• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

South Korean official: don't let beef get in way of FTA

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
South Korean official: don't let beef get in way of FTA
Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 4:17 PM

by Peter Shinn

The chief Korean negotiator of the U.S.-South Korean Free Trade Agreement (FTA) told a gathering of the American Chamber of Commerce in Seoul Tuesday that U.S. lawmakers would be throwing away a "golden opportunity" if they let trade irritants like the ongoing dispute over beef derail the trade deal. That news comes after South Korean officials said last week U.S. beef would eventually be treated identically to Canadian product, which is currently banned.

According to the Yonhap News Agency, South Korean Trade Minister Kim Jong-hoon said ratification of the FTA would help the U.S. establish an important trade bridgehead with South Korea ahead of Europe, Canada and China. Moreover, Minister Kim added that the failure of Congress to approve the FTA would "undermine U.S. leadership and credibility in promoting open markets and fair competition across the globe."

Regaining access to South Korea for U.S. beef wasn't part of the FTA negotiations. Nevertheless, several U.S. senators have linked support for the free trade pact with a normalization of the beef trading relationship between the U.S. and South Korea, which was initially disrupted when the U.S. found its first case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) back in December of 2003. And though South Korea nominally re-opened its market to U.S. beef in April, the relationship has been fraught with setbacks. Currently, South Korea isn't conducting quarantine inspections of U.S. beef, essentially preventing U.S. product from coming to market there.

While technical negotiations between the U.S. and South Korean officials have been ongoing, they've borne little fruit to this point. Similar discussions between Canadian and Korean officials last week, according to Yonhap, yielded only an agreement to keep talking. Both U.S. and Canadian officials had hoped a designation by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) back in May that both countries were at "minimal risk" of BSE would help reopen South Korea's market. So far, the OIE designation appears only to have garnered a promise that U.S. and Canadian beef will get the same treatment from South Korean officials.

And Minister Kim on Tuesday argued that the beef trade issue wasn't a trade issue at all. At the same time, he also vowed his government was working as hard as it could to resolve the beef trade dispute.

"However, given that this is more of a public health issue than a mere trade issue, we really have no choice but to err on the side of caution in approaching the problem," said Kim.

That's an approach that's not likely to pacify U.S. lawmakers who want a quick resolution to the beef issue. The U.S. argues its wide range of responses to BSE, as evidenced by the OIE minimal risk designation, proves the beef dispute is, indeed a trade matter, and not a public health issue at all.
 

Tex

Well-known member
This is the problem:

"However, given that this is more of a public health issue than a mere trade issue, we really have no choice but to err on the side of caution in approaching the problem," said Kim.

That's an approach that's not likely to pacify U.S. lawmakers who want a quick resolution to the beef issue. The U.S. argues its wide range of responses to BSE, as evidenced by the OIE minimal risk designation, proves the beef dispute is, indeed a trade matter, and not a public health issue at all.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
The Koreans are right. It's refreshing to see that somebody still has a little common sense and hasn't sold out to the holy grail of "trade".
 

HAY MAKER

Well-known member
I wonder when the AMI strong armed the OIE into giving canada an equal status as the United States,who they thought would believe them ?
its obvious packers wanted canada to be classified the same as the United States,they got their way.............but guess what,nobody's buying it,and as long as we are comingling beef/cattle with canada,the export market will be just a dream..............good luck
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
HAY MAKER said:
I wonder when the AMI strong armed the OIE into giving canada an equal status as the United States,who they thought would believe them ?
its obvious packers wanted canada to be classified the same as the United States,they got their way.............but guess what,nobody's buying it,and as long as we are comingling beef/cattle with canada,the export market will be just a dream..............good luck

There wasn't any strong arming. It was simply a matter of the USDA not going for the classification that we qualified for so that they could use the arguement "we are in the same class as Canada" in their efforts to "normalize" trade. This begs for a Paul Harvey "Rest of the Story" segment.

This, to me, tips their hand as to their priorities, as if we didn't already know. Instead of getting the highest classification they could for the benefit of their citizens, they decided Tyson and Cargill's "North American" herd was their priority. To them, Canadian cattle and beef imports are more important than US beef exports. US producers got sold out yet again. :mad:
 

Latest posts

Top