• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Sheriff Joe: Birth certificate/Selective Service forged

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Faster horses

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
29,489
Reaction score
671
Location
NE WY at the foot of the Big Horn mountains
Obama certificate a fraud...


(WND) - An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.

The investigative team has asked Arpaio, who is at a news conference in Phoenix live-streamed by WND TV that began at 3 p.m. Eastern time, to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.

Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.

In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.

The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.

Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.

“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.

The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.

The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.

The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.

Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.

The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

“A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery,” Arpaio said.

Among the evidence released at the press conference are five videos – which can be seen at the end of this article – to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.

The videos consist of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document. They display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.

The investigators contend the videos illustrate their conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan is enhanced by Optical Character Recognition, OCR, and optimized.

Additionally, the posse says, the videos demonstrate that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar’s name stamp and the registrar’s date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.

“That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself,” Zullo said, emphasizing that if the registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.

The investigators also chronicled a series of allegedly inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding any original birth records held by the Hawaii Department of Health.

“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”

Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.

The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.

“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.

“In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States.”

In addition, investigators say they have developed credible evidence that President Obama’s Selective Service card was a forgery, based on an examination of the postal date stamp on the document. Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.

Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/
 

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery, Al
Interesting that the "Left" has turned on and is ignoring Joe simply because of his run-ins and disagreements with Obama, yet he continues to get respect from the masses, except in this case.

When Bill Maher starts calling Joe a nut and fruitcake, you'll know the fix is on.

I can't wait to hear OT say Joe is wrong on this subject..................


Political Science - 262 pages



Outspoken, no-nonsense, and eminently fascinating, Joseph M. Arpaio captured the public's imagination from his first day as sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, in 1992. For 15 years, he has maintained an unprecedented 80% approval rating; famous for his "get smart and get tough" approach to jails, "Sheriff Joe," as he is universally known, is one of the country's most respected elected officials. In JOE'S LAW, he tackles some of the most important and difficult issues facing America today, while offering innovative and fair ways to solve these problems.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
18,486
Reaction score
0
Location
Nebraska
As far as I'm concerned, anybody who poo-poos this is a traitor. They are aiding and abetting a huge fraud and lie.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
This was on Canada Free Press today

Showdown: Sheriff Arpaio vs. the legend of Barry Soetoro as Barack Hussein Obama II






- Doug Hagmann Monday, March 5, 2012
(0) Comments | Print friendly | Email Us



12


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last week, the six-month investigation Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be the President of the United States by a commissioned law enforcement body concluded with a press conference by Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona. Among their investigative findings was the conclusion that there has been a systematic effort to obscure the truth about Obama, including but not limited to his birth certificate, selective service registration and citizenship status. Catching our attention as investigators was one finding in particular: records were missing from the national archives.






Specifically, records from the Immigration and Naturalization Service documenting the identities of individuals entering the U.S. on international flights from foreign countries were missing. More specifically, only the records for the period between August 1-7, 1961 were gone and presumably removed from the archives, while all other time periods remained intact.

Our investigative report published on April 8, 2011, provided readers with this very same finding, except larger in scope. We noted that “the scrubbing and altering of records pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in the 1996 election cycle. The ‘scrubbing’ or alteration of records did not begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other associates as well.”

As investigators, researchers and investigative journalists, we’ve seen this happen before. We’re also familiar with the “template of denial” used by the fact-a-phobic media in response to such findings. Simply ignore the facts.






Communist ties that… mysteriously vanish

One notable case is documented by M. Stanton Evans in his book Blacklisted by History, The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy. While conducting research for his book, he traveled to the National Archives to view a 106-page report dated August 3, 1946. The report, known as the “Klaus memo,” identified Communist Party members, Soviet agents and their facilitators working within the U.S. State Department.

He writes that the document should exist in two locations at the National Archives. The report was missing from one location, while a notice of removal from March 1993, nearly a half-century after it was written, was found in its place in the other. Other documents entrusted to the National Archives were also found to be missing, some leaving only their covers in place.

The scrubbing of records were not limited to official or government sources - they extended to the private sector as well. Newspaper archives from the McCarthy era, at that time frequently “regional” in nature, were not only missing from the newspaper morgues, they were also expunged from area library archives as well.

Regardless of one’s beliefs on the eligibility issue, the successful censoring of information vital to the history and security of the United States should convince even the most hardened skeptics that we have “enemies within.”

So, who is Barry Soetoro?

What does the scrubbing of McCarthy-era records and documents have to do with Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro? Much, it appears.

The same tactics used by Communist enemies of our nation to revise history by removing or changing it have been uncovered by our investigation and now by the official commissioned law enforcement body spearheaded by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Given the numerous findings by multiple investigative journalists, including Andrew Breirbart, of direct ties between the current occupant of the Oval Office to active communists and socialists and their ideologies, it would be perilous to our nation to continue to ignore the “legend” of Barack Hussein Obama. We must demand accountability from our current elected officials, and coverage by our “conservative” talk show hosts. We must not wait for the 2012 elections to demand the official vetting of Barry Soetoro, or is it Barack Hussein Obama?

Is it possible that we really don’t know, with absolute certainty, even the legal name of the sitting U.S. president? Sadly, yes. If you contend otherwise, you have not been paying attention to the biggest scam ever perpetrated on a slumbering populace.

The proverbial devil is in the details - or the conspicuous absence of them
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Az.
BUT BUT BUT.

A real sheriff not a wanna be from some obscure county from NOwhere MT
\
Betting the Joe's of this country don't hang around bad mouthing our friends to the north.
Or lying about hay prices!
or claiming 200 friends defending his claims..
Or lying about harassment on this forum (notice Joe is showing proof of his claims?
Or claiming to barge in on the Governor unnanounced!
Or that other people are laughing at the rest of us on Ranchers .net then failing to show proof.

Eh oldtimer (the wanna be)
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
I wonder if Joe's press conference had anything to do with this.

3/05/2012

-18 Approval index

25% strongly approve

43% Strongly disapprove

45% Total approve

54% Total disapprove

Or was it Obama's call to Pelosi's Birth Control Puppet Fluke didn't get him the reaction that he needed to out ride the attack on Religious beliefs? :?

Or maybe it was his afghan apology that seem to have very little calming affect even though he tried to claim it did. This after his supporters saying he is the man that is going to make everyone LOVE THE US? :?

Or was it his lame attempt to put the rising price of gas off on the Republicans like it was a political tactic to make he look bad? :?

Or was it Sec. Chu leaking the true Obama gas price Agenda? :?

Or was it the announcment that GMC was laying off 1300 employees after the tax payers sank billions into the Volt that they have had to temporarily stop production on as NOBODY can afford an expensive electric car that only gets 25 miles on a ten hour charge and has a chance of burning up? :?

Or was it the his Attorney General Holders stonewalling Congress on the Fast and Furious mess? :?

Or maybe it was his cutting of Vet benefits after speech after speech about how he supports the troops and their families? :?

It couldn't have been him telling Netanyahu that he has his back and all options even military force are on the table as that just happen. But does anyone really believe he is going stand with Israel after the way he has gone out of his way to hurt Israel/US relations. :roll:

The thing that surprises me is that he still has over 40% approval. What does this guy have to do to open the eyes of his supporters and get them to put down the koolaid glass? :roll:
 

Latest posts

Top