• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Spying

Tam

Well-known member
Nunes is going to White House to brief Trump on the findings that Intel Community used a FISA warrant to scoop up data after the election and then they unmasked the names of Trump and some of his Transition associates that reportedly were not related to Russia Investigation. If this was done legally with FISA and is nothing more that same actions as Flynn was scooped, why would Nunes feel a need to go to White House and brief Trump on it after briefing Paul Ryan . If not linked to Russia investigation why were names UNMASKED?????
 

Tam

Well-known member
Nunes is on again saying that what he read had nothing to do with Russia and he is upset as Trump should also be. He said the stuff he read was done under FISA but he did not see where it reached the level of being covered under the Foreign collection.

He also said the NSA is working with him but the FBI has not complied with his letter that is over 2 weeks old. Why is Comey stonewalling the Intel committee?
 

Tam

Well-known member
Funny Nunes must be sick of Schiff and Dems as he read the intel he received, briefed Ryan, held presser then went to White House to Brief Trump and had another presser outside the White House without telling Schiff about the new info. I would not want to be in the room when Schiff lets loose on Nunes about not filling him in and having to find out about the info by seeing it on TV.

I'm sure Schiff would have stood there glaring at Nunes and then made a statement denying everything Nunes just said about the Obama Administration surveilling Trump and his transition team.

Obama had to know it was going on as Nunes at the White House said the intel reports containing the unmasked names of Trump and his associates were delivered to other intel agencies and THE WHITE HOUSE. But this still does not answer the question to who was surveilling Trump associates that Hillary tweeted about before the election as Nunes said this info was scooped in Nov, Dec and Jan during the transition period but Hillary was tweeting in OCT. Robby Mook was on FOX talking about Clinton Campaign team being shown transcripts of Trump associates in contact with Russians. So those transcript would have had to been scooped BEFORE THE ELECTION. Nunes did say he had a couple dozen transcripts and expected more, if some of them are from Aug Sept and Oct and the names are unmasked and the White House had them does anyone believe they would not have fed that info to Hillary to help her campaign? We all know the Obama's hit the campaign trail to push Hillary over the line to protect the Dems progressive agenda.
 

Tam

Well-known member
Well Schiff had his presser and tried to explain away something he HAS NOT SEEN OR READ. He has no idea what Nunes has but is already out telling the press it's nothing. There is no THERE THERE. According to Schiff this is not the way a good investigation is run nothing like the Good investigation into Benghazi. Wasn't that the one where the Dems stonewalled Gowdy at every turn and Gowdy was out talking to the media about Hillary's illegal email server? You can see it all on You Tube within minutes of it happening. Funny this is not the way to handle a good investigation but Schiff has been at daily pressers claiming they haven't found any evidence YET in their Russian investigation. So why is it different that Nunes is out saying they have evidence on the surveillance part of that same investigation.

Nunes, the only one that has seen the info, told John Roberts this could prove Trump was right and that he was being surveilled. Trump was asked if the briefing from Nunes vindicates him and he said he thought so and he was glad they found it out.

John Roberts just said on the FIVE that he thinks people can connect the dots as Trump said more would be coming out in a week last week. and now Nunes is out saying this week a whistle blower is privately giving him this info. SO was Trump behind the info. Could Trump had gone to the NSA like they said he should, found out about this and told someone to get it to Nunes to be released? Interesting
 

Traveler

Well-known member
From the "it was a video caused the attack" useful idiot.

blob-jpg.png
 

Steve

Well-known member
Them having a data base is creepy and very Orwellian.. It may seem acceptable for them to online stalk an entire nation but it is still wrong.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
Steve said:
Them having a data base is creepy and very Orwellian.. It may seem acceptable for them to online stalk an entire nation but it is still wrong.

I have cr-tv and Mark Levin is all over this. He counted 5 felonies in what Nunes found and said he did exactly right going to the President with the information. It was the Obama Administration and questions need to be answered.
 

Tam

Well-known member
I tweeted Nunes, Gowdy and Chaffatz a link to Watters story and asked why they are not looking into this

I think Nunes went to press and Trump before going to Committee to get it out before Schiff and Dems could silence him behind the CLOAK of ongoing investigation. I also think Nunes went to Trump to see what he knew and if he was ever briefed on the NON RUSSIA SURVEILLANCE of his Transition team being reported on and spread throughout the Obama Intel Community.

It would make sense since he delayed the open hearing of Clapper, Brennen and Yate and recalled Comey and Rogers. I think he wants to re-question Comey and Rogers on who decided not to brief Trump on the NON RUSSIA SURVEILLANCE of his team. Comey can not say it was part of the ongoing Russia Investigation as Nunes has already publicly said there was no mention in what he read about Russia. So was Comey and Rogers in on the decision not to brief Trump or was that left up to DNI Clapper. IS Nunes clearing the way to lay the hold surveillance and spreading of reports mess on Clapper and Brennen. We know they have lied to Congressional hearing before so the more info Nunes and Gowdy have to go after them the more likely we are going to see something happen to clarify the depth of the mess. Obama had to know it was going on whether or not he ordered it HE KNEW, the only question is who is going to take the fall to protect Obama and the historical record of the Democrat party?

Yep Obama left office without a scandal on his watch.
 

Latest posts

Top