• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Someone should kick him in the ass!

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy said:
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy, I am just outraged that you are not outraged. You sure don't seem to share the same conservative cattle country ideals that most Sandhillers do. :(

Maybe it's because I got out of the Sandhills traveled some and realize there is a great big world out there besides these hills Soapweed. Maybe I've seen the pain on someone's face for the abuse they take for not being the same as everyone else yet not hurting anyone else with choices about their life they've made. Just maybe I try and look at a situation from anothers standpoint trying to not be to quick to pass judgement.

I do think that it was wrong for the man to be sending 16 year old's text messages and e-mails asking about their undergarments. I just pointed out that in Washington he's not considered a pedophile.

I try hard to not just go with the majority to form my own opinions on knowledge gained and go with what I feel. I prefer to make my own path rather then follow the trial forged by others.

Not at all do I think I know everything or am always right but if along the way I learn a thing or two and stand by what I think is fair then I think I've gained knowledge. Life is a learning experience and I'm not about to just go along with the conservitive cattle country ideal because it's easier and expected.

Somehow a line from the song THESE BOOTS ARE MADE FOR WALKING comes to mind: "Now what's right is right, but you ain't been right yet." :wink:

Cattle Army, in regard to gays, the practice just ain't right. God puts His foot down heavily and declares that it is wrong. Who am I supposed to believe, Him or you?

Believe it or not, I have friends that are gay. I like them, not because they are gay, but in spite of the fact that they are gay. We are supposed to hate sin, but love the sinner, just as God does.

Yes, there will always be gay people in this world. We can accept them and be nice to them, but we don't have to condone what they do as being right. To "condone" means to endorse, or give our stamp of approval on the practice. That is where I disagree with you. You think what they do is fine. I don't. I accept them, but don't condone what they do as being right.
Condone it?? Are any of us meer mortals in the position to decide what is to condone or have the ability to judge others??
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
X said:
CattleArmy said:
That was trying to turn the site into a cesspool?? Really ladies if that is the worst you have seen on the internet you haven't been on long.
Nobody is saying that's the worst they've seen. Just that they don't want to find that crap when they come to Ranchers. That's not so hard to figure out, is it? This is Ranchers.net, not leglickinlezzies.net. :mad:

:roll: It's in political bull it's not in the rancher section..........
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
CattleArmy said:
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy said:
Maybe it's because I got out of the Sandhills traveled some and realize there is a great big world out there besides these hills Soapweed. Maybe I've seen the pain on someone's face for the abuse they take for not being the same as everyone else yet not hurting anyone else with choices about their life they've made. Just maybe I try and look at a situation from anothers standpoint trying to not be to quick to pass judgement.

I do think that it was wrong for the man to be sending 16 year old's text messages and e-mails asking about their undergarments. I just pointed out that in Washington he's not considered a pedophile.

I try hard to not just go with the majority to form my own opinions on knowledge gained and go with what I feel. I prefer to make my own path rather then follow the trial forged by others.

Not at all do I think I know everything or am always right but if along the way I learn a thing or two and stand by what I think is fair then I think I've gained knowledge. Life is a learning experience and I'm not about to just go along with the conservitive cattle country ideal because it's easier and expected.

Somehow a line from the song THESE BOOTS ARE MADE FOR WALKING comes to mind: "Now what's right is right, but you ain't been right yet." :wink:

Cattle Army, in regard to gays, the practice just ain't right. God puts His foot down heavily and declares that it is wrong. Who am I supposed to believe, Him or you?

Believe it or not, I have friends that are gay. I like them, not because they are gay, but in spite of the fact that they are gay. We are supposed to hate sin, but love the sinner, just as God does.

Yes, there will always be gay people in this world. We can accept them and be nice to them, but we don't have to condone what they do as being right. To "condone" means to endorse, or give our stamp of approval on the practice. That is where I disagree with you. You think what they do is fine. I don't. I accept them, but don't condone what they do as being right.
Condone it?? Are any of us meer mortals in the position to decide what is to condone or have the ability to judge others??

So were you born blonde, or is it a condition that has just come about in the last few years? :???:
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy said:
Soapweed said:
Somehow a line from the song THESE BOOTS ARE MADE FOR WALKING comes to mind: "Now what's right is right, but you ain't been right yet." :wink:

Cattle Army, in regard to gays, the practice just ain't right. God puts His foot down heavily and declares that it is wrong. Who am I supposed to believe, Him or you?

Believe it or not, I have friends that are gay. I like them, not because they are gay, but in spite of the fact that they are gay. We are supposed to hate sin, but love the sinner, just as God does.

Yes, there will always be gay people in this world. We can accept them and be nice to them, but we don't have to condone what they do as being right. To "condone" means to endorse, or give our stamp of approval on the practice. That is where I disagree with you. You think what they do is fine. I don't. I accept them, but don't condone what they do as being right.
Condone it?? Are any of us meer mortals in the position to decide what is to condone or have the ability to judge others??

So were you born blonde, or is it a condition that has just come about in the last few years? :???:


I guess I just know I do not live the perfect life and can admit to that. Oh and you'll be glad to know I went to church and ligtening did not strike it of did it combust upon my foot stepping in it. :D

Were you born judgemental or is that a learned trait?
 

TSR

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
nonothing said:
Oldtimer said:
Well nonothing- I don't agree with your way of life- but thats your business as long as you don't try to shove it down mine or anyone elses throat...

But there is one thing I agree with you on:



:wink: :p :lol: :lol:

From one man to another,I agree Oldtimer...I thought lesbians enjoyed women,I enjoy women so does that make me a lesbian .....well almost...My post to Red Robin was done in tounge and cheek to him as people who read the whole posting may have gotten that....If not,I am sorry for your lack of humour and your quickness to piont fingers .......

