I agree, shouldn't be any question about the right to keep and bear arms. I may be naive but I really can't see any police force that would enforce the collecting of arms from their own families/friends in America. If it ever came to that there would be a lot of bloodshed for sure.Steve said:The scary part is that the right to have and keep guns is even questioned..
passin thru said:The sad things is when they put all these restrictions on gunownership...permits etc, is that it gors from a right to a privelidge. It is a RIGHT
Does an ex-felon who has commited a crime with a gun still have that "Right"?
Or did he lose his "Privilege"?
TSR said:I agree, shouldn't be any question about the right to keep and bear arms. I may be naive but I really can't see any police force that would enforce the collecting of arms from their own families/friends in America. If it ever came to that there would be a lot of bloodshed for sure.Steve said:The scary part is that the right to have and keep guns is even questioned..
Steve said:MikeDoes an ex-felon who has commited a crime with a gun still have that "Right"?
Or did he lose his "Privilege"?
"To be eligible to register to vote and participate in elections, you must be at least 18 years of age, a citizen of the United States of America, and not presently denied the right to vote as a result of a felony conviction"
rights are difficult.. if it is a right, it unfortunately should never be denied.. NO matter what..
do I want felons to have the right to vote.. no
do I want felons to own guns .. again NO..
Heck if I had my way all felons would be deported to Iraq...
but our Constitution should not be subject to change on a whim..
the reason our Governor/state is leading the fight against GW's Orwellian plans of "Real ID" and "Mandatory cattle ID-NAIS" along with many other of GW's Constitution eroding plans
Mike said:the reason our Governor/state is leading the fight against GW's Orwellian plans of "Real ID" and "Mandatory cattle ID-NAIS" along with many other of GW's Constitution eroding plans
I have read the "Unconstitutional" arguments against NAIS and they are kindergardenly ridiculous.
One example. How can anyone oppose the constitutionality of NAIS and not the "mandatory" use of any other alternative method of ID'ing cattle for movement tracking? Branding comes to mind.............
What about the tracking of automobile serial numbers by goverment agencies?
Is that unconstitutional too? :lol: :lol: