• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Ranchers.net

Memos justifying Bush-era warrantless wiretapping released

By Laura Barron-Lopez - 09/06/14 09:12 AM EDT

Two memos released late Friday night by the Department of Justice (DOJ) offer some of the clearest insight into the Bush administration's legal reasoning for the warrantless wiretapping of U.S. citizens's phone calls, and emails to date.

The memos on the secret program, dubbed Stellar Wind by the National Security Agency, that launched after the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, were obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Washington Post reports.


While the program was exposed in 2005 by a New York Times story, and brought under court oversight in 2007, the documents released Friday give a deeper look at President George W. Bush's head of legal counsel and assistant attorney general, Jack Goldsmith's justification.

“We conclude only that when the nation has been thrust into an armed conflict by a foreign attack on the United States and the president determines in his role as commander in chief . . . that it is essential for defense against a further foreign attack to use the [wiretapping] capabilities of the [National Security Agency] within the United States, he has inherent constitutional authority” to order warrantless wiretapping — “an authority that Congress cannot curtail,” Goldsmith wrote in a redacted 108-page memo dated May 6, 2004, according to the Post.

The ACLU obtained the memos from the Justice Department through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

A staff attorney with the ACLU, Patrick Toomey, told the Post that the reasoning in the memos was "deeply disturbing" and suggested that the president's power to monitor the communications of people in the U.S. is "virtually unlimited…when it comes to foreign intelligence."

In the May memo, Goldsmith came to the conclusion that the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force by Congress, which passed shortly after the terrorist attacks, gave the "express authority for a warrantless program because it gives a thumbs up to "all necessary and appropriate force."


Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/216851-memos-justifying-bush-era-warrantless-wiretapping-released#ixzz3CXmvctrU
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Since our poster friend who deserted his country to live an apparent better life in a communist country is all hot and bothered about the Constitution this morning-- what do all you "Constitutional Scholars :roll: " think of this...

Historically during times of war we have done many similar unconstitutional acts (throwing out habeas corpus- locking up American citizens just because of their race or ethnic background- etc.) -- but do you believe its Constitutional?

I think a President/Defense Dept needs to have the power for emergency wiretap searchs on a very limited basis-- but that they, like normal search warrants and wiretap authorizations, need to have judicial oversight...
Top