An old cowboy sat down at the bar and ordered a drink. As he sat sipping his drink, a young woman sat down next to him. She turned to the cowboy and asked, "Are you a real cowboy?"
He replied, "Well, I've spent my whole life, breaking colts, working cows, going to rodeos, fixing fences, pulling calves, bailing hay, doctoring calves, cleaning my barn, fixing flats, working on tractors, and feeding my dogs, so I guess I am a cowboy."

She said, "I'm a lesbian. I spend my whole day thinking about women. As soon as I get up in the morning, I think about women. When I shower, I think about women. When I watch TV, I think about women. I even think about women when I eat. It seems that everything makes me think of women."

The two sat sipping in silence.

A little while later, a man sat down on the other side of the old cowboy and asked, "Are you a real cowboy?"

He replied, "I always thought I was, but I just found out I'm a lesbian."

Good one Oldtimer!!!
 

TSR

Well-known member
X said:
CattleArmy said:
I just mean I try not to judge consenting adults for choices they make.
I'm glad to see you agree that it's a choice. Some idiots say that queers are born that way.

Ann Landers for one that I recall stated that she believed some people were born homosexuals. It does make you wonder, when you see children born that doctors have a hard time determining what sex they are, if nature doesn't play other genetic tricks. A feww years ago there was a study that concluded that the brains of homosexual males were different. It seems the study came under some criticism but what study doesn't? I know of one couple that both attend church regularly, have great moral values, are really an asset to society, but yet as I understand it, one of their children is gay.
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
TSR said:
X said:
CattleArmy said:
I just mean I try not to judge consenting adults for choices they make.
I'm glad to see you agree that it's a choice. Some idiots say that queers are born that way.

Ann Landers for one that I recall stated that she believed some people were born homosexuals. It does make you wonder, when you see children born that doctors have a hard time determining what sex they are, if nature doesn't play other genetic tricks. A feww years ago there was a study that concluded that the brains of homosexual males were different. It seems the study came under some criticism but what study doesn't? I know of one couple that both attend church regularly, have great moral values, are really an asset to society, but yet as I understand it, one of their children is gay.

I researched the study in college about the differences in homosexual men and men who prefer women. There was the study that showed that an area of the brain is different in the two and also a structure of the inner ear. Both studies were criticised but as with you I acknowledge that most studies do have to endure some forms of criticism from non supporters and even sometimes those that do support the theory.
 

memanpa

Well-known member
CattleArmy said:
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy said:
It's not wrong to be gay. I think the guy realized it was inapporpriate to be sending 16 year old boys text messages and what kinda underwear are you wearing e-mails. Through the preceding two actions I think he knew the American public would be outraged.

CattleArmy, I am just outraged that you are not outraged. You sure don't seem to share the same conservative cattle country ideals that most Sandhillers do. :(

Maybe it's because I got out of the Sandhills traveled some and realize there is a great big world out there besides these hills Soapweed. Maybe I've seen the pain on someone's face for the abuse they take for not being the same as everyone else yet not hurting anyone else with choices about their life they've made. Just maybe I try and look at a situation from anothers standpoint trying to not be to quick to pass judgement.

I do think that it was wrong for the man to be sending 16 year old's text messages and e-mails asking about their undergarments. I just pointed out that in Washington he's not considered a pedophile.

I try hard to not just go with the majority to form my own opinions on knowledge gained and go with what I feel. I prefer to make my own path rather then follow the trial forged by others.

Not at all do I think I know everything or am always right but if along the way I learn a thing or two and stand by what I think is fair then I think I've gained knowledge. Life is a learning experience and I'm not about to just go along with the conservitive cattle country ideal because it's easier and expected.

BULL i was raised in the sandhills, have probaball traveled far more than you ever will. have seen more than i care to admit, and being a queer is still wrong!!!!! being a ped is worse, you can claim he is not a ped because the young man in question was 16 and that is legal age in dc!!! but what about those he hit on that were not in DC???? and in some state where 16 is not a legal age ??
bad logic but then who expected anything less from you :eek:
 

CattleArmy

Well-known member
memanpa said:
CattleArmy said:
Soapweed said:
CattleArmy, I am just outraged that you are not outraged. You sure don't seem to share the same conservative cattle country ideals that most Sandhillers do. :(

Maybe it's because I got out of the Sandhills traveled some and realize there is a great big world out there besides these hills Soapweed. Maybe I've seen the pain on someone's face for the abuse they take for not being the same as everyone else yet not hurting anyone else with choices about their life they've made. Just maybe I try and look at a situation from anothers standpoint trying to not be to quick to pass judgement.

I do think that it was wrong for the man to be sending 16 year old's text messages and e-mails asking about their undergarments. I just pointed out that in Washington he's not considered a pedophile.

I try hard to not just go with the majority to form my own opinions on knowledge gained and go with what I feel. I prefer to make my own path rather then follow the trial forged by others.

Not at all do I think I know everything or am always right but if along the way I learn a thing or two and stand by what I think is fair then I think I've gained knowledge. Life is a learning experience and I'm not about to just go along with the conservitive cattle country ideal because it's easier and expected.

BULL i was raised in the sandhills, have probaball traveled far more than you ever will. have seen more than i care to admit, and being a queer is still wrong!!!!! being a ped is worse, you can claim he is not a ped because the young man in question was 16 and that is legal age in dc!!! but what about those he hit on that were not in DC???? and in some state where 16 is not a legal age ??
bad logic but then who expected anything less from you :eek:

I am not claiming anything I just stated what the law said. I'm not even saying it's right.

Combative response wouldn't have expected anything less from you.
 

Latest posts

Top