeing 757? Did the military cut out 15 or more frames of the video so we would be unable to identify what hit the Pentagon? If a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, the above film should have looked similar to the film below.
Obviously the fireball at the Pentagon was a bright red and rose upwards and expanded very quickly. Fires that are powered by hydrocarbons are pretty much always yellow. They are not a bright red color. The fact that the fireball at the Pentagon was a bright red points towards a lot of oxygen being inside the fireball. When hydrocarbons start burning, the air around them is quickly consumed. Explosives are a mix of fuel and oxygen. With military grade explosives, oxygen is attached to the fuel source of the explosive, allowing a fast and rapid expansion of the explosive. Below is a picture of what the Pentagon fireball should have looked like:
You should notice that with fires that are powered by hydrocarbons such as candle flames do not expand. The flame reaches a certain size and then stops, and unless more fuel is added it stays the same size. The flame also wonders aimlessly. However, the fireball at the Pentagon continued rising upwards. The Pentagon is 77 ft tall. We could estimate that the fireball at the Pentagon was over 200 ft. tall. Considering the plane hit the Pentagon head on, it is not possible that the fireball could expand like that. A fireball that expands and rises quickly upwards like that is characteristic of explosives.
Below is a picture showing how far the smoke from the explosion that took place at the Pentagon rose:
From this angle it is quite hard to see the Pentagon. However, we could estimate that this plume of smoke is at least 5 times the size of the Pentagon. Also notice that this fireball is not drifting upwards. It is actually expanding (which is characteristic of explosives).
Why would the FBI confiscate these films and refuse to release them? The government claimed that it had no footage of Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. However, in 2003 the Pentagon released 5 frames of video. The only problem was these 5 frames of video seemed to raise a lot more questions than they answered.
When looking at the video, you would probably realize there are only 5 frames of video, and you would wonder “Why are there only 5 frames?” A U.S. security camera takes 60 FPS. So, if there were only 5 frames of video, that means that the Boeing 757 traveled 80 Meters (length of the lawn of the Pentagon) in only 0.0833 of a second, which means the aircraft was traveling at a bit over 1000 meters a second (1KM a second.)
100 / 60 = 1.6666 (how fast is each frame taken, considering security cameras take 60 FPS)
1.6666 x 5 = 8.3333 (there are 5 frames of video)
8.3333 / 100 = 0.08333 (convert to milliseconds)
1000 / 80 = 12.5
12.5 x 0.08333 = 1.0416
1.0416 = KM a second the aircraft was traveling.
1.0416 x 60 = 62.496 (KM per minute)
62.496 x 60 = 3 749.76 (KM per hour)
3 749.76 / 1.609 = 2 330.490 (convert to MPH)
According the government, the Boeing 757 which hit the Pentagon was only traveling at 530 MPH. If U.S. security cameras record at 60 FPS, and these are the only frames which the government claims to posses, the aircraft which hit the Pentagon was traveling at over 2,000 MPH (over 3,000 KM)! Obviously we can conclude from this that the government has taken frames out of this footage. Either that or the Boeing 757 which supposedly crashed into the Pentagon managed to travel at speeds that only military aircraft can travel at. If the "Boeing 757" which hit the Pentagon was traveling at 500 MPH, we know that there should be at least 20 frames of video. Why doesn't the U.S. military/government release these frames? What are they trying to hide?
The second question you’re probably asking is “Where is the Boeing 757 in the film?” The only thing you can see is a small white aircraft that looks a lot more like a drone than a Boeing 757. The Pentagon is 77 ft tall. A Boeing 757 has a tail height of 44 ft, meaning it is more than half the height of the building. How come the object shown appears to be less than half the height of the Pentagon? Below is a picture of a super-imposed Boeing 757.
Does the small white aircraft look anything (in shape) like the super-imposed Boeing 757? Did the military cut out 15 or more frames of the video so we would be unable to identify what hit the Pentagon? If a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon, the above film should have looked similar to the film below.
Obviously the fireball at the Pentagon was a bright red and rose upwards and expanded very quickly. Fires that are powered by hydrocarbons are pretty much always yellow. They are not a bright red color. The fact that the fireball at the Pentagon was a bright red points towards a lot of oxygen being inside the fireball. When hydrocarbons start burning, the air around them is quickly consumed. Explosives are a mix of fuel and oxygen. With military grade explosives, oxygen is attached to the fuel source of the explosive, allowing a fast and rapid expansion of the explosive. Below is a picture of what the Pentagon fireball should have looked like:
You should notice that with fires that are powered by hydrocarbons such as candle flames do not expand. The flame reaches a certain size and then stops, and unless more fuel is added it stays the same size. The flame also wonders aimlessly. However, the fireball at the Pentagon continued rising upwards. The Pentagon is 77 ft tall. We could estimate that the fireball at the Pentagon was over 200 ft. tall. Considering the plane hit the Pentagon head on, it is not possible that the fireball could expand like that. A fireball that expands and rises quickly upwards like that is characteristic of explosives.
Below is a picture showing how far the smoke from the explosion that took place at the Pentagon rose:
From this angle it is quite hard to see the Pentagon. However, we could estimate that this plume of smoke is at least 5 times the size of the Pentagon. Also notice that this fireball is not drifting upwards. It is actually expanding (which is characteristic of explosives).