• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Tex and Flounder?

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
How do you spread "wealth", by giving other peoples annual income to those that do not save, or invest?


eg. 2 ranchers, income of $100,000 per year, and $80,000 respectively, they are neighbors.


One profits $20,000 ($80,000 income) and the other takes a loss of $5000. Would it be better for the "collective", to redistribute the "wealth" of the one that profited $20,000?


If you remember, it was Conservatives on this site that said "let the banks fail", but it seems that "Progressives" like you that want to spread the wealth. And it doesn't seem to matter whether that wealth is positive or negative, you still want to bailout those that are in negative wealth territory.


Spending seems to be okay if it is "bailing" out the large corps. that did not act responsible enough to have some money in reserves.

Maybe I should spend all my money on corporate jets and such, and you will "bail" me out too, by paying my mortgage?


Heck, maybe if you increase my taxes, I could lobby government and a bigger bailout could be afforded, and I could be subsidized enough to afford to pay the employee wages/salaries, or afford that new "all in one printer" I had my eye on.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,482
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery, Al
Afraid you're barking up the wrong tree here, hypo.

They want what others have without working for it.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
Hypo said:
and I could be subsidized enough to afford to pay the employee wages/salaries, or afford that new "all in one printer" I had my eye on.

Why not, we bought two fancy $1.2 million Canadian buses, so why not buy a Canadian a fancy printer as wall..
 

Latest posts

Top