• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

t r u t h o u t

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Mike said:
Kinda desparate ain't ya, Snub? :lol:

Merriam-Webster:

create- to make or bring into existence something new

invent - to produce something new


To defend Algore is defenseless................... :lol:

I think sherbert uses the Authorized Bill Clinton Dictionary when looking up meanings of words. :wink:
 

schnurrbart

Well-known member
Mike said:
Kinda desparate ain't ya, Snub? :lol:

Merriam-Webster:

create- to make or bring into existence something new

invent - to produce something new


To defend Algore is defenseless................... :lol:

Webster's New World:

create- to cause; produce; bring about

invent- to think up; devise in the mind
As the two people who actually did do most of the coding for the present day internet said, no one could possibly think that Al Gore actually invented--to have actually did the work on the codes and infrastruture as an inventor would do-but that he actually "created the atmosphere of promoting high-speed communication when no one else in a position to do so was doing it". Only you Gore haters attack him for saying what he did without giving him the credit that he deserves for making it possible for the internet to be what it is today through his support. No one person actually "invented" the internet.
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
r u t h o u t | 02.01

Gore Nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/020107A.shtml
Former vice president Al Gore has been nominated for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his wide-reaching efforts to draw the world's attention to the dangers of global warming, a Norwegian lawmaker said Thursday. "A prerequisite for winning the Nobel Peace Prize is making a difference, and Al Gore has made a difference," Conservative member of Parliament Boerge Brende, a former minister of environment and then of trade, told the Associated Press.
 

aly

New member
IL Rancher said:
The fact that Yasser Arafat one a Nobel peace price has forever tainted that award in my mind... Yasser, Freaking, arafat.

When I was a kid my mother would refer to Yasser Arafat as a rabid dog. I have to agree with my mother, and with you. Yasser freaking Arafat? Nobel Peace Prize? Any kind of peace prize? Any kind of prize? :shock:

Jinx
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
aly said:
IL Rancher said:
The fact that Yasser Arafat one a Nobel peace price has forever tainted that award in my mind... Yasser, Freaking, arafat.

When I was a kid my mother would refer to Yasser Arafat as a rabid dog. I have to agree with my mother, and with you. Yasser freaking Arafat? Nobel Peace Prize? Any kind of peace prize? Any kind of prize? :shock:

Jinx

Why another username Alice?
 

aly

New member
aplusmnt said:
aly said:
IL Rancher said:
The fact that Yasser Arafat one a Nobel peace price has forever tainted that award in my mind... Yasser, Freaking, arafat.

When I was a kid my mother would refer to Yasser Arafat as a rabid dog. I have to agree with my mother, and with you. Yasser freaking Arafat? Nobel Peace Prize? Any kind of peace prize? Any kind of prize? :shock:

Jinx

Why another username Alice?

ok...I'm busted! Which do you like better...Jinx or Aly.

I joined this board months ago under Aly, then couldn't get the stupid thing to work. Guess it started working...now, I've got to figure out how to get rid of one or the other. Ah well, what a tangled web we weave, when we practice to deceive.

I spend way too much time on stuff like this anyway. Wish the weather would clear up.

We are outta here. Bye, Bye
 

memanpa

Well-known member
aly said:
IL Rancher said:
The fact that Yasser Arafat one a Nobel peace price has forever tainted that award in my mind... Yasser, Freaking, arafat.

When I was a kid my mother would refer to Yasser Arafat as a rabid dog. I have to agree with my mother, and with you. Yasser freaking Arafat? Nobel Peace Prize? Any kind of peace prize? Any kind of prize? :shock:

Jinx

another name ALICE??
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
memanpa said:
aly said:
IL Rancher said:
The fact that Yasser Arafat one a Nobel peace price has forever tainted that award in my mind... Yasser, Freaking, arafat.

When I was a kid my mother would refer to Yasser Arafat as a rabid dog. I have to agree with my mother, and with you. Yasser freaking Arafat? Nobel Peace Prize? Any kind of peace prize? Any kind of prize? :shock:

Jinx

another name ALICE??
Who ever she was, she's gone out like she came in. Someone shut the gate. We've got all the liberals we need in here already.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
passin thru said:
Heck I say let the libs in, after all they are so eloquent in furthering the "conservative cause"
I guess you're right. The ones that stay don't have sense enough to realize they're riding a dead horse.
 

schnurrbart

Well-known member
Red Robin said:
passin thru said:
Heck I say let the libs in, after all they are so eloquent in furthering the "conservative cause"
I guess you're right. The ones that stay don't have sense enough to realize they're riding a dead horse.

