hypocritexposer
Well-known member
They just throw it together as they go. Their organized confusion is very transparent. When they let you know how many jobs were actually created/saved at election time, will you be suspicious?
Monday, May 11, 2009
"The Most Transparent Administration"
I happen to go to recovery.gov today and saw a chart of the jobs planned to be created or "saved" - they plan to create or "save" 106,000 jobs in Georgia. Not 105,000 and not 107,000 - precisely 106,000. How could their planning possibly be so precise? After staring at the data for a few minutes, I realized the terrible truth.
California - 396,000
Texas - 269,000
New York - 215,000
Florida - 206,000
Illinois - 148,000
Pennsylvania - 143,000
Ohio - 133,000
Michigan - 109,000
Georgia - 106,000
North Carolina - 105,000
Do you see the pattern?
Pull 3,500,000 jobs created or "saved" out of your ass. Then apportion this number to the 50 states (plus DC) according to their proportional share of the total US population and round to the nearest 1000.
I plotted the Obama jobs numbers against the population of each state (as of 7/1/2008) with the following result:
![]()
The R-squared = 0.9984 means that 99.84% of the "jobs created or saved" assigned to each state can be explained by that state's population. The remaining 0.16% is probably explained by rounding.
http://oneconservativevoice.blogspot.com/2009/05/most-transparent-administration.html