You need to quit throwing a saddle on it and we'll quit. The dead horse is in the White House and it stinks. Speaking of dead horses, saw today that now there is some confusion about how many 21500 really is. Seems some general questioned whether that was 21500 "combat" troops or 21500 "soldiers". Big difference! 21500 combat troops would require a total of about 50000 soldiers because of the support troops needed. Wish they would explain that to the American public.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
schnurrbart said:
Wish they would explain that to the American public.
Why? You think the rest of America isn't as smart as you and that's why some of us support the request to send more troops? I don't care if they send 500,000 more troops if that's what's needed.
 

schnurrbart

Well-known member
Red Robin said:
schnurrbart said:
Wish they would explain that to the American public.
Why? You think the rest of America isn't as smart as you and that's why some of us support the request to send more troops? I don't care if they send 500,000 more troops if that's what's needed.

I knew you were in favor of being misled before you stated it so eloquently. If bush said he wants to send 21500 troops, then that is what I expect but now I find out that that number may or may not be correct. I would like to know if the Congress is sure of what he is talking about. Apparently, not all of America is smart enough to know. I don't and obviously you don't either.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
schnurrbart said:
Red Robin said:
schnurrbart said:
Wish they would explain that to the American public.
Why? You think the rest of America isn't as smart as you and that's why some of us support the request to send more troops? I don't care if they send 500,000 more troops if that's what's needed.

I knew you were in favor of being misled before you stated it so eloquently. If bush said he wants to send 21500 troops, then that is what I expect but now I find out that that number may or may not be correct. I would like to know if the Congress is sure of what he is talking about. Apparently, not all of America is smart enough to know. I don't and obviously you don't either.
Unlike you shnubert, I am smart enough to know that I don't need to know. I'm not running the war.
 

memanpa

Well-known member
[Why another username Alice?[/quote]

ok...I'm busted! Which do you like better...Jinx or Aly.

I joined this board months ago under Aly, then couldn't get the stupid thing to work. Guess it started working...now, I've got to figure out how to get rid of one or the other. Ah well, what a tangled web we weave, when we practice to deceive.

I spend way too much time on stuff like this anyway. Wish the weather would clear up.

We are outta here. Bye, Bye[/quote]

months ago under the name aly?? it actually shows you as have joined in jan 2007, yes what a web you weave
 

schnurrbart

Well-known member
Red Robin said:
schnurrbart said:
Red Robin said:
Why? You think the rest of America isn't as smart as you and that's why some of us support the request to send more troops? I don't care if they send 500,000 more troops if that's what's needed.

I knew you were in favor of being misled before you stated it so eloquently. If bush said he wants to send 21500 troops, then that is what I expect but now I find out that that number may or may not be correct. I would like to know if the Congress is sure of what he is talking about. Apparently, not all of America is smart enough to know. I don't and obviously you don't either.
Unlike you shnubert, I am smart enough to know that I don't need to know. I'm not running the war.

As I said, you are quite content to be misled.
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
schnurrbart said:
Red Robin said:
passin thru said:
Heck I say let the libs in, after all they are so eloquent in furthering the "conservative cause"
I guess you're right. The ones that stay don't have sense enough to realize they're riding a dead horse.

You need to quit throwing a saddle on it and we'll quit. The dead horse is in the White House and it stinks. Speaking of dead horses, saw today that now there is some confusion about how many 21500 really is. Seems some general questioned whether that was 21500 "combat" troops or 21500 "soldiers". Big difference! 21500 combat troops would require a total of about 50000 soldiers because of the support troops needed. Wish they would explain that to the American public.

Do you want him to explain the exact locations of these troops and exactly what missions they will be going on? Are you going to be at the docks with a clicker to see exactly how many get on and off the boats?

All I need to know is he is sending more troops to try to hold areas that are lost once the fighting moves on to other areas. Good enough! The exact amount should have no stopping point. Just send them until they have enough to contain the areas in question.

Seems people like you only care about the fine specifics because you are looking for something to point a finger at Bush for. I seriously doubt your concern involves the well being of the Troops themselves. :roll:
 

memanpa

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
schnurrbart said:
Red Robin said:
I guess you're right. The ones that stay don't have sense enough to realize they're riding a dead horse.

You need to quit throwing a saddle on it and we'll quit. The dead horse is in the White House and it stinks. Speaking of dead horses, saw today that now there is some confusion about how many 21500 really is. Seems some general questioned whether that was 21500 "combat" troops or 21500 "soldiers". Big difference! 21500 combat troops would require a total of about 50000 soldiers because of the support troops needed. Wish they would explain that to the American public.

Do you want him to explain the exact locations of these troops and exactly what missions they will be going on? Are you going to be at the docks with a clicker to see exactly how many get on and off the boats?

All I need to know is he is sending more troops to try to hold areas that are lost once the fighting moves on to other areas. Good enough! The exact amount should have no stopping point. Just send them until they have enough to contain the areas in question.

Seems people like you only care about the fine specifics because you are looking for something to point a finger at Bush for. I seriously doubt your concern involves the well being of the Troops themselves. :roll:

A+ look at the post regarding toyko rose and you will understand why people like ole schnozzbert spout off so much!!!!
 

Latest posts

Top